Home General fitness, health and nutrition Food For Thought---Radcliffe's Marathon WR
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section General fitness, health and nutrition
Published 16 September 2003
Last activity 16 September 2003
Original author Josef Stalin
Posts 6
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 475
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–6 of 6 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Josef Stalin
Archived post
16 September 2003, 05:41 UTC
#1
Conversion formulas vary, as do runners, but some of them put Radcliffe's 2:15:25 as = to a sub 29 minute 10,000 meters (well below the Chinese WR) and a sub 14 minute 5000...
Taking a similar runner or two (no kick, great endurance) like Salazar (@27.5 & @2 :08) or Bill Rogers (@28 & @ 2:09.5) yields a low 29...
Hmmmmmm.
Hmmm...
16 September 2003, 05:42 UTC
#2
Josef Stalin wrote in message <[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said: Conversion formulas vary, as do runners, but some of them put Radcliffe's 2:15:25 as = to a sub 29 minute 10,000 meters (well below the Chinese WR)
and a
Quoted message said: sub 14 minute 5000...
Taking a similar runner or two (no kick, great endurance) like Salazar
(@27.5 &
Quoted message said: @2 :08) or Bill Rogers (@28 & @ 2:09.5) yields a low 29...
Hmmmmmm.
Women have better endurance. They have outdone guys in a few ultras.
16 September 2003, 05:43 UTC
#3
Roger 2k said: Women have better endurance. They have outdone guys in a few ultras.
They can outdo us is many, many areas. Just recall the last time you were in a sweaty fetal position thinking how great a lover you were and she whispers, "Can we do that again, now?" 🙂
-- Caveat Lector "the further you go outside, the further you go inside" - B. McKibben Doug Freese [email hidden]
Steve Common
Archived post
16 September 2003, 07:11 UTC
#4
Doug Freese said: They can outdo us is many, many areas.
Last year's Badwater outright winner was a lady, if I remember right.
Quoted message said: Just recall the last time you were in a sweaty fetal position thinking how great a lover you were and she whispers, "Can we do that again, now?" 🙂
You're not on Zoloft, are you ;-
Nina Stoessinge
Archived post
16 September 2003, 08:15 UTC
#5
Roger 2k said: Women have better endurance. They have outdone guys in a few ultras.
right - wasn't it a female who won the last badwater?
nina
16 September 2003, 09:13 UTC
#6
nina stoessinger said: Roger 2k said: Women have better endurance. They have outdone guys in a few ultras.
right - wasn't it a female who won the last badwater?
Pam Reed in 27:56:47. The nearest tallywhacker was in 32:38:57. Pam showered and [censored] before the the first dude.
-- Caveat Lector "the further you go outside, the further you go inside" - B. McKibben Doug Freese [email hidden]
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.