Might as well toss your fish oil pills into the chowder. You served salmon a
lot when you might have gotten the same health benefits with lean pork.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060324/hl_nm/omega3_dc
says Omega-3 is not really all that great.
Have you noticed how lately they tout something as a major health benefit
and then discount it after five years? The process is getting faster now,
they are already publishing stuff that doubts efficacy of Omega-3 benefits.
It's like all those years you were told to limit eggs. They recently changed
it and now say don't worry about it anymore.
We should be able to depend on the government to require at least that any
involvement by profit interests in these studies must be prominently
published so the consumer can judge whether it is science-based or
profit-based research --and requiring that any media report must include the
origin of these studies.
I know that can sometimes be a gray area, but if Chicken of the Sea is in
any way involved in health research on Tuna, it should be the most prominent
sponsor mentioned, by law. Then if later studies done independently
replicate it or not the consumer can be the judge. At least knowing the
corporate interest will provide a balanced skepticism.
How many people have in the past few years adjusted their diet to increase
Omega-3 as well as other so-called benefits that are rapidly falling by the
wayside. It's almost like if you set up a healthy eating-lifestyle two years
ago, it not only might be useless and outdated, but may prove harmful even
if it merely edges-out something else important.
I'm not talking about fad diets here. It has gotten to a point where actual
foods are competing with each other for ad space. I have a bag of dried
plums that says on the bag that it is better than bananas for potassium. The
problem is even doctors are swayed, so if you ask an opinion, they only have
the info the media, including journals, has.
With all the leaps that modern science is capable of you want to know if
your choices are at least not harmful. But you don't want to avoid something
then find out it never was harmful to begin with, or the other way around.
The Omega-3 studies they talked about today just [censored] me off. If you are
relatively healthy and live in an area that provides many choices, you have
less to be concerned about for the time being. But if you are in a position
where you must make choices for any reason there has to be some provisions
that require honesty, and punish misinformation.
A rant. I am getting fired up to play in a tournament tomorrow. Doesn't
anybody play badminton on this group?
--
Lefty
Life is for learning
The worst I ever had was wonderful