Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Polar Speed Sensor

Started by barnesd · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,229 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
23 June 2006
Last activity
25 June 2006
Original author
barnesd
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,229
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Have just bought a 725x and am going to install it later, have one quick question, you need to set the wheel size, however where do you need to install the magnets and sensor as you could put the correct wheel size in, however if the sensor was to close to the bottom of the wheel, surely this would change the increase frequency at which the magnets passed the sensor and give a false reading? A bit confused, Any help appreciated.

    David

  2. barnesd said:

    Have just bought a 725x and am going to install it later, have one quick question, you need to set the wheel size, however where do you need to install the magnets and sensor as you could put the correct wheel size in, however if the sensor was to close to the bottom of the wheel, surely this would change the increase frequency at which the magnets passed the sensor and give a false reading? A bit confused, Any help appreciated.

    David

    Umm... think about it. Doesn't matter where the magnet is, it still goes past the same amount of times - ie once per revolution of the wheel. The computer counts the number of times it goes past in a given timespan (the frequency), multiplies that by the number you programmed in (which equates to the diameter of the tyre, ie the distance travelled for one wheel revolution) and works out from that how fast you're going.
    The only difference position makes is to the speed the magnet itself has to travel in order to make a complete revolution – closer to the hub it will be travelling slower, closer to the rim, it'll be travelling faster. But the sensor doesn't care, because it's not counting magnet speed, it's counting the frequency at which it passes.
    There may be an argument to say closer to the hub is better as the magnet's moving more slowly so the sensor has more time to get a good strong count from it. But then the closer to the hub, the further the signal from the sensor has to go to the wrist unit, so you might get a problem there instead...

  3. d'oh

    Thanks

    Eastway82 said:

    Umm... think about it. Doesn't matter where the magnet is, it still goes past the same amount of times - ie once per revolution of the wheel. The computer counts the number of times it goes past in a given timespan (the frequency), multiplies that by the number you programmed in (which equates to the diameter of the tyre, ie the distance travelled for one wheel revolution) and works out from that how fast you're going.
    The only difference position makes is to the speed the magnet itself has to travel in order to make a complete revolution – closer to the hub it will be travelling slower, closer to the rim, it'll be travelling faster. But the sensor doesn't care, because it's not counting magnet speed, it's counting the frequency at which it passes.
    There may be an argument to say closer to the hub is better as the magnet's moving more slowly so the sensor has more time to get a good strong count from it. But then the closer to the hub, the further the signal from the sensor has to go to the wrist unit, so you might get a problem there instead...

  4. barnesd said:

    d'oh

    Thanks


    I like to install mine high up on the fork, right below the caliper, for a few reasons. 1. Superficial and subjective, but I think it looks better. 2. The speed sensor has a limit to how far it should be from the wrist unit. Too far and the unit might not pick it up. 3. the wheels I use have bladed spokes, but they are round near the nipples. The round spoke magent slides on nicely and stays put there.

  5. PeterF said:

    I like to install mine high up on the fork, right below the caliper, for a few reasons. 1. Superficial and subjective, but I think it looks better. 2. The speed sensor has a limit to how far it should be from the wrist unit. Too far and the unit might not pick it up. 3. the wheels I use have bladed spokes, but they are round near the nipples. The round spoke magent slides on nicely and stays put there.

    The problem I have with putting the CS200 sensor at the top of the fork leg is that the magnet then has to be put at an extreme angle, and/or the sensor has to be turned a long way in to get it close enough to the magnet. Someone on another thread suggested getting rare earth magnets from radio shack or similar for more tolerance between sensor and magnet, so I might try that.

  6. Eastway82 said:

    The problem I have with putting the CS200 sensor at the top of the fork leg is that the magnet then has to be put at an extreme angle, and/or the sensor has to be turned a long way in to get it close enough to the magnet. Someone on another thread suggested getting rare earth magnets from radio shack or similar for more tolerance between sensor and magnet, so I might try that.


    I used a Sigma Sport computer before, and actually use their wheel magnets with my Polar. They work fine. Where you place the sensor does have a lot to do with the shape of the fork as well as the alignment of the spokes.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.