Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Statistics?

Started by Mike S. · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,034 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
26 September 2003
Last activity
3 October 2003
Original author
Mike S.
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,034
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hey, anyone ever track the severity of crashes that cause helmeted riders going to the hospital? Has
    there been a reduction in the severity of accidents, even though there hasn't been a drop in the
    actual number of cases?

    If I missed this in the helmet thread, I apologize.

    Mike

  2. "Mike S." <mikeshaw2@coxDOTnet> wrote in message news:Vx0db.23422$vj2.13489@fed1read06...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey, anyone ever track the severity of crashes that cause helmeted


    riders

    Quoted message said:

    going to the hospital? Has there been a reduction in the severity of accidents, even though there
    hasn't been a drop in the actual number


    of

    Quoted message said:

    cases?

    Mike:

    If you have the energy, you can search the medical literature for this info. Try:

    ncbi.nlm.nih.govPubMed

    Search for "bicycle helmet" as an easy starter. You'll find several hundred papers on the issue,
    mostly re children, but plenty of adult studies. I pasted a review article below.

    Readers who scrutinize the studies' methodologies may disagree with the conclusions, but the
    conventional wisdom says injury severity is reduced with helmets.

    Cheers,

    Tom

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001855. Related Articles, Links

    Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):738-40.

    Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists.

    Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson R.

    Pediatrics; Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, Box 359960,
    325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. [email hidden]

    BACKGROUND: Each year, in the United states, approximately 900 persons die from injuries due to
    bicycle crashes and over 500,000 persons are treated in emergency departments. Head injury is by far
    the greatest risk posed to bicyclists, comprising one-third of emergency department visits,
    two-thirds of hospital admissions, and three-fourths of deaths. Facial injuries to cyclists occur at
    a rate nearly identical to that of head injuries. Although it makes inherent sense that helmets
    would be protective against head injury, establishing the real-world effectiveness of helmets is
    important. A number of case-control studies have been conducted demonstrating the effectiveness of
    bicycle helmets. Because of the magnitude of the problem and the potential effectiveness of bicycle
    helmets, the objective of this review is to determine whether bicycle helmets reduce head, brain and
    facial injury for bicyclists of all ages involved in a bicycle crash or fall. OBJECTIVES: To
    determine whether bicycle helmets reduce head, brain and facial injury for bicyclists of all ages
    involved in a bicycle crash or fall. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Controlled Trials
    Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sport, ERIC, NTIS, Expanded Academic Index, CINAHL, PsycINFO,
    Occupational Safety and Health, and Dissertations Abstracts. We checked reference lists of past
    reviews and review articles, studies from government agencies in the United States, Europe and
    Australia, and contacted colleagues from the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury
    Prevention, World Injury Network, CDC funded Injury Control and Research Centers, and staff in
    injury research agencies around the world. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the
    effect of helmet use in a population of bicyclists who had experienced a crash. We required that
    studies have complete outcome ascertainment, accurate exposure measurement, appropriate selection of
    the comparison group and elimination or control of factors such as selection bias, observation bias
    and confounding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five published studies met the selection criteria.
    Two abstractors using a standard abstraction form independently abstracted data. Odds ratios with
    95% CI were calculated for the protective effect of helmet for head and facial injuries. Study
    results are presented individually. Head and brain injury results were also summarized using
    meta-analysis techniques. MAIN RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials were found. This review
    identified five well conducted case control studies which met our selection criteria. Helmets
    provide a 63%-88% reduction in the risk of head, brain and severe brain injury for all ages of
    bicyclists. Helmets provide equal levels of protection for crashes involving motor vehicles (69%)
    and crashes from all other causes (68%). Injuries to the upper and mid facial areas are reduced 65%.
    REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Helmets reduce bicycle-related head and facial injuries for bicyclists of
    all ages involved in all types of crashes including those involving motor vehicles.

  3. Mike S. asked: << Hey, anyone ever track the severity of crashes that cause helmeted riders going to
    the hospital? <snip.>>

    No, and that is a big problem.. Being in the hospital is the parameter. One person's near-death
    experience is another person's bonk on the head. Do parents rush their kids to the ER after the
    slightest fall off the bike? Do affluent folks, with access to good health care, visit the ER
    more often than poor folks? Do people who buy helmets ride differently than people who don't?
    Lots of unanswered questions...Good guess is that helmets do work to some degree, how much is
    waaay up for debate.

    Robert

  4. Robert "R15757" <[email hidden]> asks: "Do affluent folks, with access to good health care, visit
    the ER more often than poor folks?"

    As an ER doc I can answer this easily without having to do any type of study. The answer is a big
    NO. In fact, just the opposite is the case. Poor people are much more likely to go to the ER than
    affluent people and for more trivial reasons. This does not, of course, change the issue of
    selection bias in helmet studies that Robert raises but it clearly runs in the opposite direction.

    --
    Mike Murray MD

  5. "Mike Murray" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:Vioeb.639153$YN5.488814@sccrnsc01...

    Quoted message said:


    Robert "R15757" <[email hidden]> asks: "Do affluent folks, with access to good health care, visit
    the ER more


    often

    Quoted message said:

    than poor folks?"

    As an ER doc I can answer this easily without having to do any type of study. The answer is a big
    NO. In fact, just the opposite is the case. Poor people are much more likely to go to the ER than
    affluent people and for more trivial reasons. This does not, of course, change the issue of
    selection bias in helmet studies that Robert raises but it clearly runs in the opposite direction.

    --
    Mike Murray MD


    Hey Mr. MD: have you tracked in any way the kinds of injuries that people riding bicycles come in to
    the ER with? I'm interested in what you've seen
    vs. actual statistical analysis.

    Mike

  6. Thomas J. McGuire said:

    Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson R.

    What's our score for this study in this thread? I count three.
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> Distortion Field!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.