Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

In the News: Planned surtax splits bicycling community

Started by Jason Spaceman · · Last activity · 6 posts · 242 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
28 May 2006
Last activity
29 May 2006
Original author
Jason Spaceman
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
242
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From the article:
    --------------------------------------------------------
    Bike retailers say imports are already heavily taxed

    By Charles Wyatt - Business Edge
    Published: 05/25/2006 - Vol. 3, No. 11

    More than 1.5 million bicycles will be sold in Canada this year and
    $550 million spent on Canada's fourth most popular leisure activity,
    as Canadians in increasing numbers take up biking.

    But the euphoria over the increasing numbers of bike riders remains
    muted as Canadian bike retailers, bike makers, importers and cycling
    associations, await the federal government's decision on whether to
    impose a proposed 30-per-cent surtax on low-cost imported bikes. The
    charge is aimed at protecting Canadian bicycle assemblers from
    low-cost Asian imports.

    The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) recommended last fall
    that the federal government impose a surtax on imported bikes selling
    in Canada for $400 or less. The surtax would be 30 per cent in the
    first year, 25 per cent in the second year and 20 per cent in the
    third year.
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Read it at http://www.businessedge.ca/article.cfm/newsID/12654.cfm

    J. Spaceman

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jason Spaceman said:

    From the article:
    --------------------------------------------------------
    Bike retailers say imports are already heavily taxed

    By Charles Wyatt - Business Edge
    Published: 05/25/2006 - Vol. 3, No. 11

    Quoted message said:

    But the euphoria over the increasing numbers of bike riders remains
    muted as Canadian bike retailers, bike makers, importers and cycling
    associations, await the federal government's decision on whether to
    impose a proposed 30-per-cent surtax on low-cost imported bikes. The
    charge is aimed at protecting Canadian bicycle assemblers from
    low-cost Asian imports.

    The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) recommended last fall
    that the federal government impose a surtax on imported bikes selling
    in Canada for $400 or less. The surtax would be 30 per cent in the
    first year, 25 per cent in the second year and 20 per cent in the
    third year.

    What the article doesn't say is that the split is basically between
    Procycle (most famous for their Rocky Mountain brand, but also the owner
    of several other Canadian bike brands) and everyone else in the country.

    It's a BS duty that Procycle wants so it has a chance of competing in
    the low end of the bicycle market. But with the bar set at $400, it
    affects some bike-shop-grade bikes. Entry level, to be sure, but real
    bikes usable every day.

    I tend to take umbrage at the idea that I need to be protected from
    Taiwan's manufacturing capability.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  3. Tarriffs screw the consumer, plain and simple. They force buyers to
    overpay local manufacturers for being less efficient.

    Jason Spaceman said:

    From the article:
    --------------------------------------------------------
    Bike retailers say imports are already heavily taxed

    By Charles Wyatt - Business Edge
    Published: 05/25/2006 - Vol. 3, No. 11

    More than 1.5 million bicycles will be sold in Canada this year and
    $550 million spent on Canada's fourth most popular leisure activity,
    as Canadians in increasing numbers take up biking.

    But the euphoria over the increasing numbers of bike riders remains
    muted as Canadian bike retailers, bike makers, importers and cycling
    associations, await the federal government's decision on whether to
    impose a proposed 30-per-cent surtax on low-cost imported bikes. The
    charge is aimed at protecting Canadian bicycle assemblers from
    low-cost Asian imports.

    The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) recommended last fall
    that the federal government impose a surtax on imported bikes selling
    in Canada for $400 or less. The surtax would be 30 per cent in the
    first year, 25 per cent in the second year and 20 per cent in the
    third year.
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Read it at http://www.businessedge.ca/article.cfm/newsID/12654.cfm

    J. Spaceman

  4. MyakkaMike <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Tarriffs screw the consumer, plain and simple. They force buyers to
    overpay local manufacturers for being less efficient.

    In overall costs to society, I believe the figures show that in the general
    history of this kind of protectionism the 'tax' paid by the consumers to
    save the 'endangered' industries far and away surpass any loss of revenue,
    tax or otherwise, from closure of the ineffiecient employers.

    I believe the history is also that the products so protected end up in a
    spiral of 'why improve the breed when we got the government protecting us'.

    Even the Labour party in the UK let Rover die... after paying the
    employees off until after the election.

  5. Ryan Cousineau says...

    Quoted message said:

    I tend to take umbrage at the idea that I need to be protected from
    Taiwan's manufacturing capability.

    China, not Taiwan.

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Barnard Frederick said:

    Ryan Cousineau says...

    Quoted message said:

    I tend to take umbrage at the idea that I need to be protected from
    Taiwan's manufacturing capability.

    China, not Taiwan.

    Fair enough. Taiwan probably still sells some bikes into this cheap end
    of the market, but China is the main source.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.