Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Usada Aquits Floyd!!!

Started by Lonnie Utah · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,678 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
13 September 2006
Last activity
15 September 2006
Original author
Lonnie Utah
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,678
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Made you look! [img]cyclingforums.comicon10.gif[/img]

    They haven't yet anyway....

  2. "Just announced, Trees are made of wood!"

  3. linenoiz said:

    "Just announced, Trees are made of wood!"


    HAHAHAHA! Good one though!

  4. With appologies to monty python....

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! We've found a Doper! A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! We've got a Doper! A Doper! A Doper! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! We've found a Doper! We've found a Doper! A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]We have found a Doper. May we burn him? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn him! Burn! Burn him! Burn him! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]How do you know he is a Doper? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]He looks like one. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Right! Yeah! Yeah! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Bring him forward. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Floyd: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]I'm not a Doper. I'm not a Doper. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Uh, but you are dressed as one. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Floyd: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]They dressed me up like this. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Augh, we didn't! We didn't... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Floyd: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]And this isn't my nose. It's a false one. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Well? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Well, we did do the nose. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]The nose? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]And the hat, but he is a Doper! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Yeah! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]We burn him! Right! Yeaaah! Yeaah! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Did you dress him up like this? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2 and 3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No. No. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGERS #2 and #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Yes. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Yes. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Yes. Yeah, a bit. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A bit. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGERS #1 and #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A bit. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A bit. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]He has got a wart. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]RANDOM: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][cough] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]What makes you think he is a Doper? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Well, he beat me in a race! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]He beat you in a race? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]I am French. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn him anyway! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn him! Burn! Burn him!... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Quiet! Quiet! Quiet! Quiet! There are ways of telling if he is a Doper. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Are are? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Ah? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]What are they? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Tell us! Tell us!... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Tell me. What do you do with Dopers? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Burn! Burn them up! Burn!... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]And what do you burn apart from Dopers? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]More Dopers! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Shh! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Wood! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]So, why do Dopers burn? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][pause] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]B--... 'cause they're made of... wood? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Good! Heh heh. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Oh, yeah. Oh. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]So, how do we tell we tell if he is made of wood? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Build a bridge out of him. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Oh, yeah. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]RANDOM: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Oh, yeah. True. Uhh... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Does wood sink in water? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No. No. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]No, it floats! It floats! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Throw him into the pond! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]The pond! Throw him into the pond! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]What also floats in water? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Bread! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Apples! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Uh, very small rocks! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Cider! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Uh, gra-- gravy! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Chimries! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Mud! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #3: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Uh, churches! Churches! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Lead! Lead! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]ARTHUR: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A duck! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Oooh. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Exactly. So, logically... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]If... he... weighs... the same as a duck,... he's made of wood. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]And therefore? [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #2: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A Doper! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #1: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A Doper! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A Doper! A Doper!... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]VILLAGER #4: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Her is a duck. Use this duck. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][quack quack quack] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Very good. We shall use my largest scales. [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Ohh! Ohh! Burn the Doper! Burn the Doper! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! Burn him! Ahh! Ahh... [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]BEDEVERE: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Right. Remove the supports! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][whop] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][clunk] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman][creak] [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]CROWD: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]A Doper! A Doper! A Doper! [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]Floyd: [/font]

    [font=Times New Roman]It's a fair court. [/font]

  5. LOL Lonnie, do you have a lot of free time on your hands?

  6. Powerful Pete said:

    LOL Lonnie, do you have a lot of free time on your hands?


    Not really. Just google and cut and paste!

    L

  7. damnit man...

  8. Lonnie Utah said:

    Not really. Just google and cut and paste!

    L

    That's insanity! The way you test a possible doper is to throw him in a vat of EPO.
    If the EPO accepts him and he sinks to the bottom he is pure and innocent but if he rises out and sprouts wings and flys away he is doper.
    I could have is bass- ackwards but it doesn't matter.
    You can use gasoline in the place of EPO if needed.

  9. jhuskey said:

    That's insanity! The way you test a possible doper is to throw him in a vat of EPO.
    If the EPO accepts him and he sinks to the bottom he is pure and innocent but if he rises out and sprouts wings and flys away he is doper.
    I could have is bass- ackwards but it doesn't matter.
    You can use gasoline in the place of EPO if needed.

    That's only for EPO detection.

    There's a more generic doping test for all forms of dope. Since it's a [censored] thing to do, you throw them in a big vat of...

    Well, it's a thought.

  10. ...title may not be far off the mark...just read in "velonews" that f.l.'s lawyer is citing a discrepancy in control numbers on the "b" sample. could be he gets off on a technicality above and beyond the breach of protocol in releasing info before the testing of the "b". again, could be the pesky problems cited in the report which cleared armstrong's epo pee due to numerous procedural errors in the lab's chain of evidence.

    http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10866.0.html

  11. JohnO said:

    That's only for EPO detection.

    There's a more generic doping test for all forms of dope. Since it's a [censored] thing to do, you throw them in a big vat of...

    Well, it's a thought.

    They don't use that test anymore. A few years back they were testing a reluctant cyclist and two UCI officials fell in during the struggle.
    It was a tragedy as you guessed they had no record of the exact weight of each official and did not know how much [censored] to dip out.
    I don't believe they have used that test since.

  12. It would be nice, so nice, if the samples where taken, analysed, counter analysed, the results given to the UCI/WADA COMPLETELY ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE AND WITHOUT ANY ****ING LEAKS. That way when someone was caught they could be nailed straight away, without any fuss and shafted straight out of the sport.

  13. Lonnie,

    You need to re-do your cutting and pasting. What we are talking about with Floyd is the winner of the International Witches' Broomstick race being labelled a witch. Of course he's a frickin' witch. The shock would be if there were a muggle in the race.

  14. slovakguy said:

    ...title may not be far off the mark...just read in "velonews" that f.l.'s lawyer is citing a discrepancy in control numbers on the "b" sample. could be he gets off on a technicality above and beyond the breach of protocol in releasing info before the testing of the "b". again, could be the pesky problems cited in the report which cleared armstrong's epo pee due to numerous procedural errors in the lab's chain of evidence.

    http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10866.0.html

    Far more interesting than that is Pound's response to the concerns raised.

    http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10866.0.html

    Far from the foaming at the mount rants, he sounded almost neutral... a wait and see attitude without automatic accusations of guilt. A lot like what one would expect of the head of an impartial oversight organization.

    This has been a weird year for cycling.

  15. his bluster may have been a desparate action hoping that f.l. would say yet another admission/explanation, given mcquaid may have known that the numbers did not match. curiously, he does not implicate nazi frogmen switching "b" samples. wonder if they had the day off.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.