UK and Europe · Public discussion

Radio 4 interview with Landis

Started by Nigel Cliffe · · Last activity · 9 posts · 434 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
8 August 2006
Last activity
8 August 2006
Original author
Nigel Cliffe
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
434
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and before the
    8 oclock weather forecast).

    --
    Nigel Cliffe,
    Webmaster at http://www.2mm.org.uk/

  2. Nigel Cliffe said:

    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and before the
    8 oclock weather forecast).

    He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather that address
    whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.

    Not once did he say he was innocent.
    I thought that was quite telling.

    John B

  3. quote='John B'Nigel Cliffe said:

    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and before the
    8 oclock weather forecast).

    He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather that address
    whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.

    Not once did he say he was innocent.
    I thought that was quite telling.

    John B[/QUOTE]

    Heard (presumabley they same) interview on Radio 5 just after 8. Comment from their reported was much the same. Landis is saying he has abnormally high testosterone, so where are his other failed tests. I certain respects he is correct though, if the UCI, and others start leaking results, they are breaking their own rules. One of the points made was that Gatlins failed test results became known 3 months later, Landis' a week later, and before the B test was analysed. What we don't want is Landis gettign off on a technicality.

    Bryan

  4. 8 Aug 2006 08:02 Nigel Cliffe said:


    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis
    on Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be
    on the Listen Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for
    the day and before the 8 oclock weather forecast).

    <http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today3_floyd_20060808.ram>

    Landis appears to be following the strategy that attack is the best
    form of defence.

    --
    Tim Forcer [email hidden]
    The University of Southampton, UK

    The University is not responsible for my opinions

  5. in message <[email hidden]>, Nigel Cliffe

    (') said:

    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis
    on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and
    before the 8 oclock weather forecast).

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today3_floyd_20060808.ram

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; Good grief, I can remember when England won the Ashes.

  6. John B said:


    Nigel Cliffe said:

    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and before the
    8 oclock weather forecast).

    He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather that address
    whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.

    Not once did he say he was innocent.
    I thought that was quite telling.

    He was very thrown by JH's question about him having said he had a
    naturally high level too....

  7. Dan Gregory said:
    John B said:


    Nigel Cliffe said:

    If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with Landis on
    Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the Listen
    Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day and
    before the
    8 oclock weather forecast).

    He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather that
    address
    whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.

    Not once did he say he was innocent.
    I thought that was quite telling.

    He was very thrown by JH's question about him having said he had a
    naturally high level too....

    I got the impression he was claiming that while the ratio was high the
    actual hormone level was low. Did anyone else pick up on that?

    --
    Roger Thorpe

    My email address is spamtrapped. You can work it out!

  8. in message <[email hidden]>, Roger Thorpe

    (') said:
    Dan Gregory said:
    John B said:


    Nigel Cliffe wrote:

    > If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with
    > Landis on
    > Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the
    > Listen Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day
    > and before the
    > 8 oclock weather forecast).

    He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather
    that address
    whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.

    Not once did he say he was innocent.
    I thought that was quite telling.

    I thought his performance in the interview was quite good - he came over
    as a basically straight, likeable guy in a situation he just wasn't
    experienced enough to cope with. A basically dishonest person would have
    been a lot slicker in the interview. However, he didn't persuade me he
    was innocent.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He was very thrown by JH's question about him having said he had a
    naturally high level too....

    I got the impression he was claiming that while the ratio was high the
    actual hormone level was low. Did anyone else pick up on that?

    He's right, it was. Which is why his earlier stories about having 'high
    natural testosterone' were a smoke screen.

    What I found unpersuasive was his claim that he didn't know about the
    11:1 ratio until a couple of days ago, while the rest of us have known
    it for ten days. That the UCI didn't officially tell him, I'll believe.
    That he didn't read it in the press (or his lawyers didn't brief him)?
    Come on, man, that cannot be true.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; It appears that /dev/null is a conforming XSL processor.

  9. Simon Brooke said:

    That the UCI didn't officially tell him, I'll believe.
    That he didn't read it in the press (or his lawyers didn't brief him)?

    knowing something and reading something in the press aren't necessarily
    the same thing ....

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.