UK and Europe · Public discussion

What is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR?

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 5 posts · 254 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 October 2006
Last activity
24 October 2006
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
254
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Tom Sherman said:

    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate has expanded his domain of deliberately
    contentious posting, now that he is receiving little response to his
    trolls on alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, rec.bicycles.soc and
    rec.bicycles.misc.

    It ill becomes Tom Sherman to try to play the role of policeman on Usenet.
    After all, that is my job.

    Do members of a group have roles to play? You had better believe they do. I
    can tell within a matter of a
    few weeks what the role is of every member of a newsgroup. I have carved out
    a rather unique role for
    myself which many others have not yet adjusted to.

    But just what is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR? He used to be a main stay of
    this group, but he has for the past year or so become little more than a
    quipster. He never posts an original message, but he loves to make asinine
    remarks to the messages of others which go nowhere. In short, he has become
    irrelevant to ARBR.

    It may be that Tom is more suited to the technical cycling group where he
    can indulge his nerdiness. He is clearly not cut out for making any
    substantial posts anymore to ARBR. He has abdicated his responsibilities in
    that regard.

    On a more personal note, I am undecided whether to regard him with eternal
    hostility or not. Tom is a taker, not a giver. All of my other adversaries
    will occasionally give something, but never Tom. Jim McNamara, another
    current
    adversary of mine, is more than willing to meet me halfway once I
    cease tweaking him. But I have never detected any give in Tom no matter how
    much I give to him. It will simplify matters for me enormously if I were to
    just
    regard him as an implacable enemy.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  2. "bdbafh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    [newsgroups restored]

    Quoted message said:
    Edward Dolan said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate has expanded his domain of deliberately
    contentious posting, now that he is receiving little response to his
    trolls on alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, rec.bicycles.soc and
    rec.bicycles.misc.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It ill becomes Tom Sherman to try to play the role of policeman on Usenet.
    After all, that is my job.

    Do members of a group have roles to play? You had better believe they do.
    I
    can tell within a matter of a
    few weeks what the role is of every member of a newsgroup. I have carved
    out
    a rather unique role for
    myself which many others have not yet adjusted to.

    But just what is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR? He used to be a main stay of
    this group, but he has for the past year or so become little more than a
    quipster. He never posts an original message, but he loves to make
    asinine
    remarks to the messages of others which go nowhere. In short, he has
    become
    irrelevant to ARBR.

    It may be that Tom is more suited to the technical cycling group where he
    can indulge his nerdiness. He is clearly not cut out for making any
    substantial posts anymore to ARBR. He has abdicated his responsibilities
    in
    that regard.

    On a more personal note, I am undecided whether to regard him with
    eternal
    hostility or not. Tom is a taker, not a giver. All of my other
    adversaries
    will occasionally give something, but never Tom. Jim McNamara, another
    current
    adversary of mine, is more than willing to meet me halfway once I
    cease tweaking him. But I have never detected any give in Tom no matter
    how
    much I give to him. It will simplify matters for me enormously if I were
    to
    just
    regard him as an implacable enemy.

    What gives you the perceived right to cross post in the first place?
    For someone that holds themselves in such high esteem, surely you would
    obey the customs of Nettiquette.
    'Eternal hostility' is something that top posters and cross posters
    deserve.

    Cross posting is perfectly acceptable as long as the message is of a general
    nature so as to apply to various newsgroups. My posts are always of this
    general nature and so they will be cross posted whether you like it or not.

    However, I certainly do agree with you about the evil of top posting.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  3. Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate has expanded his domain of deliberately
    contentious posting, now that he is receiving little response to his
    trolls on alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, rec.bicycles.soc and
    rec.bicycles.misc.

    It ill becomes Tom Sherman to try to play the role of policeman on Usenet.
    After all, that is my job.

    Do members of a group have roles to play? You had better believe they do. I
    can tell within a matter of a
    few weeks what the role is of every member of a newsgroup. I have carved out
    a rather unique role for
    myself which many others have not yet adjusted to.

    But just what is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR? He used to be a main stay of
    this group, but he has for the past year or so become little more than a
    quipster. He never posts an original message, but he loves to make asinine
    remarks to the messages of others which go nowhere. In short, he has become
    irrelevant to ARBR.

