2. Less than 50% of starters will finish the race.
Not sure, but it seems unlikely if you're correct about #3
Quoted message said:
3. Will be one of the slowest avg. speeds in the past 10 years.
"one of" makes this a bit candy-assed. But only sort of, if you take my meaning. If it IS the lowest speed of the last 10 years, I'll buy you a beer and mail it to you. I think it's untrue because A) There's still plenty of others who didn't get caught and B) It's a relatively flat route.
"CowPunk" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
1. A sprinter will win the Tour GC
2. Less than 50% of starters will finish the race.
3. Will be one of the slowest avg. speeds in the past 10 years.
Numbers 2 & 3 seem to be in conflict. If the race is really slow I suspect that less riders will drop out or miss time cuts. Even the slowest riders can easily get over the mountains if the pace is slow and not worried about missing the cut.
I didn't say why they wouldn't finish. According to Horner the idea is to let them start the race then kick them out for maximum publicity.
The low avg. speed will be due to the small size of the peloton.
Frank Drackman said:
"CowPunk" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
1. A sprinter will win the Tour GC
2. Less than 50% of starters will finish the race.
3. Will be one of the slowest avg. speeds in the past 10 years.
Numbers 2 & 3 seem to be in conflict. If the race is really slow I suspect that less riders will drop out or miss time cuts. Even the slowest riders can easily get over the mountains if the pace is slow and not worried about missing the cut.