Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

headset facing to reduce stack height?

Started by dookie · · Last activity · 19 posts · 658 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 September 2006
Last activity
22 September 2006
Original author
dookie
Posts
19
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
658
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–19 of 19
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. long and detail-oriented, sorry. i think it's all relevant...

    my situation: i recently put a modern fork on my pre-suspension paramount
    OS mtb frame. it totally jacked the geometry, which i knew it would (85mm
    reba is >2" longer the OEM unicrown)...but i didn't realize how badly the
    handling would be affected. can you say 'laid back'? the frame has some
    substantial internal rust at the BB as well, so naturally, i rationalized
    the purchase of a new XC frame and will put the paramount out to pasture as
    a rigid SS commuter. the new frame is a kona king kahuna (ti), and has a
    slightly longer headtube (+5/16 / 8mm).

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    the headset is already low-stack (cane creek...~27mm), but luckily the
    current stem has a fairly tall clamp (50mm). if my math is correct, a 40mm
    clamp stem (there are many) should buy me a couple mm, but the steerer will
    still be well below the top of the stem.

    is it reasonable (and worth it...it's not really in my nature) to raise hell
    at performance and try to get either the stem or another crown/steerer?
    irregardless of the new frame, the work they did is shoddy at best.

    as an alternative, i understand it is possible to shorten a headtube by a
    few mm (in times of desperation) by using a facing tool to remove material
    from the top of the tube. how about from a ti frame? is this reasonable or
    a hack solution? no, performance will not be doing the work!

    thanks much!

  2. er..head*tube* facing...

    "dookie" <dookie@~obvious~dooksucks.com> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    long and detail-oriented, sorry. i think it's all relevant...

    my situation: i recently put a modern fork on my pre-suspension paramount
    OS mtb frame. it totally jacked the geometry, which i knew it would (85mm
    reba is >2" longer the OEM unicrown)...but i didn't realize how badly the
    handling would be affected. can you say 'laid back'? the frame has some
    substantial internal rust at the BB as well, so naturally, i rationalized
    the purchase of a new XC frame and will put the paramount out to pasture
    as a rigid SS commuter. the new frame is a kona king kahuna (ti), and has
    a slightly longer headtube (+5/16 / 8mm).

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand,
    not the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut
    square, and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this
    unsafe?

    the headset is already low-stack (cane creek...~27mm), but luckily the
    current stem has a fairly tall clamp (50mm). if my math is correct, a
    40mm clamp stem (there are many) should buy me a couple mm, but the
    steerer will still be well below the top of the stem.

    is it reasonable (and worth it...it's not really in my nature) to raise
    hell at performance and try to get either the stem or another
    crown/steerer? irregardless of the new frame, the work they did is shoddy
    at best.

    as an alternative, i understand it is possible to shorten a headtube by a
    few mm (in times of desperation) by using a facing tool to remove material
    from the top of the tube. how about from a ti frame? is this reasonable
    or a hack solution? no, performance will not be doing the work!

    thanks much!

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    dookie' dookie@~obvious~dooksucks.com said:

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I was just reading the installation instruction for Aheadset last night.
    I note that the steerer tube was to be cut 3mm below the top of the
    stem/spacer. I don't know why, but that's the reading the official
    installation manual for Aheadset from Cane Creek. I am sure there are
    people here who knows the technical reason for it.
    --

  4. Artoi said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    dookie' dookie@~obvious~dooksucks.com said:

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I was just reading the installation instruction for Aheadset last night.
    I note that the steerer tube was to be cut 3mm below the top of the
    stem/spacer. I don't know why, but that's the reading the official
    installation manual for Aheadset from Cane Creek. I am sure there are
    people here who knows the technical reason for it.

    3/8" is more like 9-10mm.

  5. i think you can get the clamping you need without messing with your
    frame.

    i) cane creek headsets use interlocking spacers and it's typical to
    snap at least one on the the top cup (bearing cover actually), you can
    remove this if it's there

    ii) try the stem with a smaller clamp

    iii) a few mm shorter is okay, you need it because preloading the
    bearing pushes down on the headset a mm or so.

    in fact depending on the design, facing your frame might not be a good
    idea. some headtubes like my cannondale have a thicker wall section at
    the center, so if you faced the headtube the cups may not install
    properly.

