House said:I will assume this is sarcasm, otherwise the first part is beyond stupid.
No sarcasm intended, at least for the first part.
I may be wrong but the arrival of 'hardshell' helmets seemed to correspond with Greg Lemond's usage but whether that was before or after his hunting exploits I know not (any hint of sarcasm intended).
The previously adopted 'soft' helmets, if made with leather and suitably padded, were perfectly able to provide adequate protection. The chin straps needed replacing from time to time but the actual helmet was durable, lasting and indeed, apart from the buckle, made of re-cycleable materials.
I would agree that some products on the market at that time were pretty much worthless, nothing more than a thin plastic skin with a synthetic sponge filler.
The quality leather helmets were available at a fraction of the prices charged for today's specimens and were sold without packaging, again another saving on natural resources.
I realise of course that after deducting the production costs of the helmet (the manufacturing process must spit them out like peas from a pod) and the colourful packaging, a good portion of the selling price goes towards team sponsorship.