General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Reminder: Texas Ranch House

Started by jmcquown · · Last activity · 45 posts · 543 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 May 2006
Last activity
4 May 2006
Original author
jmcquown
Posts
45
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
543
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 45
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.

    Jill

  2. "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas.
    The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.

    Jill

    Here is a cornmeal griddle cake pic(s) I took last week Yorktown, VA
    (representative 1781).
    http://tinypic.com/x0pj0m.jpg

    http://tinypic.com/x0pjwm.jpg - the cast iron lid is flat with coals on it;
    the pie is blueberry

    http://tinypic.com/x0pm4p.jpg - She said the liquid on the bottom was honey.

    This last picture is a round circle with 8 dugouts. Each dugout has a cook,
    and the men stand in line behind each dugout while the cook serves. You can
    see one pot cooking. http://tinypic.com/x0pnnn.jpg
    But most of the pots that were cooked in at locations such as this were mere
    large tin cans.
    Dee Dee

  3. On Mon, 1 May 2006 17:10:28 -0500, "jmcquown" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.

    I love all the "house" shows. It's so interesting to learn and think
    about the minutae of day to day life in historical times. I've been
    obsessed with the Little House on the Prairie book series since I was
    five years old. We learn all about the big, historical events and
    famous characters, but I am so much more fascinated by everyday life,
    which of course did influence the history makers and culture.

    Tara

  4. Tara said:

    On Mon, 1 May 2006 17:10:28 -0500, "jmcquown" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting,
    this time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to
    1867 Texas. The series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four
    nights. I'm betting someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe
    some cornmeal griddle cakes (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake
    biscuits over an open fire or bake some soda bread.

    I love all the "house" shows. It's so interesting to learn and think
    about the minutae of day to day life in historical times. I've been
    obsessed with the Little House on the Prairie book series since I was
    five years old.

    The funny thing about 'The Frontier House' was that the teenagers said
    specifically it wasn't "Little House on the Prairie". They didn't get to
    wash their hair every day and they didn't have time to braid their hair.
    Factually, if you braided your hair you kept it braided for about a week and
    when you took it down to finally wash it in the creek, it was funky and
    gunky. Homemade shampoo made with a little soaproot and some sweet smelling
    herbs. Nice, but only once a week, if that 🙂

    Jill

  5. jmcquown said:

    The funny thing about 'The Frontier House' was that the teenagers said
    specifically it wasn't "Little House on the Prairie". They didn't get to
    wash their hair every day and they didn't have time to braid their hair.

    Most telling was at the end when the well off family went back to
    their old lives and moved into their brand new mansion. Dad fell back
    into his old routine of jet-setting around the world to make the big
    bucks, the whole thing barely a blip on his radar. Mom was ecstatic
    and locked herself into the laundry room to make love to her
    washer/dryer, hysterically shrieking, "I'll cut the first person who
    touches my appliances". But the real surprise was the kids who went
    into a state of numb shock, finally realizing now that hanging out and
    cruising the mall are a pointless bore. That was the best part of the
    whole series.

    All the rest of those copycat programs were dull and boring. The only
    good thing I heard was the comedy bit Kathy Griffith did about 1600
    House (something like that) w/ Oprah. She joked about how Oprah
    wandered about the set grousing, "I ain't gonna BE no slave." The
    upshot was when everything was all set and everyone was on their mark
    and they started filming and when Oprah came out, all the period
    dressed women began screaming, "OPRAH!!".

    nb

  6. jmcquown said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.


    I probably missed it, but what time is it supposed to be on?
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

  7. "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas.
    The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.

    Jill

    Thanks for the reminder!!

    Personally I think that "chef" needs to go. He might be a chef but he
    doesn't seem to be able to handle the conditions he's dealing with. He gave
    those poor ranch hands food poisoning!

    Ms P

  8. ms_peacock said:

    "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting,
    this time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to
    1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm
    betting someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal
    griddle cakes (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over
    an open fire or bake some soda bread.

    Jill

    Thanks for the reminder!!

    Personally I think that "chef" needs to go. He might be a chef but he
    doesn't seem to be able to handle the conditions he's dealing with.
    He gave those poor ranch hands food poisoning!

