Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: What's the problem ?

Started by gds · · Last activity · 6 posts · 200 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 July 2006
Last activity
1 August 2006
Original author
gds
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
200
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. RonSonic said:

    The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    tactic.

    If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    Ron

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

  2. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    tactic.

    If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    Ron

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

    Yes, another nail in the coffin, let's see:
    1. 11:1 ratio
    2. Exogeneous testosterone with IRMS that Phonak somehow "forgets" to
    mention in their announcement
    3. Lawyer trashes proven IRMS method
    4. Playing for time

    Hopefully anyone with a brain will have now seen the light and written
    off that cheater. Best thing would now be for him to fess up to avoid
    going to Memmonite hell, that can't be much fun based on their life in
    this world.

  3. gds said:


    RonSonic said:

    The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    tactic.

    If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    Ron

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

    For me ASAP would be as soon as I could line up the heavyweights of biochemistry
    to observe and scrutinize.

    Ron

  4. Keith said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    tactic.

    If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    Ron

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

    Yes, another nail in the coffin, let's see:
    1. 11:1 ratio
    2. Exogeneous testosterone with IRMS that Phonak somehow "forgets" to
    mention in their announcement
    3. Lawyer trashes proven IRMS method
    4. Playing for time

    oops forgot one
    5. Saying they know the B sample will come back positive too...almost
    makes you think they knew they had it coming for the A one, but took a
    chance.

    Quoted message said:


    Hopefully anyone with a brain will have now seen the light and written
    off that cheater. Best thing would now be for him to fess up to avoid
    going to Memmonite hell, that can't be much fun based on their life in
    this world.

  5. RonSonic said:
    gds said:


    RonSonic said:

    The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    tactic.

    If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    Ron

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

    For me ASAP would be as soon as I could line up the heavyweights of biochemistry
    to observe and scrutinize.

    Ron

    Well we can all act as we wish. I'll stick with my explanation. As for
    yours, I'd imagine that in the current climate that all of the major
    teams have experts "on call." My gosh this is happening constantly; I
    don't know any well run business that doesn't have palns for what to do
    when things happen, especially expected plans. It's not like Phonak
    hasn't been here before.

  6. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    gds said:
    RonSonic said:
    gds said:

    RonSonic wrote:
    > The rules you just posted said he had a week. So what's this talk about delaying
    > tactic.
    >
    > If he's got a week, then he's got a week.

    True, but I guess if it were me and I believed I was innocent I'd be
    demanding the B test ASAP.

    For me ASAP would be as soon as I could line up the heavyweights of biochemistry
    to observe and scrutinize.

    Well we can all act as we wish. I'll stick with my explanation. As for
    yours, I'd imagine that in the current climate that all of the major
    teams have experts "on call." My gosh this is happening constantly; I
    don't know any well run business that doesn't have palns for what to do
    when things happen, especially expected plans. It's not like Phonak
    hasn't been here before.

    Yes, they have, and having been there so many times I
    infer that their experts and palns are most ineffective.

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.