William H. O'Hara said:Good morning,
I have not maded it to Sheldon Brown's shop, yet. I've looked at TREK & CANNONDALE over and over
at two stores that I had not visited prior to my first post. I love how several of the LBS act
like used car lots and sell on commission. Their prices approach used cars.
I test rode a R600 from Cannondale's '02 line.
I could never balance the bike with out placing my hands on the bar while pedaling or freewheel.
My old touring bike I could roll out of the driveway and turn direction without touching the bars.
Can the lack of balance be correct? The bike in general rocked left and right. I tried a 58 and 60
with similar results. My schwinn does not track like this at all.
Racing bikes are generally more flippy than tourers and will be harder to ride no hands. But in my
experience every bike rides slightly differently and you will find any bike you are used to easier
to ride no hands than any bike you are not used to, pretty much regardless of the inherent stability
of the bike.
The R600 is almost certainly inherently less stable than a typical tourer. The angles are _very_
short. This makes for a responsive bike that is fun to ride, but the consequence is it is very much
more sensitive to balance. If you get used to it you'll be able to ride no hands without problem.
I don't know what your Schwinn is like - in Europe they have a reputation for being rather cheap and
nasty, but this may be because the good ones aren't aren't imported here - but unless it is a
specialist road-racing bike it is almost certain to be more directionally stable than a CAAD5.
The Cannondale is a beautiful bike and will be a complete blast to ride fast. But it isn't a tourer
and if what you want to do is pootle down lanes and admire the scenery it may not be the right bike
for you. If you were looking for a faster, more responsive bike than your Scwinn, you've got it, and
that's what you're feeling.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simonOpen ↗
Anagram: I'm soon broke.