Road Cycling · Public discussion

Wind powered bike light

Started by Gooserider · · Last activity · 13 posts · 601 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 September 2006
Last activity
13 September 2006
Original author
Gooserider
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
601
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Gooserider@mouse-
    potato.com says...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php

    Very interesting idea; the installation would be easier than a dynamo, and you
    could take them from bike to bike with relative ease.

    I also like the self-lighted pedals, but don't see options for toe clips or
    clipless cleats for them (though they claim to be working on it).

    --

    __o Kristian Zoerhoff
    _'\(,_ [email hidden]
    (_)/ (_)

  3. Gooserider said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php

    Err, what about when you have a tailwind canceling out your wind? Aside
    from that, it's also increasing your drag whether you need the light or
    not. Plus at 0.25 watt it is not what I would call a worthwhile light.

    Cute in terms of blueskying, but nothing I would bother buying.

    --
    Dane Buson - [email hidden]
    "Well, that was a piece of cake, eh K-9?"
    "Piece of cake, Master? Radial slice of baked confection ... coefficient of
    relevance to Key of Time: zero." -- Dr. Who

  4. "Gooserider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php


    A Dynotec model 6 (tire generator) provides 3W.
    One of the commenters indicates that 3.5V*0.07A gives ~0.25W
    Even a tail light on a typical generator scheme is 0.6W, so this definitely
    wouldn't be much help to see by; more of a "be seen" light.

    I am slightly confused, though, and need an engineer to help.
    On the one hand, any power this generates is from increased wind drag /
    making you less aerodynamic.
    On the other hand, it sits in front of you on the handlebars, so you'd be
    blocking that wind anyway.
    I'm guessing it's the former, but anybody else want to weigh in?

    --
    Mike Kruger
    Blog: http://journals.aol.com/mikekr/ZbicyclistsZlog/

  5. Mike Kruger said:

    "Gooserider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php


    A Dynotec model 6 (tire generator) provides 3W.
    One of the commenters indicates that 3.5V*0.07A gives ~0.25W
    Even a tail light on a typical generator scheme is 0.6W, so this definitely
    wouldn't be much help to see by; more of a "be seen" light.

    I wonder how long it would take to trickle charge a battery? If
    something like this worked, I could have a battery mounted somewhere and
    not worry about putting it on the charger all the time.

    Quoted message said:

    I am slightly confused, though, and need an engineer to help.
    On the one hand, any power this generates is from increased wind drag /
    making you less aerodynamic.
    On the other hand, it sits in front of you on the handlebars, so you'd be
    blocking that wind anyway.
    I'm guessing it's the former, but anybody else want to weigh in?


  6. Quoted message said:

    "Gooserider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php

    Mike Kruger wrote:
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    I am slightly confused, though, and need an engineer to help.
    On the one hand, any power this generates is from increased wind drag /
    making you less aerodynamic.
    On the other hand, it sits in front of you on the handlebars, so you'd be
    blocking that wind anyway.
    I'm guessing it's the former, but anybody else want to weigh in?

    My off the cuff guess:
    The drag that would come from the corresponding portion of your frontal
    area tries to tip the light over (but it's mounting hardware prevents).
    The extra drag comes from moving the blades. Kind of like wearing a
    form fitting jersey vs. a snug t-shirt that still flaps in the wind.
    --
    Paul M. Hobson
    Georgia Institute of Technology
    ..:change the f to ph to reply:.

  7. Gooserider said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    It doesn't.

    Wind generation is fine if you're standing still in a spot where
    there's lots of wind. Trying to convert forward velocity through air
    back into electricity is far less efficient than simply engaging a
    mechanical connection between the wheel and a good generating device.

    The cited device is a toy, by any reasonable measure.

    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  8. chuck said:

    On 2006-09-13, Mike Kruger <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    One of the commenters indicates that 3.5V*0.07A gives ~0.25W

    Quoted message said:

    I wonder how long it would take to trickle charge a battery? If
    something like this worked, I could have a battery mounted somewhere and
    not worry about putting it on the charger all the time.

    "Trickle" is certainly the appropriate term. Let's say you're using
    this to charge a small bike light powered by 4 NiMH AA cells. The
    energy of typical NiMH cells is now about 1.2V x 2.5 A-hr = 3 W-hr and
    you have 4 of them for a total of 12 W-hr. Dividing by the power
    output of this device gives 12 W-hr / 0.25 W = 48 hours for a recharge.
    And that's assuming perfect efficiency in charging - more realistic
    would be about 60 hours per recharge.

    Depending on how much riding you do, the NiMH cells might be losing
    charge due to self-discharge about as fast as this device would be
    recharging them. A conventional dynamo seems far more practical to
    provide a useful level of electrical power.

  9. "Gooserider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm. Wonder how it compares to a hub dynamo?