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    dookie' dookie@~obvious~dooksucks.com said:

    long and detail-oriented, sorry. i think it's all relevant...

    my situation: i recently put a modern fork on my pre-suspension paramount
    OS mtb frame. it totally jacked the geometry, which i knew it would (85mm
    reba is >2" longer the OEM unicrown)...but i didn't realize how badly the
    handling would be affected. can you say 'laid back'? the frame has some
    substantial internal rust at the BB as well, so naturally, i rationalized
    the purchase of a new XC frame and will put the paramount out to pasture as
    a rigid SS commuter. the new frame is a kona king kahuna (ti), and has a
    slightly longer headtube (+5/16 / 8mm).

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    the headset is already low-stack (cane creek...~27mm), but luckily the
    current stem has a fairly tall clamp (50mm). if my math is correct, a 40mm
    clamp stem (there are many) should buy me a couple mm, but the steerer will
    still be well below the top of the stem.

    is it reasonable (and worth it...it's not really in my nature) to raise hell
    at performance and try to get either the stem or another crown/steerer?
    irregardless of the new frame, the work they did is shoddy at best.

    as an alternative, i understand it is possible to shorten a headtube by a
    few mm (in times of desperation) by using a facing tool to remove material
    from the top of the tube. how about from a ti frame? is this reasonable or
    a hack solution? no, performance will not be doing the work!

    According to your account they owe you a new fork.

    --
    Michael Press

  7. dookie said:

    long and detail-oriented, sorry. i think it's all relevant...

    my situation: i recently put a modern fork on my pre-suspension paramount
    OS mtb frame. it totally jacked the geometry, which i knew it would (85mm
    reba is >2" longer the OEM unicrown)...but i didn't realize how badly the
    handling would be affected. can you say 'laid back'? the frame has some
    substantial internal rust at the BB as well, so naturally, i rationalized
    the purchase of a new XC frame and will put the paramount out to pasture as
    a rigid SS commuter. the new frame is a kona king kahuna (ti), and has a
    slightly longer headtube (+5/16 / 8mm).

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer. Likely the
    little morons used a hacksaw. You took the fork to a commercial shop
    for installation, not cousin Vinny's garage, twist their arm.

  8. landotter said:

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer.

    if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

  9. Quoted message said:
    landotter said:

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer.

    if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

    I think/hope he was referring to a cutting guide that goes over the
    steerer and guides the hacksaw blade in a square cut. Agree that what I
    think of as a "tubing cutter" is inappropriate, so I assume he didn't
    mean that.

    Mark J.

  10. Mark said:
    Quoted message said:
    landotter said:

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer.

    if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

    I think/hope he was referring to a cutting guide that goes over the
    steerer and guides the hacksaw blade in a square cut. Agree that what I
    think of as a "tubing cutter" is inappropriate, so I assume he didn't
    mean that.

    I did mean a regular old rotating tube cutter. Works great on steel w/o
    any deformation, don't know about aluminum. You can also use it in
    tandem with a hand saw to create a straight score to follow.

  11. landotter said:
    Mark said:
    Quoted message said:

    landotter wrote:

    >I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    >manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    >a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    >for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer.

    if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

    I think/hope he was referring to a cutting guide that goes over the
    steerer and guides the hacksaw blade in a square cut. Agree that what I
    think of as a "tubing cutter" is inappropriate, so I assume he didn't
    mean that.

    I did mean a regular old rotating tube cutter. Works great on steel w/o
    any deformation, don't know about aluminum. You can also use it in
    tandem with a hand saw to create a straight score to follow.

    Do mind the tension screw when using a pipe cutter, as it certainly is
    possible to make it a bit challenging to insert the star nut--but if
    you take it easy--no problem.

