peterpen said:I started out using the Training Bible (w/ a HRM) and thought it was a very good introduction to structured training. Particularly if you use WKO+, I think that's a great place to start. Pitfalls? Personally, I think one can use more (moderate) intensity in the base period than Friel advocates.
I will add that 6 months after beginning with the Training Bible, I moved to paying for quarterly testing/ training assesements/ and plans, and one year after that I began working with a coach. Not surprisingly, I think using a coach is most beneficial - and of course, it is the most expensive option. 😉
But I think there's something to be said for trying self-coaching first - just as I (heresy!) would never recommend someone brand-new to riding a bike immediately purchase a powermeter.
This is an interesting observation. Looking back over my last 28 days, I see a dip in terms of the overall time spent in the tempo training zone. Plenty of time in AR and Endurance, then a dip, then a plenty time in Threshold - I am currently in Build 2 phase.
I have built my own training program based on a combination of "Training Bible" and "Training and Racing with a PM".
Training bible gives a good foundation in terms of the following:
1. Identifying the needs of the types of events you do.
2. Identifying your own limiters in terms of your events needs.
3. Structuring the various training cycles/phases in order to peak.
4. Structuring weekly load etc to progressively overload.
Once you have an overall structure, I have used Hunter/Coggan (and Cyclingpeaks) to perform my assessments, assess my training zones, monitor progress etc.
I use a lot of Friels training sessions, but have applied Coggans zones to them. So far it seems to be working for me, will be in a better position at the end of the season to assess how effective it has been.