    It may be that Tom is more suited to the technical cycling group where he
    can indulge his nerdiness. He is clearly not cut out for making any
    substantial posts anymore to ARBR. He has abdicated his responsibilities in
    that regard.

    On a more personal note, I am undecided whether to regard him with eternal
    hostility or not. Tom is a taker, not a giver. All of my other adversaries
    will occasionally give something, but never Tom. Jim McNamara, another
    current
    adversary of mine, is more than willing to meet me halfway once I
    cease tweaking him. But I have never detected any give in Tom no matter how
    much I give to him. It will simplify matters for me enormously if I were to
    just regard him as an implacable enemy.

    [Yawn, Zzzzzz...] 🙂

    --
    Tom Sherman - Here, not there.

  4. "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate has expanded his domain of deliberately
    contentious posting, now that he is receiving little response to his
    trolls on alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, rec.bicycles.soc and
    rec.bicycles.misc.

    It ill becomes Tom Sherman to try to play the role of policeman on
    Usenet.
    After all, that is my job.

    Do members of a group have roles to play? You had better believe they do.
    I
    can tell within a matter of a
    few weeks what the role is of every member of a newsgroup. I have carved
    out
    a rather unique role for
    myself which many others have not yet adjusted to.

    But just what is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR? He used to be a main stay of
    this group, but he has for the past year or so become little more than a
    quipster. He never posts an original message, but he loves to make
    asinine
    remarks to the messages of others which go nowhere. In short, he has
    become
    irrelevant to ARBR.

    It may be that Tom is more suited to the technical cycling group where he
    can indulge his nerdiness. He is clearly not cut out for making any
    substantial posts anymore to ARBR. He has abdicated his responsibilities
    in
    that regard.

    On a more personal note, I am undecided whether to regard him with
    eternal
    hostility or not. Tom is a taker, not a giver. All of my other
    adversaries
    will occasionally give something, but never Tom. Jim McNamara, another
    current
    adversary of mine, is more than willing to meet me halfway once I
    cease tweaking him. But I have never detected any give in Tom no matter
    how
    much I give to him. It will simplify matters for me enormously if I were
    to
    just regard him as an implacable enemy.

    [Yawn, Zzzzzz...] 🙂

    See what I mean?

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  5. TOP POST JUST FOR ED

    OVER THE YEARS, WE HAVE TROLLED THOUSANDS OF TIMES ON THE USENET.
    HERE IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINIONS TO US AT OUR HOMES.
    SEND US WHATEVER YOU'D LIKE OR CALL US 24/7?

    NOTE OUR ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS ARE PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR ALL TO
    UTILIZE.

    JAMES L. MACNAMARA
    4863 W. GREGORY ST.
    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60630
    773 282 9874

    EDWARD DOLAN
    1028 4TH AVE.
    WORTHINGTON, MN 56187
    507 727 0306

    THANK YOU,

    THE JIMMY MACNAMARA AND ED DOLAN PARTNERSHIP

    Edward Dolan said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    Mr. Ed Dolan the Grate has expanded his domain of deliberately
    contentious posting, now that he is receiving little response to his
    trolls on alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent, rec.bicycles.soc and
    rec.bicycles.misc.

    It ill becomes Tom Sherman to try to play the role of policeman on Usenet.
    After all, that is my job.

    Do members of a group have roles to play? You had better believe they do. I
    can tell within a matter of a
    few weeks what the role is of every member of a newsgroup. I have carved out
    a rather unique role for
    myself which many others have not yet adjusted to.

    But just what is Tom Sherman's role on ARBR? He used to be a main stay of
    this group, but he has for the past year or so become little more than a
    quipster. He never posts an original message, but he loves to make asinine
    remarks to the messages of others which go nowhere. In short, he has become
    irrelevant to ARBR.

    It may be that Tom is more suited to the technical cycling group where he
    can indulge his nerdiness. He is clearly not cut out for making any
    substantial posts anymore to ARBR. He has abdicated his responsibilities in
    that regard.

    On a more personal note, I am undecided whether to regard him with eternal
    hostility or not. Tom is a taker, not a giver. All of my other adversaries
    will occasionally give something, but never Tom. Jim McNamara, another
    current
    adversary of mine, is more than willing to meet me halfway once I
    cease tweaking him. But I have never detected any give in Tom no matter how
    much I give to him. It will simplify matters for me enormously if I were to
    just
    regard him as an implacable enemy.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.