    Ms P

    I was seriously disappointed in this, the beginning episode. Unlike
    Frontier House (and I somehow missed the Colonial House series), they didn't
    show how they were preparing people to live in 1867. They just sort of
    plopped these people down and said go for it. Was rather boring, if you ask
    me. Not at all like Frontier House where they actually taught them some
    skills like how to cook over a wood fire, how to raise and butcher some
    animals. Yes, ladies, you wore corsets. And chemises and petticoats. But
    no, after the Civil War hoops weren't required but they did help with the
    "air conditioning" factor under those volumnous skirts.

    Jill

  9. notbob said:
    jmcquown said:

    The funny thing about 'The Frontier House' was that the teenagers
    said specifically it wasn't "Little House on the Prairie". They
    didn't get to wash their hair every day and they didn't have time to
    braid their hair.

    Most telling was at the end when the well off family went back to
    their old lives and moved into their brand new mansion. Dad fell back
    into his old routine of jet-setting around the world to make the big
    bucks, the whole thing barely a blip on his radar. Mom was ecstatic
    and locked herself into the laundry room to make love to her
    washer/dryer, hysterically shrieking, "I'll cut the first person who
    touches my appliances". But the real surprise was the kids who went
    into a state of numb shock, finally realizing now that hanging out and
    cruising the mall are a pointless bore. That was the best part of the
    whole series.

    All the rest of those copycat programs were dull and boring. The only
    good thing I heard was the comedy bit Kathy Griffith did about 1600
    House (something like that) w/ Oprah. She joked about how Oprah
    wandered about the set grousing, "I ain't gonna BE no slave." The
    upshot was when everything was all set and everyone was on their mark
    and they started filming and when Oprah came out, all the period
    dressed women began screaming, "OPRAH!!".

    nb

  10. notbob said:
    jmcquown said:

    The funny thing about 'The Frontier House' was that the teenagers
    said specifically it wasn't "Little House on the Prairie". They
    didn't get to wash their hair every day and they didn't have time to
    braid their hair.

    Most telling was at the end when the well off family went back to
    their old lives and moved into their brand new mansion. Dad fell back
    into his old routine of jet-setting around the world

    But he *did* actually start a lawn mower and mow the lawn. (laughing)

    to make the big

    Quoted message said:

    bucks, the whole thing barely a blip on his radar.

    Yet he claimed they could have "made it"! They were the ones who cheated
    the whole time. They went outside the community to buy goods from the
    nearest town. They were caught with a box spring mattress under their bed.
    They couldn't figure out how to stretch some canned good and didn't bother
    to build a corral for their cow and calf. Hello?

    Mom was ecstatic

    Quoted message said:

    and locked herself into the laundry room to make love to her
    washer/dryer, hysterically shrieking, "I'll cut the first person who
    touches my appliances".

    She also [censored] about a dog eating her some of her biscuits. Oh dear.
    Well, that's just too bad. It's not like it takes all day to make a pan of
    biscuits. Unless you're used to just going out to lunch with your
    girlfriends in Malibu.

    But the real surprise was the kids who went

    Quoted message said:

    into a state of numb shock, finally realizing now that hanging out and
    cruising the mall are a pointless bore. That was the best part of the
    whole series.


    Yes! That was funny! Oh but of course they all had to try to smuggle in
    makeup. Vanity, thy name is a Southern California Teenager 🙂

    Jill

  11. jmcquown said:

    Yet he claimed they could have "made it"! They were the ones who cheated
    the whole time. They went outside the community to buy goods from the
    nearest town.

    Was that the well-off family? I forgot.

    I did see Texas House, last night. The informational narration was
    quite interesting, revealing historical facts I was unaware of. But,
    many of the people playing the parts were just annoying. The Colonel
    wasn't the only one that should've been sacked. I now suspect the
    people in charge of these programs purposely populate them with a few
    spoiled snivelers to give voice to just how really hard life was in
    those times. Wouldn't be nearly as entertaining if everyone took
    their part seriously and did what they were supposed to without hassle
    or complaint. OTOH, some of these people were just too much. The
    hired hands acted like they were suffering the fires of Hell. Cripes,
    weren't any of these guys ever Boy Scouts? Maybe not. Even camping
    out isn't what it used to be.

    If they are going to continue on in this vein, I, for one, would like
    to see one of these past reality shows reveal the life of a mariner,
    ala Two Years Before the Mast or being in the Royal Navy circa 1805.

    nb

    nb

  12. notbob said:
    jmcquown said:

    Yet he claimed they could have "made it"! They were the ones who
    cheated the whole time. They went outside the community to buy
    goods from the nearest town.

