Road Cycling · Public discussion

Segway recall!!!

Started by Karen M. · · Last activity · 13 posts · 1,161 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 September 2003
Last activity
30 September 2003
Original author
Karen M.
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,161
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hallelulah!

    --Karen M.

    Recall Sidetracks Segway Scooters

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2003

    (CBS/AP) The maker of the Segway Human Transporter has agreed to recall the motorized scooters
    because riders have been injured falling off when its batteries are low.

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the recall Friday, saying that three people had
    been injured. One suffered a head wound and needed stitches.

    "Under certain operating conditions, particularly when the batteries are near the end of charge,
    some Segway HTs may not deliver enough power, allowing the rider to fall," the CPSC warned. "This
    can happen if the rider speeds up abruptly, encounters an obstacle, or continues to ride after
    receiving a low-battery alert."

    The Manchester, N.H.-based company has sold about 6,000 of the scooters so far. The recall involves
    all Segway HT i167 ("i Series"😉 models sold to consumers. Two models sold in test markets — the e167
    and p133 models — are also being recalled. Customers can call 877-889-9020 for information on
    getting a free upgrade.

    "Riders are reminded that, even after the software upgrade, appropriate operating techniques as
    described in Segway HT user materials are essential to safety," the CPSC warned. ....

  2. "Karen M." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hallelulah!

    --Karen M.

    Recall Sidetracks Segway Scooters

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2003

    (CBS/AP) The maker of the Segway Human Transporter has agreed to

    <<snip..>>

    Quoted message said:

    materials are essential to safety," the CPSC warned. ....

    I find this somewhat interesting because this is the first time I've seen a number as to how many
    units have been manufactured (not necessarily sold..). I'm impressed they've made 6000..I thought
    600 would be a more likely number. I wonder what percentage were paid for?

    Cheers,

    Scott..

  3. Even if all 6,000 were paid for, that's nothing. This is the kind of technology toy ( or a clever
    solution to a virtually non-existent problem, as I like to think of it) with plenty of hype behind
    it, that there are plenty of affluent people eager to buy when it first comes out.

    On the other hand, someone saw a profile of their operation/factory on TV and said it looked so
    small, that they may be production-limited.

    - GRL

    "It's good to want things."

    Steve Barr (philosopher, poet, humorist, chemist, Visual Basic programmer) "S.
    Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Karen M." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hallelulah!

    --Karen M.

    Recall Sidetracks Segway Scooters

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2003

    (CBS/AP) The maker of the Segway Human Transporter has agreed to

    <<snip..>>

    Quoted message said:

    materials are essential to safety," the CPSC warned. ....

    I find this somewhat interesting because this is the first time I've seen


    a

    Quoted message said:

    number as to how many units have been manufactured (not necessarily


    sold..).

    Quoted message said:

    I'm impressed they've made 6000..I thought 600 would be a more likely number. I wonder what
    percentage were paid for?

    Cheers,

    Scott..

  4. GRL said:

    Even if all 6,000 were paid for, that's nothing. This is the kind of technology toy ( or a clever
    solution to a virtually non-existent problem, as I like to think of it) with plenty of hype behind
    it, that there are plenty of affluent people eager to buy when it first comes out.

    On the other hand, someone saw a profile of their operation/factory on TV and said it looked so
    small, that they may be production-limited.

    - GRL

    We've got a company here that rents them. I happened to be riding by when they were out doing a
    little tourist trip with a group. I asked the salesman what advantage they had over a bike. He
    initially answered, "Nothing," but in ensuing discussion we realized that Segways are good for those
    not in shape, and for commuters who don't want to change/shower. You can ride one in a suit and not
    get it all sweaty.

    More power to 'em. Electricity is cleaner than ICEs in certain important ways. Replacing half the
    cars on city streets with Segways (or bikes) would be a good thing.

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace xmission.com~lawall "I'm not proud. We really haven't done everything we
    could to protect our customers. Our products just aren't engineered for security." --Microsoft VP in
    charge of Windows OS Development, Brian Valentine.

  5. "Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    More power to 'em. Electricity is cleaner than ICEs in certain important ways. Replacing half the
    cars on city streets with Segways (or bikes) would be a good thing.

    But they won't replace cars. They will replace walking. If wildly successful, they might make a dent
    in public transportation (taxis for cross-town errands, etc.).

    RichC

  6. Rich Clark said:

    But they won't replace cars. They will replace walking. If wildly successful, they might make a
    dent in public transportation (taxis for cross-town errands, etc.).

