Re: Question fo Mu and Dr. Chung

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:01:48 GMT, "BJ Nelson" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Thank you for the link. This time when I tried it, it actually opened a web
site (my comp problem I believe). However, I have yet to read a post from
you giving a thoughtful comment about why you believe in the diet and saying
something to the effect - for more information go here - with you link.

Google me. I have a history of posting such things you look for.

Quoted message said:

I assume you are on the diet?

Yes.

Quoted message said:

And have had success?

Yes.

Quoted message said:

Perhaps you once
posted about that but all I've seen has been name calling and squabbling.

See above.

Quoted message said:

My purpose is/was not to attack you or Dr. Chung. I know neither of you and
know little about the diet you support.

You will know all you need via Google and the above link.

Quoted message said:

My point was that if you want to
enlighten people like me - you might have better luck with intelligent,
thoughtful posts that provide information in addition to giving the link to
go to for additional info - instead of posts full of bickering and name
calling - which may happen to have a link at the end of it.

Or one might say that if you don't shake the nest, the hornets may
never fly.

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

*Mu* <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:00:35 GMT, "BJ Nelson" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

The impression I have is that neither of you support a low carb way of
eating.

I support a lowered food intake and don't particularly care, when
speaking of weight loss only, how you go about eating less.

Now, nutritionally, we have a different issue if sat fats, as proposed
by Atkins for instance, is in the discussion.

Quoted message said:

That being the case I have to wonder why you even post here - since
this group is for the SUPPORT of low carb eating. I'm assuming you post
here to promote the 2 pound diet way of eating - ? If this is the case -
you're failing miserably

Thank you for the advertising then.

lol

Quoted message said:

2 - I have not yet seen a single post by either of you which actually GIVES
any information about the 2 pound diet way of eating.

Are you blind or daft or both?

The gutless coward insults again...

Quoted message said:

Ok, for you. One more time.

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Quoted message said:

3 - If I had been interested in learning about such a diet - such posts
would not provide me with any confidence in your credibility.

Since you haven't read the website, you're sincerity in being educated
prior to starting this thread is, shall we say, suspect?

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

Quoted message said:

Or one might say that if you don't shake the nest, the hornets may
never fly.

I shake it more than twice - because I'm playing with it. I love double
entendre, don't you, [censored]? -- Scott

Well, did you get your answer BJ?

BTW, I completely agree with what you stated, as does just about
everyone else here. I also asked why a legitimate doctor would be
continually posting sophomoric messages in a support group for LC.

These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent on causing as much
disruption as possible with their one line posts. It's best to just
ignore them. They have no respect for the newsgroup charter or any of
the people here who make the newsgroup useful.

*Mu* <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:00:35 GMT, "BJ Nelson" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

The impression I have is that neither of you support a low carb way of
eating.

I support a lowered food intake and don't particularly care, when
speaking of weight loss only, how you go about eating less.

Now, nutritionally, we have a different issue if sat fats, as proposed
by Atkins for instance, is in the discussion.

Quoted message said:

That being the case I have to wonder why you even post here - since
this group is for the SUPPORT of low carb eating. I'm assuming you post
here to promote the 2 pound diet way of eating - ? If this is the case -
you're failing miserably

Thank you for the advertising then.

lol

Quoted message said:

2 - I have not yet seen a single post by either of you which actually GIVES
any information about the 2 pound diet way of eating.

Are you blind or daft or both?

Ok, for you. One more time.

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Quoted message said:

3 - If I had been interested in learning about such a diet - such posts
would not provide me with any confidence in your credibility.

Since you haven't read the website, you're sincerity in being educated
prior to starting this thread is, shall we say, suspect?

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

On 18 Jul 2003 16:32:39 -0700, [email hidden] (Chet Hayes)

Quoted message said:

These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent

<plonk>

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

Quoted message said:

On 18 Jul 2003 16:32:39 -0700, [email hidden] (Chet Hayes)

Quoted message said:

These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent

Want to laugh?

Go to http://googlism.com/

Type in "Mu" and see what comes up...

Pretty funny stuff.

Mark
"Tis better to be silent and thought to be a fool, than to post to an internet
newsgroup and remove all doubt"

*Mu* <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On 18 Jul 2003 16:32:39 -0700, [email hidden] (Chet Hayes)

Quoted message said:

These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent

<plonk>

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

Clearly someone who lives to eat.

God Bless,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com

"Max Harris" <[email hidden] for Advertising CopyEdit Service... $5/word> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

*Mu* <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On 18 Jul 2003 16:32:39 -0700, [email hidden] (Chet Hayes)
wrote:

>These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent

<plonk>

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

Clearly someone who lives to eat.

Odd. Two posts that are nearly identical.

<illogical arguments snipped>

It is either identical or not.

Perhaps the word you were looking for was "similar."

I'll let English Professor Pastorio explain it to you.

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 01:03:48 GMT, "Max Harris" <[email hidden]

for Advertising CopyEdit Service... $5/word said:

Let's dissect this a little.

Oh, gooodeee, I always like AP lab.

Quoted message said:

Let's first examine Chet's posting. In the misguided interest of
fairness to Mu & Chung, I'll only quote the full passage that
Mu quoted.

Oh thank you Mr. Misguided.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>These guys are simply trolls and spammers ......