    Was that the well-off family? I forgot.


    Yeah they were the ones with a mansion in Malibu.

    Quoted message said:

    I did see Texas House, last night. The informational narration was
    quite interesting, revealing historical facts I was unaware of. But,
    many of the people playing the parts were just annoying. The Colonel
    wasn't the only one that should've been sacked. I now suspect the
    people in charge of these programs purposely populate them with a few
    spoiled snivelers to give voice to just how really hard life was in
    those times. Wouldn't be nearly as entertaining if everyone took
    their part seriously and did what they were supposed to without hassle
    or complaint. OTOH, some of these people were just too much. The
    hired hands acted like they were suffering the fires of Hell. Cripes,
    weren't any of these guys ever Boy Scouts? Maybe not. Even camping
    out isn't what it used to be.


    Hey, I've dug a latrine. I've lived without electricity for a week (but
    can't say how I'd live without ice for 6 months)

    Quoted message said:

    If they are going to continue on in this vein, I, for one, would like
    to see one of these past reality shows reveal the life of a mariner,
    ala Two Years Before the Mast or being in the Royal Navy circa 1805.

    nb


    How about life amongst the folks in travelling to the U.S. (excepting 1912
    Titanic, because of course we don't want the ship to sink) on big wooden
    ships, crossing the North Atlantic. My great great great grandfather and
    his son came here in 1680 from Scotland and landed at Amboy, NJ (now known
    as Perth Amboy). The voyage took about 3 months. They were sent over as
    indentured servants bound for Virginia.

    Jill

  13. sf said:
    jmcquown said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.


    I probably missed it, but what time is it supposed to be on?
    --

    It's on 8-10, EDT, 4 consecutive nights this week - Monday through
    Thursday, on PBS.

    N.

  14. notbob said:
    jmcquown said:

    Yet he claimed they could have "made it"! They were the ones who cheated
    the whole time. They went outside the community to buy goods from the
    nearest town.

    Was that the well-off family? I forgot.

    I did see Texas House, last night. The informational narration was
    quite interesting, revealing historical facts I was unaware of. But,
    many of the people playing the parts were just annoying. The Colonel
    wasn't the only one that should've been sacked. I now suspect the
    people in charge of these programs purposely populate them with a few
    spoiled snivelers to give voice to just how really hard life was in
    those times. Wouldn't be nearly as entertaining if everyone took
    their part seriously and did what they were supposed to without hassle
    or complaint. OTOH, some of these people were just too much. The
    hired hands acted like they were suffering the fires of Hell. Cripes,
    weren't any of these guys ever Boy Scouts? Maybe not. Even camping
    out isn't what it used to be.


    You are not wrong. I read an interview with the producers of the UK
    version of these shows, and they admitted that it was all in the
    casting. Really helps if you can find a few square pegs for the round
    holes you're filling. I watched a few episodes of The 1940's House,
    which was supposedly set during WWII. Of course they were on rations.

    Cooking on rations was a challenge, but millions managed it. However,
    the lady of the house was someone who couldn't boil an egg, all her real
    life cooking was heating frozen food up in the microwave. They made her
    try making pastry, which resulted in much angst and the waste of
    precious rationed food. They had rabbits but were too squeamish to eat
    them, of course.

    I am not a great fan of this genre. They don't really tell you much
    about life in the past, which is indeed another country. What they tell
    you about is life now, and what people are used to and expect (and how
    ignorant they are about the past). After a while this gets boring, so
    the producers set up situations to provide a bit of colour and movement
    because even in the past life was mostly routine. And of course if
    anybody breaks a leg they call an ambulance

    Quoted message said:

    If they are going to continue on in this vein, I, for one, would like
    to see one of these past reality shows reveal the life of a mariner,
    ala Two Years Before the Mast or being in the Royal Navy circa 1805.

    nb


    You wouldn't be a Patrick O'Bryan fan by any chance?

    Christine

  15. Old Mother Ashby said:

    You are not wrong. I read an interview with the producers of the UK
    version of these shows, and they admitted that it was all in the
    casting. Really helps if you can find a few square pegs for the round
    holes you're filling. I watched a few episodes of The 1940's House,
    which was supposedly set during WWII. Of course they were on rations.

