Gone freeriding...

Quoted message said:

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

That would be "labels"...

(Stephen Baker) said:

Quoted message said:

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

That would be "labels"...

Thanks Miriam...

Dave W said:

Could it be that I'm not such an [censored] for caring enough not to ride the wet trails today? na,
couldn't be that!

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

Then why not call yourself a catfish? There are reasons for calling things what they are; if you
want to be one thing and call yourself another, don't be surprised if people find it rather stupid.

--
-BB- To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)

Quoted message said:

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

If you're not constrained by lame labels then why have you just kicked off a new thread about the
semantics of the word "Freeriding"?

Andy Chequer, rider of bicycles, stick your labels.

BB said:

Dave W said:

Could it be that I'm not such an [censored] for caring enough not to ride the wet trails today? na,
couldn't be that!

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

Then why not call yourself a catfish?

because I am a human being, not some bottom feeding fish. What about you, are you a sucker fish? No,
then I wouldn't think to call you one...

Quoted message said:

There are reasons for calling things what they are;

absolutley, but there are more reasons (at least to me) for using the proper terms, and not to jump
on someone's elses bandwagon. Call off trail riders what they are. Idiotic, moronic, worthless piles
of [censored]. But to use the term freerider for those mentioned above, well that's just stupid

Quoted message said:

if you want to be one thing and call yourself another, don't be surprised if people find it
rather stupid.

Oh I'm not surprized. People can be rather stupid (right Mr. President?) And people who use
inapropriate terms to convey what they think they mean are just that, rather stupid

Dave

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:19:57 -0700, "Andy Chequer"

andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com said:

Quoted message said:

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

If you're not constrained by lame labels then why have you just kicked off a new thread about the
semantics of the word "Freeriding"?

Andy Chequer, rider of bicycles, stick your labels.

Gee Andy, I thought the point of the thread was to point out the flaw that has been perpetuated for
far too long. Sorry you didn't get that part. I'll try to write in more "understandable" terms for
those of you with reading comprehension problems.

Maybe something in the vein of Dr. Seuss will help?

Dave (I do not like Green Eggs & Ham)

I think you mean urban assault.

Fire up MTB 03

Quoted message said:

I think you mean urban assault.

Fire up MTB 03

oh, so you're another one hung up with labels too, huh?

Call it what you like, but you have to admit they (freeride/urban assaullt) have the alot of the
same attributes.

Dave (FREE to RIDE my bike)

"Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:19:57 -0700, "Andy Chequer"

andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com said:

Quoted message said:

Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

If you're not constrained by lame labels then why have you just kicked

off a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

new thread about the semantics of the word "Freeriding"?

Andy Chequer, rider of bicycles, stick your labels.

Gee Andy, I thought the point of the thread was to point out the flaw that has been perpetuated
for far too long. Sorry you didn't get that part. I'll try to write in more "understandable" terms
for those of you with reading comprehension problems.

Maybe something in the vein of Dr. Seuss will help?

Dave (I do not like Green Eggs & Ham)

1) In one thread you say you're a freerider.

2) In the next thread you say you're not constrained by labels.

Andy Chequer I do not like them Sam-I-am ;-)

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:55:31 -0700, "Andy Chequer"

andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com said:

"Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:19:57 -0700, "Andy Chequer"

andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com said:

> Dave (not constrained by your lame lables)

If you're not constrained by lame labels then why have you just kicked

off a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

new thread about the semantics of the word "Freeriding"?

Andy Chequer, rider of bicycles, stick your labels.

Gee Andy, I thought the point of the thread was to point out the flaw that has been perpetuated
for far too long. Sorry you didn't get that part. I'll try to write in more "understandable"
terms for those of you with reading comprehension problems.

Maybe something in the vein of Dr. Seuss will help?

Dave (I do not like Green Eggs & Ham)

1) In one thread you say you're a freerider.

Because I am FREE to RIDE, that's the defintion I prefer, You? Besides it helped illustrate the
point that labels are lame.

Quoted message said:

2) In the next thread you say you're not constrained by labels.

see above...

Quoted message said:

Andy Chequer I do not like them Sam-I-am ;-)

Dave W said:

Dave W said:

duffused,

uh, diffused.

Sorry, not this time Miriam.

O.k, maybe this time MERRIAM

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

1) In one thread you say you're a freerider.

Because I am FREE to RIDE, that's the defintion I prefer, You? Besides it helped illustrate the
point that labels are lame.

You're also free to go to the toilet - doesn't make you a freecrapper, does it?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

2) In the next thread you say you're not constrained by labels.

see above...

David you are a very silly person.

Andy Chequer

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:22:04 -0700, "Andy Chequer"

andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

1) In one thread you say you're a freerider.

Because I am FREE to RIDE, that's the defintion I prefer, You? Besides it helped illustrate the
point that labels are lame.

