Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Phil Wood Bottom Bracket installed correctly?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 8 posts · 646 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 August 2006
Last activity
9 August 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
646
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello all,

    Thanks for your help in the topic:
    Phil Wood Bottom Brackets Interchangeable?

    I did get the Phil Wood bottom bracket with the
    Italian threads from Ebay. My bike has French threads.

    It was a very old bottom bracket, the people at the
    bike store said. Perhaps from the seventies.

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    The ring on the chainwheel side, is about 1/2 way in.
    The ring on the other side, is only about 1/3 of the way in.

    Question: is this ok? Or, should I worry, and buy
    another unit that would have a narrower sealed unit?
    That way, the rings would go in all the way, and there
    would be more threads to hold the unit in place.

    I have to say, it sure is smooth! And not a sound from
    the bottom bracket. So, when I pedal slowly down
    a quiet road, I hear the wonderful silence. Very Nice!
    I should have done this years ago.

  2. Not sure but 2mm is basically the width of a spoke and splitting it between
    r and l, I would think it doesn't matter much, esp as much as preventing the
    cups from going most of the way in.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    Thanks for your help in the topic:
    Phil Wood Bottom Brackets Interchangeable?

    I did get the Phil Wood bottom bracket with the
    Italian threads from Ebay. My bike has French threads.

    It was a very old bottom bracket, the people at the
    bike store said. Perhaps from the seventies.

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    The ring on the chainwheel side, is about 1/2 way in.
    The ring on the other side, is only about 1/3 of the way in.

    Question: is this ok? Or, should I worry, and buy
    another unit that would have a narrower sealed unit?
    That way, the rings would go in all the way, and there
    would be more threads to hold the unit in place.

    I have to say, it sure is smooth! And not a sound from
    the bottom bracket. So, when I pedal slowly down
    a quiet road, I hear the wonderful silence. Very Nice!
    I should have done this years ago.

  3. [email hidden said:

    "]Hello all,

    Thanks for your help in the topic:
    Phil Wood Bottom Brackets Interchangeable?

    I did get the Phil Wood bottom bracket with the
    Italian threads from Ebay. My bike has French threads.

    It was a very old bottom bracket, the people at the
    bike store said. Perhaps from the seventies.

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    The ring on the chainwheel side, is about 1/2 way in.
    The ring on the other side, is only about 1/3 of the way in.

    Question: is this ok? Or, should I worry, and buy
    another unit that would have a narrower sealed unit?
    That way, the rings would go in all the way, and there
    would be more threads to hold the unit in place.

    I have to say, it sure is smooth! And not a sound from
    the bottom bracket. So, when I pedal slowly down
    a quiet road, I hear the wonderful silence. Very Nice!
    I should have done this years ago.


    If more than 5 mm of thread is exposed outside the frame on either side you don't have a good fit. There are installation instruction for Phil Wood bottom brackets on the Phil Wood web site.

  4. Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    Thanks for your help in the topic:
    Phil Wood Bottom Brackets Interchangeable?

    I did get the Phil Wood bottom bracket with the
    Italian threads from Ebay. My bike has French threads.

    It was a very old bottom bracket, the people at the
    bike store said. Perhaps from the seventies.

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    The ring on the chainwheel side, is about 1/2 way in.
    The ring on the other side, is only about 1/3 of the way in.

    Question: is this ok? Or, should I worry, and buy
    another unit that would have a narrower sealed unit?
    That way, the rings would go in all the way, and there
    would be more threads to hold the unit in place.

    'Should' have the BB threads chased but finding a french tap ,is going
    to be tough to impossible. The cups 'should' be tight into the frame.
    Perhaps the shell is way undersized.

    Quoted message said:

    I have to say, it sure is smooth! And not a sound from
    the bottom bracket. So, when I pedal slowly down
    a quiet road, I hear the wonderful silence. Very Nice!
    I should have done this years ago.

  5. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    Thanks for your help in the topic:
    Phil Wood Bottom Brackets Interchangeable?

    I did get the Phil Wood bottom bracket with the
    Italian threads from Ebay. My bike has French threads.

    It was a very old bottom bracket, the people at the
    bike store said. Perhaps from the seventies.

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    Do the cups go all the way in with the BB cartridge
    not in the shell? You might do this just to clean
    up the threads a bit. Make sure the threads are really
    clean, a brass brush and a degreaser is good prep.

    Installing these can be a bit tricky the first time
    since the shoulder of the BB can stick on the
    ring. I've installed them on two different bikes and
    it took a quite a bit of force the first time to
    get the rings seated on the shoulder of the cartridge.
    There's kind of a catch-22 here, you want to push hard
    enough to fully seat the ring, but not hard enough to
    strip the threads as getting a French BB rethreaded will
    be very difficult.

    I would get a caliper and measure everything, BB shell
    width, BB cartridge width and ring width. Some simple
    arithmetic will give you some idea of how well the rings
    are seated on the cartridge. If the rings are well seated,
    I wouldn't worry much about the threads sticking out.

    _ Booker C. Bense

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.2

    iQCVAwUBRNibjGTWTAjn5N/lAQG/pwP/YpVgVQVb3ab0LFU20fkM7U0MNmt25+Up
    iZFRUnLk9bVtD1TVMsr78i3j38QpZ1TBUws7ftkPVMUrY/qBYLsmK88Ft60SPM13
    Ewr2eWtxX85HkdELilv30lpuuBqhMPGSfnbQvgM55fNIABsaBMxuDWrdScngkgJ2
    UoTAPECtlqU=
    =OT3y
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  6. Quoted message said:

    Hello all,

    It turned out that my spindle was 70mm in length.
    The Phil Wood was a little shorter; 68 mm.

    I got the French rings/cups, and the tools to install it.

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would start all over again. Take the BB out including the cups. Now
    Screw the cups in as far as it will go without the BB. This will tell
    you whether you have a threading problem in the BB shell. If the cups
    thread all the way in then my guess is that when you install the BB you
    aren't using enough force when screwing the two cups in. Another
    suggestion is to email Phil. They are always eager to help.

  7. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello all,


    <SNIP>

    Quoted message said:

    Interestingly, the cups would not go in very far. See here:

    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1828.jpg
    http://www.geocities.com/condor_222/dscn1830.jpg

    I would have expected that they would have gone in
    all the way. But the housing of the sealed unit
    prevents this.

    The ring on the chainwheel side, is about 1/2 way in.
    The ring on the other side, is only about 1/3 of the way in.

    Question: is this ok? Or, should I worry, and buy
    another unit that would have a narrower sealed unit?
    That way, the rings would go in all the way, and there
    would be more threads to hold the unit in place.


    <SNIP>

    On a 68mm shell, Phil Wood rings should stick out about 2mm (2 complete
    threads, since French is 1mm pitch) each side. From the look of the picture,
    I'd guess that the non-drive side of the cartridge is not correctly seated
    in the ring, since we should be able to see a little bit of spindle between
    the ring and the arm.

    2 other less likely explanations: your BB shell is too narrow, due to
    overzealous facing; or you have a not-that-common cartridge for a 73mm
    shell.

    I'd take it back apart, grease (at least) the shoulders of the cartridge,
    make sure the rings fit over them, measure the width of the assembly outside
    of the shell, then reassemble, and make sure that the rings are spaced as
    before.. Also, get some blue loc-tite, because with French threading, your
    chainline will creep out due to pedaling.

  8. Except for their very short special order bottom brackets - 96mm, 98mm,
    etc - the mounting rings on Phil BBs stick out a couple of mm each side of
    the BB shell.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.