Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Too Far Forward

Started by Schnauzers · · Last activity · 14 posts · 836 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
12 September 2003
Last activity
17 September 2003
Original author
Schnauzers
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
836
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just bought a GT iDrive 2.0 for a second (actually third) bike. I tried it on a trail I built
    locally and nearly [censored] my pants going overa small jump. Even displacing my weight to the back, I
    felt like I would fly over the front on the landing. No matter what I do the bike always lands at a
    hard angle on the front. I have a Specialized SX that I use for serious stuff and never had a
    problem landing on the ass-end. I also have a FSR Comp that I wrecked at Vail. But, the front fork
    (X-VertR) is still in good shape. Do you think it's worth it to replace the Psylo on the GT with the
    X-VertR? Does anyone have any other tips for making my landings a bit safer/comfortable?

    Thanks!

    Schnauzers

  2. Schnauzers said:

    I just bought a GT iDrive 2.0 for a second (actually third) bike. I tried it on a trail I built
    locally and nearly [censored] my pants going overa small jump. Even displacing my weight to the back, I
    felt like I would fly over the front on the landing. No matter what I do the bike always lands at
    a hard angle on the front. I have a Specialized SX that I use for serious stuff and never had a
    problem landing on the ass-end. I also have a FSR Comp that I wrecked at Vail. But, the front fork
    (X-VertR) is still in good shape. Do you think it's worth it to replace the Psylo on the GT with
    the X-VertR? Does anyone have any other tips for making my landings a bit safer/comfortable?

    Thanks!

    Both the FSR and SX have more laid-back angles than the i-Drive, I believe. You just need to get
    used to it. Concentrate on getting your weight further back and pulling up more on the front. It
    will all come to you and then all you have to do is just wait for that puppy to break...

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  3. Try a set back seatpost .And a shorter stem this should move you back .

    --
    J/O Trailblazer At large !!

  4. Schnauzers

    Quoted message said:

    I just bought a GT iDrive 2.0 for a second (actually third) bike. I tried it on a trail I built
    locally and nearly [censored] my pants going overa small jump. Even displacing my weight to the back, I
    felt like I would fly over the front on the landing. No matter what I do the bike always lands at
    a hard angle on the front. I have a Specialized SX that I use for serious stuff and never had a
    problem landing on the ass-end. I also have a FSR Comp that I wrecked at Vail. But, the front fork
    (X-VertR) is still in good shape. Do you think it's worth it to replace the Psylo on the GT with
    the X-VertR? Does anyone have any other tips for making my landings a bit safer/comfortable?

    I had that problem when I got a bike where the frame was too small for
    me. I went over the bars a couple of times learning the hard way to keep my weight WAY back. A
    setback seatpost and moving the handle bars up and back helped some, but when I swapped-in a
    new frame (I broke the other 🙂) that was the same, but one size larger -- it made all the
    difference in the world.

    David

  5. Jamie <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:yUj8b.324726$cF.98326@rwcrnsc53...

    Quoted message said:

    Try a set back seatpost .And a shorter stem this should move you back .

    Seconded - if you haven't already got a short stem, then put one on, and maybe raise the bars some
    if you can, or get risers that are higher than the ones you got.

    Shaun aRe

  6. Well, the XvertR has an additional 4" riser on that. so maby swapiing the shocks is not a bad idea.
    It laready has a shorrt stem.

    "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Jamie <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:yUj8b.324726$cF.98326@rwcrnsc53...

    Quoted message said:

    Try a set back seatpost .And a shorter stem this should move you back .

    Seconded - if you haven't already got a short stem, then put one on, and maybe raise the bars some
    if you can, or get risers that are higher than


    the

    Quoted message said:

    ones you got.

    Shaun aRe

  7. Schnauzers said:

    Well, the XvertR has an additional 4" riser on that. so maby swapiing the shocks is not a
    bad idea.

    Yes, it is a bad idea to put dual-crowns on an XC bike.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  8. Why? Is it because of the turning radius?

    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Schnauzers said:

    Well, the XvertR has an additional 4" riser on that. so maby swapiing


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    shocks is not a bad idea.

    Yes, it is a bad idea to put dual-crowns on an XC bike.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    a.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  9. Schnauzers said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yes, it is a bad idea to put dual-crowns on an XC bike.


    Why? Is it because of the turning radius?

    No, it's because the i-Drive isn't designed to take the extra stresses that dual-crown forks exert
    on a frame. Put basically, it may well rip the headtube off your frame.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  10. Jamie said...

    Quoted message said:

    Try a set back seatpost .And a shorter stem this should move you back .

    Unfortunately, short stems can make for twitchy steering. Pick your poison, I guess.

  11. Super Slinky <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Jamie said...

    Quoted message said:

    Try a set back seatpost .And a shorter stem this should move you back .

    Unfortunately, short stems can make for twitchy steering. Pick your poison, I guess.

    Twitchy, or fast and responsive? ',;~}~

    Shaun aRe

  12. Shaun Rimmer said...

    Quoted message said:

    Twitchy, or fast and responsive? ',;~}~

    I guess you could look at it that way. I just put a short riser stem on my old GT after stripping
    out a cheap OEM one. I couldn't believe how much it changed the way handled. Got to get around to
    shelling out for a new stem now.

  13. Super Slinky <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Shaun Rimmer said...

    Quoted message said:

    Twitchy, or fast and responsive? ',;~}~

    I guess you could look at it that way.

    Well, it works for me! When I got back on an old bike of mine with a trad. 'XC' style long stem,
    fewlt like driving a bus - wide bars and short stem all the way, I love it, oh, and I need it to to
    be able to turn that fat [censored] tyreon dirt, heheheh.........

    Shaun aRe

  14. I have exactly this problem with my 98 GT Avalanche. I bought it before I knew much about mtb and got the 18in version. I'm a tad over 6 ft and feel like I'm going over the handlebars when I'm getting air. I havent had any luck finding a set back seatpost that I think is up to the job.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.