Road Cycling · Public discussion

Tailwind makes races harder

Started by Jenko · · Last activity · 9 posts · 619 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 March 2006
Last activity
21 March 2006
Original author
Jenko
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
619
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Yesterday's MSR was, I believe, the fastest in history at an average speed over
    45 km/h (well, I've just found that it was faster in 1990, so make this one is
    the second). That was not because the riders decided to just go faster. As
    usual, there was a break getting minutes and being caught at the foot of the
    Cipressa, which is not particularly early. There wasn't either big horsepower in
    the break so, if unlike in 1990 you are willing to rule out some new doping
    technique, the extra speed can essentially be attributed to tailwind.

    Now, tailwind is hardly noticed when sheltered inside the peloton, it's mainly
    the riders pulling in front that benefit from it. This MSR edition was around 7%
    faster than average. Translated into power, that's around +15% for the riders
    drafting. If you accept blood lactate as a proxy for physiological stress, and
    that blood lactate is proportional to W^4, we have a 60% increase in stress due
    to tailwind alone. That's big. Being more conservative and assuming a
    quadratical relationship between power and "hardness", as TSS does, it's still
    +30%. The 7% time reduction doesn't compensate enough for that.

    I haven't taken into account so far the impact of climbs, of which there are a
    few in MSR, so I'll do:
    1. In MSR climbs typically take a different direction than the main road, which
    leads to cross and head-winds (not to mention the turns). This is indeed the
    case at Cipressa and Poggio. The dominant tailwind effect is less present there.

    2. Gravity. It reduces both the speed increase caused by tailwind, and the power
    increase caused by the speed increment. The +15% above would become roughly +5%
    power (+10% stress) in the MSR slopes

    3. Riders go harder at climbs, with power there being around twice the power in
    flats, so climbs take a relatively higher toll. However, less than 10% of MSR is
    spent climbing. All in all, climbing and flats contribution to normalized power
    during MSR is 60% and 40% respectively, with more weight for flats with tailwind.

    With these numbers, we can estimate that tailwind yesterday made MSR more than
    15% harder, which was noticeable on many riders in the finale, even if there was
    not a big selection in the peloton.

    But that's not all. The impact of tailwind is not the same for all riders. Since
    it leads to a higher contribution of flats to TSS and to a higher increase of
    required power also in flats, tailwind gives rouleurs an advantage climbers; big
    motors over lightweights; Petacchi, Boonen, Pozzatto and Ballan over Freire,
    Cunego, Bettini and Valverde. Props then to Sanchez, Nocentini and Paolini for
    their good performances.

    Discuss.

    Jenko

  2. Jenko <[email hidden]> writes:

    The main difficulty in MSR is not the wind or the climbs which,
    excluding the Cipressa, are no real challenge

    The main difficulty is boredom

    --
    Le Vent à Dos, Davey Crockett - Actively Opposing Thought Crime
    Libérez Ingrid Betancourt, Clara Rojas et les autres
    http://www.ingridbetancourt-idf.com/base/
    Free Ernst Zundel http://www.zundelsite.org/gallery/donations/index.html
    Free David Irving http://www.petitiononline.com/DavidI/petition.html

  3. Jenko said:

    Discuss.

    http://www.ucolick.org/~bjw/misc/rbr/powergap_withvel.png

  4. Jenko said:

    Yesterday's MSR was, I believe, the fastest in history at an average speed over
    45 km/h (well, I've just found that it was faster in 1990, so make this one is
    the second). That was not because the riders decided to just go faster. As
    usual, there was a break getting minutes and being caught at the foot of the
    Cipressa, which is not particularly early. There wasn't either big horsepower in
    the break so, if unlike in 1990 you are willing to rule out some new doping
    technique, the extra speed can essentially be attributed to tailwind.

    Now, tailwind is hardly noticed when sheltered inside the peloton, it's mainly
    the riders pulling in front that benefit from it. This MSR edition was around 7%
    faster than average. Translated into power, that's around +15% for the riders
    drafting. If you accept blood lactate as a proxy for physiological stress, and
    that blood lactate is proportional to W^4, we have a 60% increase in stress due
    to tailwind alone. That's big. Being more conservative and assuming a
    quadratical relationship between power and "hardness", as TSS does, it's still
    +30%. The 7% time reduction doesn't compensate enough for that.

    I haven't taken into account so far the impact of climbs, of which there are a
    few in MSR, so I'll do:
    1. In MSR climbs typically take a different direction than the main road, which
    leads to cross and head-winds (not to mention the turns). This is indeed the
    case at Cipressa and Poggio. The dominant tailwind effect is less present there.

    2. Gravity. It reduces both the speed increase caused by tailwind, and the power
    increase caused by the speed increment. The +15% above would become roughly +5%
    power (+10% stress) in the MSR slopes

    3. Riders go harder at climbs, with power there being around twice the power in
    flats, so climbs take a relatively higher toll. However, less than 10% of MSR is
    spent climbing. All in all, climbing and flats contribution to normalized power
    during MSR is 60% and 40% respectively, with more weight for flats with tailwind.

    With these numbers, we can estimate that tailwind yesterday made MSR more than
    15% harder, which was noticeable on many riders in the finale, even if there was
    not a big selection in the peloton.

