kettlewon2001 said:I faced the same issues recently. LBS's suggest the new ride versus the upgrades, even when I tell them I love the frame and all it contributes. What they do not realize is the issue of spending $2500.00 now, or over a period of time, which "add on's" offer - upgrading over time. Keep in mind however that not everything is interchangeable, especially with a original lower end bike.
well if you love the frame, it's a little different, and it's definitely true that incremental upgrading is easier to manage from month to month, but the mark-up on individual components is much higher than when manufacturers buy thousands of them or if you buy a group or "gruppo"; it just doesn't make much sense to replace some of the main components that are not worn out just for an "upgrade" like change shimano 105 brakes for dura ace: you'll save less weight than a power bar and stop no faster. you will have a nicer finish on your brakes, and some of the best available, but if you put your $200 in the I'm savin for a new bike fund...then the one day you decide that maybe you need a new frame or bike (because the old one is "fatigued" rolleyes), you'll be ready.
it's a little easier to justify if you bought a bike that gave you a great frame and they saved on the parts to get it to a certain price point, and there is an obviously weak point, then go for it, but if it's the crank, the derailleurs, the shifters, the wheels, the handlebars... well do the math. seats and pedals are different since they usually suck or don't fit your body and will easily go on to a new bike, as will the wheels if you don't change shifting systems, but most other stuff, if you pay full retail, is a sign of upgraditus and the only hope for cure is a new bike (but then the cycle starts again, and hopefully your income is increasing and other obligations like mortgages are not increasing!)