General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Fraud by Heimlich Alleged

Started by Tom Kennedy · · Last activity · 2 posts · 877 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 September 2003
Last activity
16 September 2003
Original author
Tom Kennedy
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
877
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The following was posted on the USLA bulletin board, 9-8-03:

    Information has been published on a website alleging fraud on the part of Dr. Henry Heimlich with
    respect to his promotion of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning. The website can be found at:

    medfraud.fateback.comIOM AHA ARC Letter Intro.html

    Part of the site involves detailed allegations with respect to Ellis and Associates' decision to
    train its lifeguards in use of the Heimlich maneuver for drowning and to subsequently terminate
    that training:

    medfraud.fateback.comIOM AHA ARC Ellis.html

    According to information provided to USLA, the complaint "has been addressed to the presidents of
    these national organizations which appear to have been defrauded:

    - The National Academy of Sciences
    - The Institute of Medicine
    - The American Heart Association
    - The American Red Cross"

    Neither USLA nor the International Life Saving Federation recommend use of the Heimlich maneuver for
    drowning resusciation, except in special and very limited circumstances. Please see Open Water
    Lifesaving -- The United States Lifesaving Manual for further details.

  2. Posted in January 2000 on the Corporate site for American Red Cross:

    AMERICAN RED CROSS

    ADVISORY COUNCIL ON FIRST AID AND SAFETY

    Use of the Heimlich Maneuver First in Near-drowning Victims (See Disclaimer)

    Question: After removing a victim of near-drowning from the water, what is the first step a rescuer
    should be trained to do?

    Overview: The American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
    and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC) state that if a victim is not breathing, the rescuer should
    initiate CPR immediately. If the ventilation efforts do not make the victim's chest rise, the
    rescuer should attempt to clear the airway by using age-appropriate methods for relief of foreign
    body airway obstruction. These AHA CPR/ECC guidelines are supported by the American Academy of
    Pediatrics, the American College of Cardiology, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the
    Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Despite consensus on these guidelines, Henry J. Heimlich MD, who developed the maneuver to relieve
    choking victims, contends that in cases of near-drowning the Heimlich maneuver should be the first
    procedure attempted, before CPR. Dr. Heimlich contends that water gets into and obstructs the airway
    of near-drowning victims and that his maneuver will relieve this obstruction.

    Review Process: The titles and abstracts of 117 citations were retrieved using a computerized search
    of the National Library of Medicine Medline database from 1966 to 1999. MeSH heading combinations of
    "drowning" or "near-drowning" with "Heimlich maneuver" were used as search parameters. The abstracts
    of all citations were reviewed and those that appeared to be appropriate were selected for review of
    the complete reference. Manual search of the reference lists from these articles was also conducted
    for additional citations that might be relevant. This process resulted in the review of 27 citations
    of which 18 (all class III) were found to discuss the role of the Heimlich maneuver in
    near-drowning.

    Scientific Foundation: Heimlich states that near-drowning victims aspirate large amounts of water
    and that the water causes obstruction of the airway. He advocates that the safest and most
    effective method for removing water from the lungs of a near-drowning victim is the
    subdiaphragmatic abdominal thrust (Heimlich maneuver). He states that this maneuver should be the
    first step in the management of the near-drowning patient and should be repeated until no water or
    fluid flows from the patient's mouth. In order to minimize the risk of aspiration (which he
    believes to be low since the patient is not breathing and will not inhale any vomitus), the head of
    the patient should be turned to one side or on a sloping shore the patient can be placed in a head
    down position. Heimlich cites several anecdotal case reports, including one involving an aspirated
    piece of vegetable, to support his opinion.,

    There is no scientific literature available supporting the concepts that near-drowning victims
    aspirate large volumes of water, that aspirated water obstructs the airway of near-drowning
    victims, that the water must be removed immediately upon rescue of the patient, or that the
    Heimlich maneuver (abdominal thrust) is an effective and safe method for removing aspirated water
    from the airway and lungs.

    Modell in a review article reported that 15% of near-drowning patients have no evidence of any water
    aspiration. The remaining 85% do aspirate some water, up to 22 milliliters per kilogram of body
    weight, although he stresses that in many cases the amount is much less than the 22
    ml/kg. He points out that one would expect electrolyte abnormalities in patients who have aspirated
    large amounts of water. In actuality, these changes are rarely found, thus suggesting that
    aspiration of large amounts of water does not occur. Modell recommends immediate airway control
    and initiation of ventilation and correction of hypoxemia. Simcock also reported that many
    patients of near-drowning did not have any signs of aspiration of water, including some who
    appeared apneic when removed from the water.

    Rosen, chairing an expert committee for the Institute of Medicine (IOM), could find no evidence that
    water aspiration in fact causes obstruction or prevents efforts to ventilate patients. The IOM panel
    recommended that the current ECC guideline of establishing an airway and ventilation be the
    priority. Quan, in a study of submersion victims, reported no finding of airway fluid to impair
    paramedics' ability to intubate nor any difficulty in ventilating patients once intubated.,

    The sequence of events which occurs following water aspiration into the lungs includes laryngospasm,
    fluid shifts across the pulmonary alveolar membrane, destruction of surfactant, atalectasis,
    intrapulmonary shunting, and pulmonary edema formation. Weinstein et al point out the final
    pathophysiologic result of near drowning is hypoxemia. As was stated in the IOM report 8, there is
    no evidence in any study that removing water from the lungs will alter this sequence of events.

    Numerous other authorities have also recommended that obtaining an airway, ventilating the patient
    and correcting hypoxemia are the immediate treatment priorities.11,12,13,14,15

    Weinstein et al point out that no study has demonstrated that the Heimlich maneuver can result in
    the removal of significant amounts of fluids from the lungs of these patients.11 He also raises the
    concern that an abdominal thrust may cause vomiting. This could interfere with efforts to ventilate
    the patient or may result in aspiration and further deterioration of the pulmonary status. Others
    have also echoed the concerns about inducing regurgitation or vomiting.13 Finally Weinstein also
    voices the concern that efforts to perform the Heimlich maneuver delay the establishment of an
    airway, ventilation and correction of hypoxemia.

    The recommendation by Heimlich that the victim's head be turned to the side to facilitate drainage
    of fluid expelled as a result of performing the Heimlich maneuver has also raised concerns about the
    potential for exacerbation of a possible cervical spine injury in some patients.8

    Summary: The available scientific evidence supports the position that victims of near-drowning
    should first have a patent airway secured, ventilation initiated, and hypoxemia corrected. If
    efforts to ventilate the patient suggest obstruction of the airway, the Heimlich maneuver may be
    performed in an attempt to clear the obstruction.

    Recommendation Strength:

    Standards: There is no evidence to support a treatment standard.

    Guidelines: There is no evidence to support a treatment guideline.

    Options: The first step after removing a victim of near-drowning from the water should be to obtain
    an airway, initiate ventilation and correct hypoxemia. If the patient cannot be ventilated,
    suggesting a tracheal obstruction, the Heimlich maneuver may be performed to attempt to clear the
    obstruction.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.