"Gooserider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Claire Petersky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Earl Bollinger" wrote: A few months ago, I almost had a head on with a
wrong way Hispanic rider in the wee hours before dawn.(clip)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Earl, why did you feel compelled to mention his ethnicity?
I got called on this sort of thing. I wrote a post on a local board about
some of the people I see commuting the opposite direction to me on their
bikes. Only one person did I describe by race/ethnicity, a black woman.
It caused me to reflect, because one of the cyclists coming the other way
that I didn't describe in those terms was also African American. For him,
though, I didn't think of him as "that black guy" -- his skinniness is
probably more of a physical characteristic, and now that I've chatted
with him once, I think of him as "that racer guy", as I found out he does
bike racing. So why did I think of the woman specifically in terms of
race? I'm not sure. Maybe because I see so few black women cycling?
I don't understand why some people get bent out of shape when
ethnicity/race are used to describe someone. It's no different than
calling someone "the guy with the mohawk" or "the girl with the blonde
hair".
Because it can be different and often is.
I agree with you in principle, people are way too sensitive about it --
actually, sensitive isn't the right word... more like indiscriminate
(pardon the pun) with their offense.
Anytime you stand out in a crowd because of some physically defining
characteristic, you will be referred to by that characteristic in many
situations.
I love to play basketball and in pickup games where nobody knows anyone
else's names, this is principle is abundantly clear. You're not "brink,"
you're "big man." The little point guard type is "little guy." If you're
the only white guy out there, you're "white dude." Etc.
The problem is when mentioning race is tantamount to a code word for a
prejudice about the person being described. I hear it all the time used as
such. I'm also not stupid and I realize that we all have prejudices,
whether racial, or cultural, or material, or bike vs. car... and actually
prejudice *can* be a good thing (gasp!) because the person who goes through
life never picking up on cues about other people around him can end up with
problems that people more attuned to others would easily avoid.
Please understand that when I say "prejudice" I'm not really referring to
race. I'm referring to the dozens of factors about a person we may be able
to assess when we interact with them. As a rider, I will treat very
differently a situation where I must interact with a big truck full of
teenagers than I would a middle-aged woman driving a sedan.
brink