  12. landotter wrote:

    -snip-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    > deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    > (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

    I think/hope he was referring to a cutting guide that goes over the
    steerer and guides the hacksaw blade in a square cut. Agree that what I
    think of as a "tubing cutter" is inappropriate, so I assume he didn't
    mean that.

    I did mean a regular old rotating tube cutter. Works great on steel w/o
    any deformation, don't know about aluminum. You can also use it in
    tandem with a hand saw to create a straight score to follow.

    Do mind the tension screw when using a pipe cutter, as it certainly is
    possible to make it a bit challenging to insert the star nut--but if
    you take it easy--no problem.

    A tubing or pipe cutter works just fine w/ an aluminum steerer. You
    should deburr the end of any tube you cut, regardless of weather it's
    aluminum, steel, cooper, a steerer tube or not. Also if a hack saw is
    used.

    No big deal, John

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Artoi wrote:

    dookie' dookie@~obvious~dooksucks.com said:

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I was just reading the installation instruction for Aheadset last night.
    I note that the steerer tube was to be cut 3mm below the top of the
    stem/spacer. I don't know why, but that's the reading the official
    installation manual for Aheadset from Cane Creek. I am sure there are
    people here who knows the technical reason for it.

    3/8" is more like 9-10mm.

    3mm below the top of the stem allows room for the stem's cap to clear
    the steer tube (if they touch, you can't adjust the headset preload).
    3mm is just over 1/8", so it's not going to affect the stem's clamping
    ability - but 3/8" IS an awful lot of space. Too much.

    OTOH, if the stem on the bike now has a 50mm tall clamp, the easy
    solution is to just swap it out for a stem with a 40mm clamp (about
    average). The steer tube will actually have to be trimmed a bit to
    make it work. Stems are cheap - forks expensive!

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  14. landotter said:
    Mark said:
    Quoted message said:

    landotter wrote:

    >I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    >manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    >a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    >for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer.

    if you mean a pipe cutter, that's not the way to cut the steerer, it
    deforms the diameter. a hacksaw or bandsaw or some other bladed cutter
    (like a cutting wheel?) is the only correct way i have heard of.

    I think/hope he was referring to a cutting guide that goes over the
    steerer and guides the hacksaw blade in a square cut. Agree that what I
    think of as a "tubing cutter" is inappropriate, so I assume he didn't
    mean that.

    I did mean a regular old rotating tube cutter. Works great on steel w/o
    any deformation, don't know about aluminum. You can also use it in
    tandem with a hand saw to create a straight score to follow.

    it may look like a nifty way to cut a steerer, but it bulges the tube
    where it cuts, it has to. the result may or may not require further
    finishing in which case you may as well just have used a hacksaw.

  15. landotter said:


    dookie said:


    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand, not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork.

    This foolishness is what arises when manufacturers make forks whose
    crowns and steerers can't be replaced. It's a few pennies cheaper for
    them-- and hundreds of dollars more expensive for bike shops and their
    customers. I mean, would the folks who buy such forks be willing to
    throw down big bucks for a hub whose bent axle couldn't be replaced, or
    a frame with a non-replaceable cut-to-fit seatpost?

    (I'm aware that there are probably some examples of the aforementioned
    somewhere, but still, c'mon!)

    Chalo

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Chalo said:
    landotter said:


    dookie said:


    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand,
    not
    the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut
    square,
    and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this unsafe?

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork.

    This foolishness is what arises when manufacturers make forks whose
    crowns and steerers can't be replaced. It's a few pennies cheaper for
    them-- and hundreds of dollars more expensive for bike shops and their
    customers. I mean, would the folks who buy such forks be willing to
    throw down big bucks for a hub whose bent axle couldn't be replaced, or
    a frame with a non-replaceable cut-to-fit seatpost?

    I'd have more sympathy for this sentiment if getting the fork cut
    correct was hard. You measure it up, you use one of a few correct tools
    for the job, you measure it up again, and your margin of error for an
    acceptable-to-customers job is probably +- 1/8" for the actual cut line,
    a margin so great that I could probably train my dog to do it.*

    Such work as the OP describes is unacceptable, and is not on its own a
    justification for replaceable steerers (I agree with you, it would be a
    nice feature).

