UK and Europe · Public discussion

Martlew again

Started by Just zis Guy, you know? · · Last activity · 12 posts · 461 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 March 2006
Last activity
16 March 2006
Original author
Just zis Guy, you know?
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
461
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Fat Eric has already started making noises in the next stage of the
    Road Safety Bill, he is angling to be on the scrutiny committee.
    Anyone in is constituency who sends the CTC contact form is likely to
    get short shrift (any constituents of his on here?) on the basis that
    CTC is "anti-helmet" and therefore apparently has no right to make any
    statement on road safety.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  2. Looks like he was given short shrift himself according to this site.

    http://www.durhamlabour.org.uk/martlew/hoc.htm#Cycle%20Helmets

  3. On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:05:24 +0000 someone who may be "Just zis Guy,
    you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Fat Eric has already started making noises in the next stage of the
    Road Safety Bill, he is angling to be on the scrutiny committee.

    Perhaps we should attach a sticker to kim, which says "This man is a
    pipe bomb":-)

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  4. David Hansen said:

    On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:05:24 +0000 someone who may be "Just zis Guy,
    you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Fat Eric has already started making noises in the next stage of the
    Road Safety Bill, he is angling to be on the scrutiny committee.

    Perhaps we should attach a sticker to kim, which says "This man is a
    pipe bomb":-)

    Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)

    --
    Tony

    "The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
    right."
    - Lord Hailsham

  5. Tony Raven said:
    David Hansen said:

    Perhaps we should attach a sticker to kim, which says "This man is a
    pipe bomb":-)

    Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)


    <pedant>
    little boy or fat man, little boy being a U235 gun type and fat man a
    Pu implosion device.
    </pedant>

    Tim.

  6. Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)


    <pedant>
    little boy or fat man, little boy being a U235 gun type and fat man a
    Pu implosion device.
    </pedant>

    Tim.

    <better pedant>

    "Fatboy" or "gadget" was the prototype Pu implosion device exploded in
    the 16 July 1945 Trinity test in the desert of New Mexico.

    </better pedant>

    --
    Tony

    "The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
    right."
    - Lord Hailsham

  7. in message <[email hidden]>,

    (') said:


    Tony Raven said:
    David Hansen said:

    Perhaps we should attach a sticker to kim, which says "This man is a
    pipe bomb":-)

    Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)


    <pedant>
    little boy or fat man, little boy being a U235 gun type and fat man a
    Pu implosion device.
    </pedant>

    Well he was a little boy but now he's a fat man. Happy?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; 'I think we should trust our president in every decision
    ;; that he makes and we should just support that'
    ;; Britney Spears of George W Bush, CNN 04:09:03

  8. On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:51:10 +0000,

    Tony Raven said:
    Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)


    <pedant>
    little boy or fat man, little boy being a U235 gun type and fat man a
    Pu implosion device.
    </pedant>

    Tim.

    <better pedant>

    "Fatboy" or "gadget" was the prototype Pu implosion device exploded in
    the 16 July 1945 Trinity test in the desert of New Mexico.

    </better pedant>


    I've never heard gadget called Fatboy and google doesn't turn up
    anything for me YMMV.

    Are you sure you're not getting confused with thin man, which was the
    original proposed Pu239 gun type device. Subsequently abandoned when
    the "mass production" of plutonium still had about 0.9% Pu240.
    (I forget where they were produced but the original Pu samples were
    almost pure Pu239)

    I would have expected fat boy to be a uranium implosion device. I'm
    pretty sure some devices of this type have been tested BICBW (and
    certainly not tested before the end of WWII)

    Tim.

    --
    God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
    and there was light.

    http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/

  9. Tim Woodall said:


    I've never heard gadget called Fatboy and google doesn't turn up
    anything for me YMMV.

    From the Los Alamos Newsletter 19 July 2004 (and they should know)

    "1945 — Final preparations begin at the New
    Mexico test site, the Jornada del Muerto at the
    Alamagordo Bombing Range, for the first
    atomic bomb test, code named Trinity. The
    date is set for July 16. The experimental
    atomic bomb “Fat Boy” was set off at 5:30
    a.m. in the New Mexican desert, creating a
    mushroom cloud rising 41,000 feet. The bomb
    emitted heat three times the temperature of
    the interior of the sun and wiped out all plant
    and animal life within a mile."

    It was the same design as Fat Man and the Trinity test was because there
    were doubts whether Neddermeyer's implosion design would work whereas
    the Uranium gun device was felt to be fairly certain bet(which is why it
    was the first dropped and dropped without a live test beforehand).

    --
    Tony

    "The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
    right."
    - Lord Hailsham

  10. "Tim Woodall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:51:10 +0000,

    Tony Raven said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tony Raven wrote:
    > Surely Fatboy is an atomic bomb ;-)
    >
    <pedant>
    little boy or fat man, little boy being a U235 gun type and fat man a
    Pu implosion device.
    </pedant>

    Tim.

    <better pedant>

    "Fatboy" or "gadget" was the prototype Pu implosion device exploded in
    the 16 July 1945 Trinity test in the desert of New Mexico.

    </better pedant>


    I've never heard gadget called Fatboy and google doesn't turn up
    anything for me YMMV.

    "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" according to this google result (second on the
    results page with the string "first atomic bomb"😉:

    http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa050300a.htm

  11. Response to jtaylor:

    Quoted message said:

    "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" according to this google result (second on the
    results page with the string "first atomic bomb"😉:

    http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa050300a.htm

    Acksherly, I Think You'll Find that "Fat Boy" was in fact the signature
    number of Fats Navarro, the brilliant and influential bebop trumpeter.

    Glad to have cleared that one up. ;-)

    --
    Mark, UK
    "Morals consist of political morals, commercial morals, ecclesiastical
    morals, and morals."

  12. On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:05:24 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
    <[email hidden]> said in <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Fat Eric has already started making noises in the next stage of the
    Road Safety Bill, he is angling to be on the scrutiny committee.

    Committee now announced, Martlew is *not* on it, but neither are any
    of the known pro-cycling MPs - although Dr. Ladyman is at least well
    informed and solidly behind the idea of cycling as good for public
    health.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.