    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/07/a_double_whammy.php

    Well it puts out a max of 3.5v at 70millamps so it can only power one single
    LED light.
    A typical LED uses about 20milliamps to 50 milliamps in order to light up.
    Smaller LEDs can use 20ma, wheras the brighter ones use about 40-50ma (not
    the big 1w LEDs).
    I suppose they could build the white LED light into the unit itself, making
    it self contained.
    Hummm, if the white LED light and the red LED rear light are blinking, you
    might be able to run two, if they alternate.
    at 70milliamps, you are talking the high intensity small LED's. These are
    regular LEDs that are brighter than normal.
    These are not the new high power 1 watt LEDs either.

  10. peter said:
    chuck said:

    On 2006-09-13, Mike Kruger <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    One of the commenters indicates that 3.5V*0.07A gives ~0.25W

    Quoted message said:

    I wonder how long it would take to trickle charge a battery? If
    something like this worked, I could have a battery mounted somewhere and
    not worry about putting it on the charger all the time.

    "Trickle" is certainly the appropriate term. Let's say you're using
    this to charge a small bike light powered by 4 NiMH AA cells. The
    energy of typical NiMH cells is now about 1.2V x 2.5 A-hr = 3 W-hr and
    you have 4 of them for a total of 12 W-hr. Dividing by the power
    output of this device gives 12 W-hr / 0.25 W = 48 hours for a recharge.
    And that's assuming perfect efficiency in charging - more realistic
    would be about 60 hours per recharge.

    Depending on how much riding you do, the NiMH cells might be losing
    charge due to self-discharge about as fast as this device would be
    recharging them. A conventional dynamo seems far more practical to
    provide a useful level of electrical power.


    How long would a typical dynamo take to charge a 6V battery pack? Too me
    a 6 watt bulb seems to be the minimal needed for my purposes. It'd be
    nice knowing that on a 5 hour ride the last 3 in the dark will be
    lighted.

  11. chuck said:

    How long would a typical dynamo take to charge a 6V battery pack?

    Depends on the charge capacity of the battery pack.

    Quoted message said:

    Too me
    a 6 watt bulb seems to be the minimal needed for my purposes. It'd be
    nice knowing that on a 5 hour ride the last 3 in the dark will be
    lighted.

    When riding at reasonable speeds (say over about 10 mph) you can get 6W
    directly from most dynamos just by giving them the right load. Some
    riders attach two 3W headlights in parallel and have a switch so only
    one operates at very low speeds but both can be turned on at cruising
    speed when desired. That would provide you with the 6W you want and
    would be much simpler than combining a charging circuit with a dynamo.
    The latter requires that the AC output of the dynamo be rectified to DC
    and then further regulated to avoid damage to the battery pack. That's
    not very convenient to do with the way dynamos are generally wired,
    typically using the bike frame as part of the current path.

    We used to have a cheap 12V, 6W dynamo on our tandem that provided a
    very bright light but I haven't seen those units for sale anymore.

  12. more efficient than that sloo-oow loading web page, I would hope.

    But I wouldn't put my money into it. Wind is just not as effective as a
    rolling wheel when it comes to turning something, especially anything
    with any resistance.

    - -
    Comments and opinions compliments of,
    "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    My web Site:
    http://geocities.com/czcorner

    To E-mail me:
    ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net

  13. peter said:
    chuck said:

    How long would a typical dynamo take to charge a 6V battery pack?

    Depends on the charge capacity of the battery pack.

    Quoted message said:

    Too me
    a 6 watt bulb seems to be the minimal needed for my purposes. It'd be
    nice knowing that on a 5 hour ride the last 3 in the dark will be
    lighted.

    When riding at reasonable speeds (say over about 10 mph) you can get 6W
    directly from most dynamos just by giving them the right load. Some
    riders attach two 3W headlights in parallel and have a switch so only
    one operates at very low speeds but both can be turned on at cruising
    speed when desired.

    That's correct, except the two headlights are in series, not parallel.
    It's counterintuitive, but true.

    As mentioned in another thread, typical bike generators are, roughly
    speaking, constant current devices. They try hard to put out 0.5 Amp,
    no matter what. If you give them twice as much resistance (two bulbs
    in series) they put out roughly double their normal voltage, to pump
    that 0.5 Amp through the doubled resistance.

    It's not perfect, of course. Current drops a bit. And it works only
    at high enough speeds. And only if the increased resistance torque
    doesn't make the generator slip. (Most sidewall generators will slip.)
    But it works.

    Quoted message said:

    That would provide you with the 6W you want and
    would be much simpler than combining a charging circuit with a dynamo.
    The latter requires that the AC output of the dynamo be rectified to DC
    and then further regulated to avoid damage to the battery pack. That's
    not very convenient to do with the way dynamos are generally wired,
    typically using the bike frame as part of the current path.

    Yep. As a general rule, the simpler the system, the more efficient it
    will be. This little windmill headlight is just silly. It introduces
    several extra losses.

    I think it's intended for the people who power their sailboats by
    pointing a pedal-powered fan at the sail. ;-)

    - Frank Krygowski

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.