    Cooking on rations was a challenge, but millions managed it. However,
    the lady of the house was someone who couldn't boil an egg, all her real
    life cooking was heating frozen food up in the microwave. They made her
    try making pastry, which resulted in much angst and the waste of
    precious rationed food. They had rabbits but were too squeamish to eat
    them, of course.

    You might have missed the part where in her contemporary life she is a
    vegetarian and never cooks meat. The kids eat meat outside of the home.
    That is why the rabbits held no attraction for her.

  16. sf said:
    jmcquown said:

    One wonders if they will cook chili. Or beans. Or beans in chili.

    The next in the the 'house' series produced by Public Broadcasting, this
    time they drop a few families down in conditions similar to 1867 Texas. The
    series starts tonight on PBS and for the next four nights. I'm betting
    someone bakes cornbread in cast iron. Maybe some cornmeal griddle cakes
    (love those!). Maybe they'll even bake biscuits over an open fire or bake
    some soda bread.


    I probably missed it, but what time is it supposed to be on?
    --

    Ham and eggs.
    A day's work for a chicken, a lifetime commitment for a pig.

    PBS is running two hour-long episodes an evening (MTWTh) this week.
    Check your local listings, but here in Eugene it's at 9 & 10PM.

    I've been looking forward to this one since I actually know the Cooke
    family. Lisa is a very serious history buff who enjoys a challenge &
    was in 7th heaven taking that walk back in time with her family.
    Although last night's episodes didn't really cover it, the family - as
    well as the ranch hands - was given extensive coaching (including some
    serious riding lessons) before they ever left CA.

    When I spoke with her a couple of months ago, the participants hadn't
    been given an opportunity to view the final product & she was really
    hoping that the positive aspects of their experiences would be
    reflected by the program's editors. She found it amusing, if not a bit
    disappointing, that the production staff actively encouraged
    "fireworks" between participants ("you won't believe what I heard
    (blank) say about you"😉 and related that she and "the girl of all work"
    had frustrated the efforts to start "trouble" between them from the
    very beginning of their stay. Makes me wonder what was really behind
    last night's drama between the foreman and the cook.

    At any rate, the film crew started spending a lot more time off with
    the cowboys when it became clear there wasn't going to be any hair
    pulling back on the ranch, frequently leaving the women all alone
    during the day. Lisa shared that that was one of her favorite parts of
    the experience...no film crew, just the women working together,
    enjoying the quiet beauty of the ranch and one another's companionship.

    As part of their "role playing" am sure the Cookes were directed to
    maintain a social distance from the ranch hands & I have to disagree
    with the poster who thought they'd all have eaten together. 19th
    Century society had such well defined class structures and it would
    have been highly unusual for an affluent San Francisco family new to
    ranching (with 3 daughters) to encourage a bunch of smelly, rough
    around the edges, cowhands to interact with them on a personal level.
    This ranch owner has provided a separate living facility and a separate
    cook for the hands, so it's clearly the cook's job to feed them, not
    the ranch owner's wife.

    Truth is, 19th century cowboys often didn't eat very well - it went
    with the territory. They called it "grub" for a reason and it was
    basic sustanance, not cuisine. These guys were lucky to have actually
    had a cook - many pretty much fended for themselves. The rancher's
    family, with their higher social status, would have had more refined
    tastes and would definitely have eaten better and more varied foods. It
    would've been accepted as perfectly normal for all involved. On the
    other hand, I think any good on-site ranch cook would've maintained his
    own kitchen garden with some basics like onions, carrots & potatoes...
    & have a sinking feeling the producers sort of set this guy up to fail
    & cast him accordingly.

    Regardless of how they're portrayed in the Texas Ranch, the real
    Cooke's are a terrific family - compassionate, intelligent, generous,
    and thoughtful people. Lisa knows her way around a garden, a kitchen &
    a chicken coop and isn't afraid of hard work. She's one heck of a cook
    and a baker who makes amazing pies and decorates cakes like a pro...and
    she loves to feed people. If feeding the ranch hands had been part of
    her duties, she'd have been right in there.

    What I do find a little odd is that none of those whiney cowboys has
    suggested wacking a cow and dragging it home for BBQ! Maybe tonight.

    Nancy T

  17. Goomba38 said:
    Old Mother Ashby said:

    You are not wrong. I read an interview with the producers of the UK
    version of these shows, and they admitted that it was all in the
    casting. Really helps if you can find a few square pegs for the round
    holes you're filling. I watched a few episodes of The 1940's House,
    which was supposedly set during WWII. Of course they were on rations.

