"Gadget" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I had a minor accident last night on my way home, involving me and a dodgy cycle path. I'm not
sure how many know the A10 (AKA: The Great Cambridge Road). In between Bury Street and Lincoln
Road there is a hill/bridge near
a
Quoted message said:school. It was on this stretch that incident happened. As I was going up
the
Quoted message said:hill toward Lincoln Road I had to skirt a few trees that the council had decided to put in the
cycle path. The cycle path is shared with the pavement, so going around the trees put me on the
pavement. After going around the tree I went to get back on the cycle path but there was an
unseen
Quoted message said:gap between pavement and path just wide enough to accommodate my front
tyre.
Quoted message said:(I had road slicks on the bike, so they were narrow tyres) My bike comes
to
Quoted message said:a sudden halt and I'm thrown from the bike, injuring my right wrist and right ankle. Nothing
serious though, just a sprain. It could have been worse, if it weren't for the crash barrier I
would have been thrown into
on
Quoted message said:coming traffic. This happened at 10:30 at night so the traffic weren't
heavy
Quoted message said:but there was the traffic. After dusting myself off, I inspect the bike. Both the tyres ended up
in the groove/rut and are now flat. Because of the time of night I couldn't do an extensive
assessment but I believe the
front
Quoted message said:rim has buckled and I did hear a click as I came off bike so that has to
be
Quoted message said:checked. I'm going to take photos of the bike and of the path. My question is do I have any chance
claiming compensation for this from the people who are meant to maintain the path and who would
those people be?
Any help would be appreciated.
Many Thanks
Gadget
Sorry to hear about your misfortune.
Your success or otherwise in making a claim will depend upon the level of competence of the highway
authority (or it's contractor). If the highway authority has a record of inspecting this particular
length of track and did not record any defects at the last inspection then the highway authority can
reject your claim. (assuming the inspection regime is reasonable). This is the HA's statutory
defence and is used to stop people deliberately vandalising the highway and then making spurious
claims. It has to be said that a rural footpath / cycle path may only be inspected twice a year and
this would be accepted in court as reasonable.
Claims procedures vary from authority to authority but most HA's are now much more on the ball
following a rise in the number of claims and the competence of those making the claims. Bear in mind
they are protecting public money in defending your claim. Having said that very few HA's will try to
defend the indefensible and I would expect most to pay a reasonable claim promptly.
Don't attempt taking an HA to court unless you are very sure of your case. The company I work for
has dealt with a large number of claims against HA's and have yet to see the HA's we work for lose
one that has gone to court.
Let me know if you would like some more advice about the sort of evidence you should attempt to
gather prior to taking legal advice (unless you're wealthy enough to not worry about the cost of
legal advice!).
Matt