bad stats...

On Tue, 30 May 2006 05:25:18 GMT, Dusty
<[email hidden]> wrote:

|currently 290/250
|
|I actually had the weight loss during April in about 2 weeks. I'm not
|really trying to lose yet,
|if that makes any sense. I was just trying to start eating again,
|without putting weight back
|on.

? Why?

Marengo said:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 05:25:18 GMT, Dusty
<[email hidden]> wrote:

|currently 290/250
|
|I actually had the weight loss during April in about 2 weeks. I'm not
|really trying to lose yet,
|if that makes any sense. I was just trying to start eating again,
|without putting weight back
|on.

? Why?

She's in recovery from a brown recluse bite (that was the source of the
40 pound loss in April - mentioned in another post). I take it she'd
like to sort of "get her feet under her" before progressing to weight
loss.

Carmen

Marengo said:

On Tue, 30 May 2006 05:25:18 GMT, Dusty
<[email hidden]> wrote:

|currently 290/250
|
|I actually had the weight loss during April in about 2 weeks. I'm not
|really trying to lose yet,
|if that makes any sense. I was just trying to start eating again,
|without putting weight back
|on.
? Why?

Because I lost that 40 lbs when i was bitten by a brown recluse, spent
weeks with 104 fever, a month bedridden, and another month barely able
to walk. I figure that my body should reach some kind of
equilibrium--EVEN though when I was able to eat again, I have been on
Atkins woe. The point is that a loss of 40 lbs during a couple of
weeks literally from sickness and starvation is NOT healthy weight
loss, nor is it a weight loss one could maintain. So it would be
unreasonable for me to expect to continue losing without a hitch.
Every day I am able to eat and NOT gain is essentially still weight
loss.