    I could see them as very useful for the USPS, in large factories, mall security, etc...

    Barry

  7. B a r r y B u r k e J r . said:
    Rich Clark said:

    But they won't replace cars. They will replace walking. If wildly successful, they might make a
    dent in public transportation (taxis for cross-town errands, etc.).

    I could see them as very useful for the USPS, in large factories, mall security, etc...

    Barry

    The post office is testing them for mail delivery in San Francisco, particularly on hilly routes.
    The mail bags are mounted on the vehicle. I've read that Segway also plans to have an attachment to
    allow it to haul an 80 lb load (this is probably some sort of trailer, I would guess.)

    --
    My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

  8. Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:29:52 GMT, <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Bill

    Z.) said:

    The post office is testing them for mail delivery in San Francisco, particularly on hilly routes.
    The mail bags are mounted on the vehicle

    I heard the letter carriers testing them didn't like them when the weather got chilly. Walking helps
    keep them warmer.
    --
    zk

  9. Quoted message said:

    More power to 'em. Electricity is cleaner than ICEs in certain important ways. Replacing half the
    cars on city streets with Segways (or bikes) would be a good thing.

    Have you taken into account the environmental impact of electricity generation - don't the power
    stations 'export' their pollutants whereas cars keep theirs local?

  10. VERNON LEVY said:
    Quoted message said:

    More power to 'em. Electricity is cleaner than ICEs in certain important ways. Replacing half the
    cars on city streets with Segways (or bikes) would be a good thing.

    Have you taken into account the environmental impact of electricity generation - don't the power
    stations 'export' their pollutants whereas cars keep theirs local?

    Yes, that's why I qualified my assertion. One advantage of power plants is that they concentrate
    their pollution, making it more manageable.

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace xmission.com~lawall "I'm not proud. We really haven't done everything we
    could to protect our customers. Our products just aren't engineered for security." --Microsoft VP in
    charge of Windows OS Development, Brian Valentine.

  11. I thought that San Francisco had passed an ordinance banning Segways from Sidewalks. Perhaps I
    am mistaken?

    <<SNIP>>

    Quoted message said:

    The post office is testing them for mail delivery in San Francisco, particularly on hilly routes.
    The mail bags are mounted on the vehicle. I've read that Segway also plans to have an attachment
    to allow it to haul an 80 lb load (this is probably some sort of trailer, I would guess.)

    -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- newsfeeds.comnewsfeeds.com - The #1
    Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    More power to 'em. Electricity is cleaner than ICEs in certain important ways. Replacing half
    the cars on city streets with Segways (or bikes) would be a good thing.

    Have you taken into account the environmental impact of electricity generation - don't the power
    stations 'export' their pollutants whereas cars keep theirs local?

    The overall efficiency of energy conversion can be higher in a well- designed electric vehicle than
    in ICE's because of the latter's poor thermal efficiency. When combined with the sophisiticated
    emissions- reducing equipment in a commercial power plant, higher efficiency typically (not always,
    of course) means fewer total emissions.

    --
    Dave Kerber Fight spam: remove the ns_ from the return address before replying!

    REAL programmers write self-modifying code.

  13. Karen M. said:

    Hallelulah!

    --Karen M.

    Recall Sidetracks Segway Scooters

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 26, 2003

    (CBS/AP) The maker of the Segway Human Transporter has agreed to recall the motorized scooters
    because riders have been injured falling off when its batteries are low.

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the recall Friday, saying that three people had
    been injured. One suffered a head wound and needed stitches.

    "Under certain operating conditions, particularly when the batteries are near the end of charge,
    some Segway HTs may not deliver enough power, allowing the rider to fall," the CPSC warned. "This
    can happen if the rider speeds up abruptly, encounters an obstacle, or continues to ride after
    receiving a low-battery alert."

    The Manchester, N.H.-based company has sold about 6,000 of the scooters so far. The recall
    involves all Segway HT i167 ("i Series"😉 models sold to consumers. Two models sold in test markets
    — the e167 and p133 models — are also being recalled. Customers can call 877-889-9020 for
    information on getting a free upgrade.

    "Riders are reminded that, even after the software upgrade, appropriate operating techniques as
    described in Segway HT user materials are essential to safety," the CPSC warned. ....

    My favorite bicycle quote:

    --
    To attack the pedals may be strenuous over the short run, but it is an expression of trust in one's
    own powers, for with the bicycle everything depends on the self. ~Wolfgang Sachs
    --
    That's what I love about the bicycle.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.