rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Finished the 29er vs. Coker debate. Made a purchase.

Started by molab · · Last activity · 8 posts · 253 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
23 March 2006
Last activity
25 March 2006
Original author
molab
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
253
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So I decided to go for the Coker...
    After seeing all the posts of "I got the 29er, now I have a coker I
    barely ride it..." made me realise I'd regret not getting the extra
    speed of a coker, but I can do without the manouverability of a 29er.
    So now my question is to current Coker riders.
    Anyone here from Sydney, Aus, that rides a coker?
    Would I be better to change from the 152s it came with to my Nimbus
    II's 114s?
    And I'm freemounting by holding the tyre with horizontal pedals and
    jumping on, is that right?
    At the moment I'm loving the speed and the smooth ride!
    Can't wait for my first decent ride on it!

    --
    molab
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    molab's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11474
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  2. I mount much like a static mount. A foot on the left pedal, lean
    forward a little, and then step up and onto the other pedal. Holding
    onto the tire felt too much like inviting a face plant. Very
    unsettling.

    --
    Trapper
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Trapper's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10341
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  3. You're already freemounting? Wow!
    I like the rolling mount, I can land it about half the time, but then I
    am a klutz. I have six-and-a-half inch cranks which work great on the
    hilly gravel roads I ride.
    Wear loose pants on your first rides, you will want to take this baby
    further than you have ever gone before and you don't want to be in
    anything resembling tight blue jeans!:p

    --
    carjug
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    carjug's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1228
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  4. I wouldn't be in a huge hurry to put shorter cranks on it, especially
    one's as short as 114mm. Once you're comfortable with the coker, you
    can go faster with less effort with short cranks, but at the expenense
    of a greater stopping distance and leverage (control). I use 125's on
    mine, and that's plenty short for me. I've put many many miles on 152's
    with a respectable amount of speed. It's also harder to mount with
    shorter cranks, and you sit higher up.

    molab said:

    So I decided to go for the Coker...
    After seeing all the posts of "I got the 29er, now I have a coker I
    barely ride it..." made me realise I'd regret not getting the extra
    speed of a coker, but I can do without the manouverability of a 29er.
    So now my question is to current Coker riders.
    Anyone here from Sydney, Aus, that rides a coker?
    Would I be better to change from the 152s it came with to my Nimbus
    II's 114s?
    And I'm freemounting by holding the tyre with horizontal pedals and
    jumping on, is that right?
    At the moment I'm loving the speed and the smooth ride!
    Can't wait for my first decent ride on it!

    --
    mscalisi
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    mscalisi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4961
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  5. molab said:

    So I decided to go for the Coker...
    After seeing all the posts of "I got the 29er, now I have a coker I
    barely ride it..." made me realise I'd regret not getting the extra
    speed of a coker, but I can do without the manouverability of a 29er.
    So now my question is to current Coker riders.
    Anyone here from Sydney, Aus, that rides a coker?
    Would I be better to change from the 152s it came with to my Nimbus
    II's 114s?
    And I'm freemounting by holding the tyre with horizontal pedals and
    jumping on, is that right?
    At the moment I'm loving the speed and the smooth ride!
    Can't wait for my first decent ride on it!

    Ken Looi is from New Zealand, but I don't know of anyone any nearer
    than that....
    I'd stick with the 152's for right now. once you get good at those,
    you ought to try the 114s.
    jumping on works, I guess, but what I do is put the pedals horizontal,
    the back foot on the back pedal, and step up on to the other pedal.
    then get riding.
    have fun!

    --
    James_Potter

    i still believe that all you need is love...john lennon

    mikael
    atkinson...............................................................................jonny
    peacock is my main man.
    mdotedotatkinsonatgmaildotcom
    *President of the 'MRIS' (http://tinyurl.com/dk2de)*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James_Potter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3807
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  6. Welcome to the club!!

    (I would get bored of the 152's before dropping to 127's)

    an arsenal of cranks is what you need,

    i have tride everything between 40's and 175's.

    110's are my favoutire for distance, 175's are my favourite for bombing
    around (it takes quite a bit of practice to get 175's working smoothly)
    and 127's for general purpse cruising.

    you are gonna LOVE that thing!

    --
    Brian MacKenzie

    'Training Wheel Not Required DVD - New 6min short as seen on
    www.unicycle.tv' (http://www.LBMmultimedia.com/videos/TWNR_uniTV.wmv)
    All proceeds from TWNR go directly into my next movie due for release
    Sept 1 2006
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brian MacKenzie's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7650
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  7. lol, yeah, I'm only a short flight away. I don't know any Sydney
    Cokeurers, but there are a few in Melbourne.

    I'd stick with 150's for now, and gradually work yourself down as you
    get used to it. Crank lengths are pretty personal, but use the
    shortest ones you can get away with- it's much smoother and you can
    ride for longer because it is much more comfortable to ride (less
    amplitude of leg movement). I like 110s for general use, 125's for
    steep hills, and 150's for off-road.

    Ken

    --
    GizmoDuck

    'www.adventureunicyclist.com' (http://www.adventureunicyclist.com/)
    'Laos Unicycle Tour' (http://www.laosunitour.org)
    'New Zealand Unicycle Federation' (http://www.unicycle.org.nz)

    The SINZ Unitour- coming soon......
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

  8. Thanks for the help guys,
    Looks like I'll be all on my own till I can inspire more to get into it

    --
    molab
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    molab's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11474
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/47987

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.