Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Done with wireless computers

Started by Versabar · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,610 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
22 March 2006
Last activity
24 March 2006
Original author
Versabar
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,610
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have had a wireless computer for about a 1/2 yr.
    Other than going nuts if you go over 50 mph, it worked pretty well.

    Today I hooked up a wireless cateye led pulsating headlamp.
    As soon as I turned the headlamp on, the computer showed me going 49mph STANDING STILL.

    Also other info readouts were going crazy.

    In the end, it fried the wireless unit completely. Its toast.

    If I get a goo wired unit, is there any chance of the same [censored] happening?

    Bill

  2. Versabar said:

    I have had a wireless computer for about a 1/2 yr.
    Other than going nuts if you go over 50 mph, it worked pretty well.

    Today I hooked up a wireless cateye led pulsating headlamp.
    As soon as I turned the headlamp on, the computer showed me going 49mph STANDING STILL.

    Also other info readouts were going crazy.

    In the end, it fried the wireless unit completely. Its toast.

    If I get a goo wired unit, is there any chance of the same [censored] happening?

    Bill


    Sometimes those things are just defective out of the Box. I use the ErgoBrain on my Road bike, which is wired and I still have a few problems here and there. Cat Eye actually makes the ErgoBrain for Campi, so perhaps try a different Brand? I used a Mavic one on my Trek for some time, loved it and still love em, although others I have worked on have all had problems of some kind. I recently aquired the new Blackburn for my Turner, so far its worked pretty well and thats the 5.0 Wireless

  3. Ive also had negative experience with wireless computers, VDO in this case, couldnt see a huge benefit in goint wireless, dont like the idea of 2 batteries. The only one ive ever really drooled over is the mavic with the sensor in the QR lever, thats just slick

  4. Wireless sensors really suck when you live in a city with streetcars/trams and other sources of low-lying high voltage lines.

    If it wasn't for the Polar integrated HRM/speed/cadence/datalogger setup being so handy, I'd switch back to a conventional wired unit in a heartbeat.

  5. Versabar said:

    I have had a wireless computer for about a 1/2 yr.
    Other than going nuts if you go over 50 mph, it worked pretty well.

    Today I hooked up a wireless cateye led pulsating headlamp.
    As soon as I turned the headlamp on, the computer showed me going 49mph STANDING STILL.

    Also other info readouts were going crazy.

    In the end, it fried the wireless unit completely. Its toast.

    If I get a goo wired unit, is there any chance of the same [censored] happening?

    Bill

    Mountainpro has posted on this very subject but "search" is disabled at the moment...can't pull it up.
    If I remember correctly,the pulsating headlamp is acting like a wireless signal to the computer.It shouldn't affect a wired unit as it doesnt rely on a radio signal.
    One of my speedos showed 100mph...wish I'd taken a photo before it self-destructed.
    If you want to search mp's (many) posts there is a pretty good technical explanation on one of them.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.