in message <[email hidden]>, Roger Thorpe
(') said:Dan Gregory said:John B said:
Nigel Cliffe wrote:
> If following the Landis / TdF saga, there is an interview with
> Landis on
> Radio 4's Today programme for Tues 8th August. Should be on the
> Listen Again service, at around 7.50 (just after thought for the day
> and before the
> 8 oclock weather forecast).
He was very unconvincing, preferred to attack the 'system' rather
that address
whether or not he used any performance enhancing substances.
Not once did he say he was innocent.
I thought that was quite telling.
I thought his performance in the interview was quite good - he came over
as a basically straight, likeable guy in a situation he just wasn't
experienced enough to cope with. A basically dishonest person would have
been a lot slicker in the interview. However, he didn't persuade me he
was innocent.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:He was very thrown by JH's question about him having said he had a
naturally high level too....
I got the impression he was claiming that while the ratio was high the
actual hormone level was low. Did anyone else pick up on that?
He's right, it was. Which is why his earlier stories about having 'high
natural testosterone' were a smoke screen.
What I found unpersuasive was his claim that he didn't know about the
11:1 ratio until a couple of days ago, while the rest of us have known
it for ten days. That the UCI didn't officially tell him, I'll believe.
That he didn't read it in the press (or his lawyers didn't brief him)?
Come on, man, that cannot be true.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; It appears that /dev/null is a conforming XSL processor.