General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

race report: 5k (almost)

Started by Donovan Rebbech · · Last activity · 4 posts · 596 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 September 2003
Last activity
30 September 2003
Original author
Donovan Rebbech
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
596
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After a layoff due to achilles tendon problems, I'm up and running again. No, they are not
    completely better yet (sigh) but it seems I'm able to run long and run hard without them bothering
    me too much.

    My first race back was a slow and painful 10k, which at a time of 45:58, was my slowest pace of any
    race this year (including a 10 miler) despite the flat course.

    Just a week later, after a small amount of training and a very short "speed workout" (4 200m runs in
    about 36 seconds on a track), I ran a face saving mile in 5:28 already reported by Globadisc.

    On Thurs, there was a 5k run in the financial district of Manhattan. I was shooting for a fast time
    on this -- I knew in advance that the course was going to be flatter than the 5k course they use in
    central park, so it would be a good chance to run a fast time. My training had been going reasonably
    well, so I figured that combined with a fast course, this could produce a good time.

    I rabbited the largely downhill start, passing the (probably misplaced) first mile marker in 5:17.
    Never saw the second mile marker. Did they have one ? I don't know. Held onto the pack for the rest
    of the race, and ran as hard as I could for the last 400m.

    My finishing time was 18:27. So I was thinking -- yes! a Sub 19 , and less than 6 min per mile!
    (haven't run a sub 19 5k this year) Well it turns out that they later announced that, and I quote:

    Due to unscheduled emergency utility construction, race officials were forced to make
    last-minute changes to the race course. This resulted in a shortening of the course by
    approximately 400 feet.

    That's too bad, it seems downtown race in general this year have been fairly poorly organised,
    partly due to the ongoing reconstruction in that area.

    My time still extrapolates to sub 19 (though slightly more than 6min/mile). But the sub-19 will have
    to wait until another day, in fact probably until next year. In the meantime, I'm going to try my
    luck on some of the upcoming 4 milers.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  2. You still won't part with those crappoy nikes, will you?

    Donovan Rebbechi said:


    After a layoff due to achilles tendon problems, I'm up and running again. No, they are not
    completely better yet (sigh) but it seems I'm able to run long and run hard without them bothering
    me too much.

    My first race back was a slow and painful 10k, which at a time of 45:58, was my slowest pace of any
    race this year (including a 10 miler) despite the flat course.

    Just a week later, after a small amount of training and a very short "speed workout" (4 200m runs
    in about 36 seconds on a track), I ran a face saving mile in 5:28 already reported by Globadisc.

    On Thurs, there was a 5k run in the financial district of Manhattan. I was shooting for a fast time
    on this -- I knew in advance that the course was going to be flatter than the 5k course they use in
    central park, so it would be a good chance to run a fast time. My training had been going
    reasonably well, so I figured that combined with a fast course, this could produce a good time.

    I rabbited the largely downhill start, passing the (probably misplaced) first mile marker in 5:17.
    Never saw the second mile marker. Did they have one ? I don't know. Held onto the pack for the rest
    of the race, and ran as hard as I could for the last 400m.

    My finishing time was 18:27. So I was thinking -- yes! a Sub 19 , and less than 6 min per mile!
    (haven't run a sub 19 5k this year) Well it turns out that they later announced that, and I quote:

    Due to unscheduled emergency utility construction, race officials were forced to make
    last-minute changes to the race course. This resulted in a shortening of the course by
    approximately 400 feet.

    That's too bad, it seems downtown race in general this year have been fairly poorly organised,
    partly due to the ongoing reconstruction in that area.

    My time still extrapolates to sub 19 (though slightly more than 6min/mile). But the sub-19 will
    have to wait until another day, in fact probably until next year. In the meantime, I'm going to try
    my luck on some of the upcoming 4 milers.

    Cheers,

  3. In article said:

    You still won't part with those crappoy nikes, will you?

    Currently running in Saucony grid trigon, probably will move to Mizuno Wave Rider as my speed shoe.
    Before that I ran in New Balance 806/805. Future shoe plans are to stick with Saucony and Mizuno.

    I'm not a big fan of Nike shoes either (though their MP3 player is nice).

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  4. In article Donovan Rebbechi said:

    After a layoff due to achilles tendon problems, I'm up and running again. No, they are not
    completely better yet (sigh) but it seems I'm able to run long and run hard without them bothering
    me too much.

    My finishing time was 18:27. So I was thinking -- yes! a Sub 19 , and less than 6 min per mile!
    (haven't run a sub 19 5k this year) Well it turns out that they later announced that, and I quote:

    Due to unscheduled emergency utility construction, race officials were forced to make
    last-minute changes to the race course. This resulted in a shortening of the course by
    approximately 400 feet.

    My time still extrapolates to sub 19 (though slightly more than 6min/mile). But the sub-19 will
    have to wait until another day, in fact probably until next year. In the meantime, I'm going to try
    my luck on some of the upcoming 4 milers.

    Congratulations, Donovan! Maybe it wasn't quite sub-19, but with the achilles still not 100% I'm
    sure you'll get under it very soon. Glad to hear that running and racing aren't bothing it much now!
    Sorry to hear that the race organizers screwed up, that's pretty disappointing to tell you *after*
    the fact. But you did great!

    Teresa in AZ

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.