Quoted message said:

The response was a <Plonk> from Mu, with the addition of an idiotic
signature,

Idiotic sig?

Like this one?

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Max L. Harris
Email: maxlharris<AT>msn.com
Email: maxlharris<AT>yahoo.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"I'll walk right out into a brand new day
Insane and rising in my own weird way
I don't want to be the bad guy."
-Everclear "Santa Monica"

lol
lol
lol

Quoted message said:

Now, we have come to expect a lot less than a responsive
post from Mu.

Then why are you dissecting Mu if you know Mu?

Quoted message said:

We hardly expect coherence, and those of us with low
expectations are rewarded.

You're misguided AND low self-esteem.

alt.psychiatry for you!

Quoted message said:

I,
however,
suspect that it is Mu, as they seem to be acquaintances.

I have $10,000 that says you are right. Keep up. This point is old,
old, old and now older.

Quoted message said:

I
admit the possibility of that flaw in my discussion.

Misguided, low self-esteem AND flawed.

Proceed directly to your nearest psychologist.

Quoted message said:

In summation, Mu and Chung are proven to be rabble rousing trolls with
no respect for the low carb diet,

Not much.

Quoted message said:

ASDL-C,

Not much.

Quoted message said:

support
seekers who are not interested in their two pound diet, or really anyone
who is neither Mu nor Chung.

Your insane. Forget the psychiatrist.

Proceed directly to the sanitarium. A room with full padding and a
little window await you.

Quoted message said:

PS- My recommendation is that Mu not Live to Eat but rather Not Eat
to Not Live. Starvation. There's no diet quite like it.

Nope.

You missed my sig line. Must have been the glare from that billboard
sig of yours that you must be so impressed with.

One more time!

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:43:07 -0400, ".."

louisDOTjezsikATarinsoDOTcom said:

But for ol' Mike it's "If you don't [censored] in the middle of the floor, people
may never be offended."

I'm having trouble with Wolfenstein and I am looking for an overaged
geek-child to help me with it.

I hear your competent and meet the qualifications.

http://tinyurl.com/hl0m

lol

"Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"

Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

<snip> If the Encyclopedia

Quoted message said:

Britannia had two words changed in one edition of two, the two editions
could reasonably be described as "nearly identical."

Ok, two words in about 20 volumes = "nearly identical"

Now, reapply that criteria to the post in question.

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com

Dr. Andrew B. Chung said:

Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

<snip> If the Encyclopedia

Quoted message said:

Britannia had two words changed in one edition of two, the two editions
could reasonably be described as "nearly identical."

Ok, two words in about 20 volumes = "nearly identical"

Now, reapply that criteria to the post in question.

Here's what led to my demonstrating your ineptitude.

<<<<< begin quote >>>>>>>>
"Max Harris" wrote

Quoted message said:

Odd. Two posts that are nearly identical.

The Chungster wrote:
<illogical arguments snipped>

It is either identical or not.

Perhaps the word you were looking for was "similar."

I'll let English Professor Pastorio explain it to you.
<<<<<<<<< end quote >>>>>>>>

So, I did.

Pastorio

Bob Pastorio said:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung said:

Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

<snip> If the Encyclopedia

Quoted message said:

Britannia had two words changed in one edition of two, the two editions
could reasonably be described as "nearly identical."

Ok, two words in about 20 volumes = "nearly identical"

Now, reapply that criteria to the post in question.

<inability to follow instructions snipped>

Are you sure you are degreed in English?

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

Bob Pastorio said:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung said:

"Max Harris" <[email hidden] for Advertising CopyEdit Service... $5/word> wrote

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> *Mu* <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> > On 18 Jul 2003 16:32:39 -0700, [email hidden] (Chet Hayes)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >These guys are simply trolls and spammers intent
> >
> > <plonk>
> >
> > "Live To Eat? Nyet. Eat To Live!"
>
> Clearly someone who lives to eat.

Odd. Two posts that are nearly identical.

<illogical arguments snipped>

Interesting how often you do this snipping instead of dealing with the
rather telling blows being directed at you. Do you think that people
don't notice your skulking around behind those defiant little squeaks?

How's this for skulking?

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

Quoted message said:

How's this for skulking?

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

Do you really think that's scary, duck breath?

"JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

How's this for skulking?

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

Do you really think that's scary, duck breath?

It might be for Mr. Pastorio. Why don't you ask him?

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com

On 7/28/03 22:11, in article
[email hidden], "JC Der Koenig"

Quoted message said:

Didn't you die in a plane crash?

And oh btw, use your killfile if you know how.

Rumor has it I died in a French Brothel of, get this, a "Heart Attack".
That's a hoot, eh? The government covered it up so morale wouldn't be
affected and Jimmy Stewart's career could go on without problem.

As to using a killfile on that POS, no need. He can act a fool in public if
he likes.

JC Der Koenig said:

I feel so badly now. I wonder how many of the people I've libeled in the
past are going to sue me. Worry, worry, worry.

Oh, not any I would imagine since you have no money or assets worth
collecting.

Live To Eat? Nay. Eat To Live!

"///MU\" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

JC Der Koenig said:

I feel so badly now. I wonder how many of the people I've libeled in the
past are going to sue me. Worry, worry, worry.

Oh, not any I would imagine since you have no money or assets worth
collecting.

Oh good then.

MU is not a trainer of any sort, he is a psychotic quack just like little
Chung.