    Cooking on rations was a challenge, but millions managed it. However,
    the lady of the house was someone who couldn't boil an egg, all her
    real life cooking was heating frozen food up in the microwave. They
    made her try making pastry, which resulted in much angst and the
    waste of precious rationed food. They had rabbits but were too
    squeamish to eat them, of course.

    You might have missed the part where in her contemporary life she is a
    vegetarian and never cooks meat. The kids eat meat outside of the
    home. That is why the rabbits held no attraction for her.

    This just goes to show where they go for casting rather than who would have
    been living in Texas (or wherever) at the time.

  18. Old Mother Ashby said:

    You wouldn't be a Patrick O'Bryan fan by any chance?

    Busted! 🙂

    I'm on my second time through. Plus, several derivative works like a
    series dictionary and cookbook. I recently found an article in the SF
    Chron revealing that, for all his detail and historical accuracy,
    O'Brian couldn't sail a boat for spit. Hadn't a clue. Also, after
    reading the Aubrey/Maturin series the first time, I began reading the
    Hornblower series. It became quickly apparent O'Brian wasn't above
    lifting more than a few ideas from others. O'Brian's gift was in
    recreating the accurate atmosphere of the period and his dry sense of
    humor. One would have to be "a whey-faced nestlecock" to not enjoy
    his writings.

    nb

    nb

  19. notbob said:
    Old Mother Ashby said:

    You wouldn't be a Patrick O'Bryan fan by any chance?

    Busted! 🙂

    I'm on my second time through. Plus, several derivative works like a
    series dictionary and cookbook. I recently found an article in the SF
    Chron revealing that, for all his detail and historical accuracy,
    O'Brian couldn't sail a boat for spit. Hadn't a clue. Also, after
    reading the Aubrey/Maturin series the first time, I began reading the
    Hornblower series. It became quickly apparent O'Brian wasn't above
    lifting more than a few ideas from others. O'Brian's gift was in
    recreating the accurate atmosphere of the period and his dry sense of
    humor. One would have to be "a whey-faced nestlecock" to not enjoy
    his writings.

    nb


    Derrick's just finished his second read. Have you read the biography?
    Not only could he not sail, he had a murky past, not a nice man at all.
    The whole "Patrick O'Bryan" persona was a fiction which he perpetrated
    most of his life.

    Nevertheless, I think his books are much more than genre stories like
    the Hornblower books. They are (with the exception of the last few where
    he was getting a bit desperate) first class historical novels, great
    writing by any standards.

    What did you think of the film? I am usually disappointed with movie
    adaptations of novels, but I thought it worked wonderfully, even though
    the actor playing Maturin was too young and too big.

    The cook book is a must have. I have toyed with the idea of a birthday
    do for Derrick with food from the book (and music from the CD which we
    have). I don't know that I could manage it myself; in my wildest
    fantasies I approach a little local restaurant (run by a trio of
    enthusiastic young women) and let them loose on the menu. It'll probably
    never happen...

    Christine

  20. Old Mother Ashby said:

    Derrick's just finished his second read. Have you read the biography?

    I'm halfway through the second read. Haven't read the bio, yet.

    Quoted message said:

    The whole "Patrick O'Bryan"....

    You seem well versed on ol' Pat. So, why the "O'Bryon" spelling?
    Another ruse?

    Quoted message said:

    he was getting a bit desperate) first class historical novels, great
    writing by any standards.

    Agreed. I love his use of the period vernacular. Who knew that men
    once used "dear" to address each other. It's takes two readings to
    enjoy the stories. The first read is just a primer to the language.

    Quoted message said:

    What did you think of the film?

    I enjoyed it, but didn't see it till long after I read that particular
    book in the series. Now that I've just recently finished Far Side of the
    World, I'm somewhat disappointed. Except for lifting an episode here
    and there, the movie has little to do with the book of the same title, or
    any other of the series, for that matter. You'd think with twenty
    books, they wouldn't need to write their own fiction for the film.
    OTOH, the film did capture the atmosphere of the books. I've never
    seen another film portray life aboard a sailing ship so well.

    Quoted message said:

    The cook book is a must have.

    I have it but really have no desire to use it. I had no idea how much
    slush (beef fat) was in their diet. The book should've been titled
    Grease Floats. 😉

    nb

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.