    Moreover, a fork should be cut once in its life, assuming it doesn't
    wander off to another frame (which happens). Even if it does, my
    inclination is always to cut conservatively (that is, leave some spacers
    where possible).

    Here's a challenge for you Chalo: given that any of the major suspension
    manufacturers make forks by the thousands (if not tens of thousands, if
    not more), and that the setup disaster noted above would be rare, how
    often could bike shops screw up before they caused more money lost (in
    wasteful replacement fork purchases) versus the money saved (for those
    SRAM fat cats, at least) by non-replaceable steerers. Please include in
    your answer the effects from reselling the "bad" forks, since in many
    cases the screw-up is usable on some shorter bicycle.

    Quoted message said:

    (I'm aware that there are probably some examples of the aforementioned
    somewhere, but still, c'mon!)

    Giant and several other makers now sell top-of-the-line frame designs
    with integrated seatposts as part of the frame. During the initial fit,
    the tube is cut to size, and the special saddle mount on top can be
    adjusted about an inch or two after the cut. This saves units, if not
    dozens of grams over conventional designs. I can't think of an example
    of a non-replaceable axle off the top of my head.

    *my dog is part Australian Cattle Dog, and thus would rate as one of
    those really smart working-dog breeds. No demented slobberhounds here.
    But still.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  17. landotter said:

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer. Likely the
    little morons used a hacksaw. You took the fork to a commercial shop
    for installation, not cousin Vinny's garage, twist their arm.

    don't blame the tool. You can make good cuts with both a hack saw and
    a tube
    cutter. If you use a hack saw, you should use a cutting guide to get a
    nice
    square cut. The LBS I frequent uses a guide + hacksaw .
    -------------------
    Alex

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Alex said:
    landotter said:

    I don't know about unsafe, but it's unprofessional, and I'd ask for the
    manager, a refund for the "work" done, and a new fork. I mean, there's
    a little thing called a "tubing cutter" which make it rather difficult
    for the even dimmest monkeys to screw up cutting a steerer. Likely the
    little morons used a hacksaw. You took the fork to a commercial shop
    for installation, not cousin Vinny's garage, twist their arm.

    don't blame the tool. You can make good cuts with both a hack saw and
    a tube
    cutter. If you use a hack saw, you should use a cutting guide to get a
    nice
    square cut. The LBS I frequent uses a guide + hacksaw .
    -------------------
    Alex

    Just to clarify, here's the tool:

    http://parktool.com/products/detail.asp?cat=50&item=SG%2D6

    I have one of these, though I don't think I've ever used it.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  19. update:

    the fork has been swapped. installing a stem with a 10mm shorter clamp
    bought me enough space that the top of the steerer is no longer below the
    upper stem clamp bolt. i feel better, though i still wish there we a few
    more mm in there.

    i spoke with a manager at performance who offered only to grind the steerer
    square and implied that perhaps *i* had created the problem (by installing
    the tall clamp stem? a taller headset?), as their mechanics are trained (to
    cut out of square?) nonsense.

    and what's all this talk about press-fit forks? is it really true that the
    steerer/crown assembly cannot be removed from the stanchions on the reba?

    btw: the king kahuna absolutely rocks!

    dookie

    Quoted message said:

    the real problem: the monkeys at the local performace shop (the brand,
    not the adjective) 'installed' the reba for me. the steerer is not cut
    square, and is nearly 3/8" below the top of the stem as-is! is this
    unsafe?

    the headset is already low-stack (cane creek...~27mm), but luckily the
    current stem has a fairly tall clamp (50mm). if my math is correct, a
    40mm clamp stem (there are many) should buy me a couple mm, but the
    steerer will still be well below the top of the stem.

    is it reasonable (and worth it...it's not really in my nature) to raise
    hell at performance and try to get either the stem or another
    crown/steerer? irregardless of the new frame, the work they did is shoddy
    at best.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.