This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get some blood matches pretty fast:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed.
Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the individual riders cases also. Bill C
I think we all knew McQuaid made his statement knowing full-well that the CAS would nix this. That way, he gets to appear as being anti-dope, and no one gets penalized. Nice strategy!
Bill C said:
This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get some blood matches pretty fast:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed.
Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the individual riders cases also. Bill C
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get some blood matches pretty fast:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed.
Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the individual riders cases also. Bill C
CAS took the position that they could not act on press reports. When the police file is made public tomorrow, that may change things for a number of parties.
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get some blood matches pretty fast:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed.
Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the individual riders cases also. Bill C
CAS took the position that they could not act on press reports. When the police file is made public tomorrow, that may change things for a number of parties.
So allegations, without charges being filed, are enough to justly, brutally, penalize someone? Where do I sign up to make some against people I don't like? Worked well for the LAPD a while ago. If they want to file charges and hold them in pre-arraignment custody then I'm fine with that. Being able to destroy peoples careers on allegations was [censored] when McCarthy did it. It was [censored] when we stripped US citizens of their jobs and properties during WW2, and it would be [censored] now for something that's not even vaguely a threat. Just because it has been done, and can be done doesn't make it right! Bill C
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
B. Lafferty said:
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get some blood matches pretty fast:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed.
Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the individual riders cases also. Bill C
CAS took the position that they could not act on press reports. When the police file is made public tomorrow, that may change things for a number of parties.
So allegations, without charges being filed, are enough to justly, brutally, penalize someone? Where do I sign up to make some against people I don't like?
No. CAS made the correct decision, IMO. Tomorrow, with the release of the Spanish dossier, we'll have a completely different situation.
Quoted message said:
Worked well for the LAPD a while ago. If they want to file charges and hold them in pre-arraignment custody then I'm fine with that. Being able to destroy peoples careers on allegations was [censored] when McCarthy did it. It was [censored] when we stripped US citizens of their jobs and properties during WW2, and it would be [censored] now for something that's not even vaguely a threat. Just because it has been done, and can be done doesn't make it right! Bill C
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
B. Lafferty said:
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > This should put a major kink into booting everyone unless they get > some blood matches pretty fast: > > http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2006/jun06/jun29news3 > CAS ruled that the team of Alexandre Vinokourov will be able to > participate in the race. Belgian judge Guido de Croock decided the > matter, basing his sentence on the fact that no official information on > the team's links to the doping network had yet been revealed. > > Looks like CAS is going for the fair and just approach. Good for them! > I can see this also being interpreted as a shot across the bow in the > individual riders cases also. > Bill C > CAS took the position that they could not act on press reports. When the police file is made public tomorrow, that may change things for a number of parties.
So allegations, without charges being filed, are enough to justly, brutally, penalize someone? Where do I sign up to make some against people I don't like?
No. CAS made the correct decision, IMO. Tomorrow, with the release of the Spanish dossier, we'll have a completely different situation.
Quoted message said:
Worked well for the LAPD a while ago. If they want to file charges and hold them in pre-arraignment custody then I'm fine with that. Being able to destroy peoples careers on allegations was [censored] when McCarthy did it. It was [censored] when we stripped US citizens of their jobs and properties during WW2, and it would be [censored] now for something that's not even vaguely a threat. Just because it has been done, and can be done doesn't make it right! Bill C
How does leaked allegations differ from official allegations? They are still allegations with nothing proven. I seem to be the flaming liberal around here. That's scary. Bill C