You're also free to go to the toilet - doesn't make you a freecrapper, does it?

unless I'm constipated, which you seem to be.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

2) In the next thread you say you're not constrained by labels.

see above...

David you are a very silly person.

Andy Chequer

Thank you Andy. Thank you very much. It's usenet, get over it.

Dave W said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:22:04 -0700, "Andy Chequer"
<andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Thank you Andy. Thank you very much. It's usenet, get over it.

Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?

...and the hits keep on a comin'

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:22:04 -0700, "Andy Chequer"
<andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Thank you Andy. Thank you very much. It's usenet, get over it.

Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?

Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
other any longer. When's the last time he and I have crossed path's here? hmm? c'mon when?

Oh, I see. You're trying to get us to cross swords here again huh? typical pissant loser move on
your part, I must say. But it ain't going to happen. Especially when he has you nut suckers to do
his bidding for him (and not very well I might add)

So tell us Pete, what are your motives, trying to protect your lover or something?

Quoted message said:

...and the hits keep on a comin'

And they will continue to do so. Nothing you can do to stop, so quit smelling my ass would ya..

Dave W said:

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:22:04 -0700, "Andy Chequer"
<andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Thank you Andy. Thank you very much. It's usenet, get over it.

Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?

Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
other any longer. When's the last time he and I have crossed path's here? hmm? c'mon when?

Again, "Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?"

Which part of that are you struggling with?

Quoted message said:

Oh, I see. You're trying to get us to cross swords here again huh?

Just laughing at your antics again.

Quoted message said:

typical pissant loser move on your part, I must say.

So people who laugh at you are pissant losers? I guess this should be changed to
alt.pissant-losers then.

But it ain't

Quoted message said:

going to happen. Especially when he has you nut suckers to do his bidding for him (and not very
well I might add)

Paranoia is so unbecoming. Funny, but unbecoming.

Quoted message said:

So tell us Pete, what are your motives, trying to protect your lover or something?

Just laughing at your antics. Why do you think that all of the folks who recognize your lack of
intelligence and spinlessness are out to defend JD, or are his lovers (nice bit of homophobia
there BTW)?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

...and the hits keep on a comin'

And they will continue to do so. Nothing you can do to stop, so quit smelling my ass would ya..

I have no doubt that you will continue to post pap while flailing around spectacularly.

pete fagerlin

::Revolutionary! Evolutionary! Yet so retro! :www.yestubes.com

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:32:49 -0400, Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:22:04 -0700, "Andy Chequer"
><andy@(removethisbittosend)thisisasparagus.com> wrote:

>Thank you Andy. Thank you very much. It's usenet, get over it.

Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?

Hey PETEY, in case you haven't been paying attention me and the mountain god don't engage each
other any longer. When's the last time he and I have crossed path's here? hmm? c'mon when?

Again, "Just like you've "gotten over" JD dozens of times?"

Which part of that are you struggling with?

Well apparently I have gotten over it, you seem to want it to keep going give it a rest o.k Petey!

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Oh, I see. You're trying to get us to cross swords here again huh?

Just laughing at your antics again.

laugh away. no law against that. As a matter of fact I welcome it, lord knows laughter is a good
thing. Hell I laugh at your schtick all the time, here and elsewhere...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

typical pissant loser move on your part, I must say.

So people who laugh at you are pissant losers? I guess this should be changed to
alt.pissant-losers then.

No Petey, just you my friend, just you...hehehehehe

Quoted message said:

But it ain't

Quoted message said:

going to happen. Especially when he has you nut suckers to do his bidding for him (and not very
well I might add)

Paranoia is so unbecoming. Funny, but unbecoming.

No paranoia involved, simple truth's Petey.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

So tell us Pete, what are your motives, trying to protect your lover or something?

Just laughing at your antics. Why do you think that all of the folks who recognize your lack of
intelligence and spinlessness are out to defend JD, or are his lovers (nice bit of homophobia
there BTW)?

And your point is? It appears you don't know what the terms mean.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

...and the hits keep on a comin'

And they will continue to do so. Nothing you can do to stop, so quit smelling my ass would ya..

I have no doubt that you will continue to post pap while flailing around spectacularly.

and I have no doubts that you will keep trying to sniff my ass, so where does that leave us PETEY?
I'm not intelligent, and your an ass sniffing post humper.

I know which I'd rather be..

Dave

Dave W said:

Quoted message said:

I have no doubt that you will continue to post pap while flailing around spectacularly.

and I have no doubts that you will keep trying to sniff my ass, so where does that leave us PETEY?
I'm not intelligent, and your an ass sniffing post humper.

Thanks for proving my point.

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

Quoted message said:

I have no doubt that you will continue to post pap while flailing around spectacularly.

and I have no doubts that you will keep trying to sniff my ass, so where does that leave us PETEY?
I'm not intelligent, and your an ass sniffing post humper.

Thanks for proving my point.

right back atcha ass sniffing piost humper