Road Cycling · Public discussion

Another 650B candidate?

Started by Mr. Les · · Last activity · 7 posts · 548 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
6 September 2006
Last activity
8 September 2006
Original author
Mr. Les
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
548
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is a 1974 Raleigh International a candidate fro 650B conversion?
    Originally had centerpulls and is noted as having 'relaxed angles' and
    'generous tire clearance' in the old catalog.

  2. Mr. Les said:

    Is a 1974 Raleigh International a candidate fro 650B conversion?
    Originally had centerpulls and is noted as having 'relaxed angles' and
    'generous tire clearance' in the old catalog.

    If it has "generous tire clearance", why would you want to convert to
    650B?

  3. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Mr. Les said:

    Is a 1974 Raleigh International a candidate fro 650B conversion?
    Originally had centerpulls and is noted as having 'relaxed angles' and
    'generous tire clearance' in the old catalog.

    If it has "generous tire clearance", why would you want to convert to
    650B?


    The only reason I see for this type of conversion is the 74 Raleigh uses 27"
    rims and wide tires may not be available. In contrast, the allure or aura of
    650B (584mm) is its comfort. I believe there are now a number of tires that
    range from 31mm up to 41 or 42mm. Inflated at 40-60psi and supposedly the
    ride is sublimed. Have you tried it?

  4. bfd said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Mr. Les said:

    Is a 1974 Raleigh International a candidate fro 650B conversion?
    Originally had centerpulls and is noted as having 'relaxed angles' and
    'generous tire clearance' in the old catalog.

    If it has "generous tire clearance", why would you want to convert to
    650B?


    The only reason I see for this type of conversion is the 74 Raleigh uses 27"
    rims and wide tires may not be available.

    How wide do you want them to be? Good 27 x 1 1/4 tires are readily
    available (e.g., Panaracer Pasela). If that's not wide enough, make the
    sensible switch to 700C, giving slightly better tire clearance and a
    very wide choice of tires.

    Quoted message said:

    In contrast, the allure or aura of
    650B (584mm) is its comfort. I believe there are now a number of tires that
    range from 31mm up to 41 or 42mm. Inflated at 40-60psi and supposedly the
    ride is sublimed. Have you tried it?

    I don't invest time or money in dinosaurs. IMO, most of the current
    650B buzz is driven by Grant Peterson, who is peddling another "niche
    bike" to the Rivendell Faithful.

    Have you tried it? Your use of the word "supposedly" indicates the
    answer is "no".

  5. bfd said:
    Quoted message said:
    Mr. Les said:

    Is a 1974 Raleigh International a candidate fro 650B conversion?
    Originally had centerpulls and is noted as having 'relaxed angles' and
    'generous tire clearance' in the old catalog.

    If it has "generous tire clearance", why would you want to convert to
    650B?


    The only reason I see for this type of conversion is the 74 Raleigh uses 27"
    rims and wide tires may not be available. In contrast, the allure or aura of
    650B (584mm) is its comfort. I believe there are now a number of tires that
    range from 31mm up to 41 or 42mm. Inflated at 40-60psi and supposedly the
    ride is sublimed. Have you tried it?

    Another thing to think about is that the Raleigh almost certainly has
    decent clearance to begin with. If you changed it to 700c, you could
    probably run 32mm or 37mm tires without changing much of anything. Much
    large than that and you'll probably start running into issues with the
    tire rubbing against fork/chainstays, which 650B might not help much
    with.

    650B really seems like the wrong answer to the question "What should we
    do about modern frames that have such [censored] clearance?"

    --
    Dane Buson - [email hidden]
    Real Time, adj.:
    Here and now, as opposed to fake time, which only occurs there and then.

  6. Dane Buson said:

    650B really seems like the wrong answer to the question "What should we
    do about modern frames that have such [censored] clearance?"


    Well, get ready, Grant Petersen has another *solution* for both old and
    new "racing" frames that don't have clearance for fat tires (i.e., 32mm
    wide or larger) and fenders, he's currently soliciting funds to start
    up the 603mm rim and tire size.

    YES, 603mm is the middle ground between the current road size of 622mm
    and the mtb size of 559 (or was it 650B 584mm size?). In any event,
    Grant thinks the future is that all these "psuedo racers,
    Lance-wannabes" are getting up in age and will eventually want a fatter
    tire with fenders. This will make all these "racing" bikes more
    versatile and 603mm will solve this problem.

    Or, if you are in the market NOW, the Country Bike explosion is
    happening. Rivendell now sells the Saluki, Bleriot, Atlantis,
    Glorius/Wilbury mixtes, and the new Waterford-made A. Homer Hilsen.
    These are all bikes that can fit fat 32mm or wider tires with fenders
    and are design to be ridden both on the road and on trails. Other mfrs
    like Kogswell and Hampsten Cycles (Cycle Tournesol) are getting into it
    too.

    Have you got yours yet? If not, DO IT ALL, DO IT NOW! What are you
    waiting for?

  7. "bfd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dane Buson said:

    650B really seems like the wrong answer to the question "What should we
    do about modern frames that have such [censored] clearance?"


    Well, get ready, Grant Petersen has another *solution* for both old and
    new "racing" frames that don't have clearance for fat tires (i.e., 32mm
    wide or larger) and fenders, he's currently soliciting funds to start
    up the 603mm rim and tire size.

    YES, 603mm is the middle ground between the current road size of 622mm
    and the mtb size of 559 (or was it 650B 584mm size?). In any event,
    Grant thinks the future is that all these "psuedo racers,
    Lance-wannabes" are getting up in age and will eventually want a fatter
    tire with fenders. This will make all these "racing" bikes more
    versatile and 603mm will solve this problem.

    Or, if you are in the market NOW, the Country Bike explosion is
    happening. Rivendell now sells the Saluki, Bleriot, Atlantis,
    Glorius/Wilbury mixtes, and the new Waterford-made A. Homer Hilsen.
    These are all bikes that can fit fat 32mm or wider tires with fenders
    and are design to be ridden both on the road and on trails. Other mfrs
    like Kogswell and Hampsten Cycles (Cycle Tournesol) are getting into it
    too.

    The Kogswell is the bargain of the bunch. Come on, $500 for a
    frame/fork/fenders? That's a pretty decent price. QBP is offering a decent
    selection of 650B wheels, some even pre-built with Shimano dynohubs. If one
    were to shop Performance/Nashbar/Lickton's/eBay, etc, one could probably
    build a complete bike for a grand or so.
    I would still like to see a major manufacturer jump on the "Country
    Bike" bandwagon. I was expecting Bianchi to build one under Sky Yaeger,
    because it fit with their outside the box thinking. After the San Jose and
    Castro Valley were successful, a 650B bike would not have been unexpected.
    Maybe Trek?
    The concept of the country bike is one that should appeal to lots of
    people. Comfortable, durable, functional, multi-dimensional. Lots of boomers
    are getting older and stiffer and are heading toward "comfort road" bikes
    anyway. Why not sell them one that is really comfortable?

    Mike

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.