Road Cycling · Public discussion

Jan sounds off

Started by Luke · · Last activity · 1 post · 357 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 July 2006
Last activity
18 July 2006
Original author
Luke
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
357
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From velonews.com (dated July 17)
    http://velonews.com/race/int/articles/10450.0.html

    "In any state of law everyone is innocent until proven guilty," Ullrich
    said. "My lawyers have asked the authorities in Spain if, and under
    what form, there is concrete evidence against me."

    Is this merely PR posturing? Why are Ullrich and his attorneys
    appealing to the Guardia Civil (== authorities?) when they've not
    charged him? AFAIK, the GC is under any no obligation to assent to this
    request if they don't formally proceed with a case -- i.e., he's
    charged. Wouldn't the fact that he, and the rest of the suspended
    riders, haven't attest that the evidence is presently not -- and may
    never be -- concrete?

    Contrary to his statement, vis the GC, Jan remains innocent; they
    didn't suspend him, T-Mobile did. He should turn to his own team for
    answers.

    Luke

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.