    But that's not all. The impact of tailwind is not the same for all riders. Since
    it leads to a higher contribution of flats to TSS and to a higher increase of
    required power also in flats, tailwind gives rouleurs an advantage climbers; big
    motors over lightweights; Petacchi, Boonen, Pozzatto and Ballan over Freire,
    Cunego, Bettini and Valverde. Props then to Sanchez, Nocentini and Paolini for
    their good performances.

    Discuss.

    Jenko

    Seems you're making a couple of false assumptions.

    You state that we should equate blood lactate w/ physiological stress,
    and go on to make reference to blood lactate being preportional to W^4
    (which I'm assuming you are using as a term for wattage requirements.
    Can't say definitively, as you haven't defined your terms).

    Anyway, what you haven't taken into account is that the very thing
    you're blaming for the increase in stress is the one thing that
    actually made it less stressful. The tailwind made it easier to go
    fast w/ less power, and therefore it is not safe to assume that the
    extra speed came at the expense of extra wattage or stress.

    You're assumption that the higher speed made the race more stressful is
    only accurate IF the speed came at the expense of greater power
    requirements. Hell, for all we know, the riders may have thought it to
    be less stressful as the higher speeds came w/out any particular
    increase in power requirements.

    Higher speeds = higher stress only if the speed requires more power to
    attain it.

    You're making the same argument that a rider who goes 24mph on the
    flats, solo... suffers more stress when riding at 26mph when in the
    draft, when we all know it's easier to ride in the draft.

    Fred

  5. Quoted message said:


    Seems you're making a couple of false assumptions.

    You state that we should equate blood lactate w/ physiological stress,
    and go on to make reference to blood lactate being proportional to W^4
    (which I'm assuming you are using as a term for wattage requirements.
    Can't say definitively, as you haven't defined your terms).

    They are taken from
    http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/PowerTrainingChapter.pdf
    Anyway, I'm more comfortable with a quadratic relationship between power and
    physiological strain, and that's what I use for my conclusions. Sorry I wasn't
    clear. What power to strain relationship would you suggest instead?

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, what you haven't taken into account is that the very thing
    you're blaming for the increase in stress is the one thing that
    actually made it less stressful. The tailwind made it easier to go
    fast w/ less power, and therefore it is not safe to assume that the
    extra speed came at the expense of extra wattage or stress.

    But only partially. See
    http://www.tourdefrancenews.com/tourdefrance/experts/columns/0,5976,s1-12415-527,00.html?category_id=527
    Basically, there are two factors: more rolling resistance and reduced wind
    velocity. If we assume that drag reduction when drafting is proportional to
    speed, a 7% increase in speed from tailwind results in 5% extra power. Not yet
    the 15% I claimed, but I believe the drag reduction to speed relationship to be
    superlinear. I can provide some anecdotal evidence to support it, but not
    convincing hard data or references.

    Jenko

  6. Robert Chung said:
    Jenko said:

    Discuss.

    http://www.ucolick.org/~bjw/misc/rbr/powergap_withvel.png

    I remember that thread. But Ben was interested in the speed/grade threshold that
    causes a rider to get dropped. In MSR, favorites don't get dropped, they just
    pay a different toll because of distance and pace which affects their abilities
    up the Poggio and in the sprint. I'm interested in knowing how wind affects
    that, or why, despite a light overall tailwind in the Poggio, they went slower
    through it, yet the attacker's managed to open a considerable gap.

    The data in the link above suggests that tailwind eases the race for breakaway
    groups (30% speed increase for a mere 5% power increase). However, when hidden
    in the peloton a rider can have a drag reduction over 50%, and the numbers would
    work against him.

    Jenko

  7. Dumbass -

    Ya, tailwinds make a race harder. That's why the easiest races are the
    ones that go right into the wind. Good argument.

    -RJ

  8. Forgot to mention: Do you know what makes a race really hard?
    Downhills. The Red Bull Road Rage is the hardest race in the world.

    -RJ

  9. Jenko said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Jenko said:

    Discuss.

    http://www.ucolick.org/~bjw/misc/rbr/powergap_withvel.png

    I remember that thread. But Ben was interested in the speed/grade threshold that
    causes a rider to get dropped. In MSR, favorites don't get dropped, they just
    pay a different toll because of distance and pace which affects their abilities
    up the Poggio and in the sprint. I'm interested in knowing how wind affects
    that, or why, despite a light overall tailwind in the Poggio, they went slower
    through it, yet the attacker's managed to open a considerable gap.

    The data in the link above suggests that tailwind eases the race for breakaway
    groups (30% speed increase for a mere 5% power increase). However, when hidden
    in the peloton a rider can have a drag reduction over 50%, and the numbers would
    work against him.

    Jenko

    Jeezus - You're like a dripping tap

    Take this from a guy who rode MSR in it's various incarnations
    19 [NINETEEN] times

    Boredom is the major difficulty in MSR, or in fact any Derby

    --
    Le Vent à Dos, Davey Crockett - Actively Opposing Thought Crime
    Libérez Ingrid Betancourt, Clara Rojas et les autres
    http://www.ingridbetancourt-idf.com/base/
    Free Ernst Zundel http://www.zundelsite.org/gallery/donations/index.html
    Free David Irving http://www.petitiononline.com/DavidI/petition.html

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.