Re: 29 versus 26 inch (sic) MTB tire comparison

oilfreeandhappy said:

Interesting. This is the opposite of what I would have expected. But
I also wasn't aware of the misnomers for the two tire sizes. The
bicycle industry could use some standardization.
Jim
http://home.comcast.net/~oil_free_and_happy/

It already has standardization; that the standard is ignored is the problem.

In article
<[email hidden]>,
"oilfreeandhappy" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Interesting. This is the opposite of what I would have expected. But
I also wasn't aware of the misnomers for the two tire sizes. The
bicycle industry could use some standardization.

Oh, it has many standards. Do you have a proposal for another?

--
Michael Press

Not really. To be honest, I don't know about the history and the
current standards.
Jim
http://home.comcast.net/~oil_free_and_happy/

oilfreeandhappy said:

Not really. To be honest, I don't know about the history and the
current standards.

Um, what?

In article <[email hidden]>,

oilfreeandhappy said:

Not really. To be honest, I don't know about the history and the
current standards.
Jim

Jim, your posting style - specifically that you don't quote the message
you're responding to - makes for incoherence and discontinuity.

Henceforth, how about quoting (with an attribution) the post that
elicited your response? Eg:
__________________

In article <[email hidden]>,

oilfreeandhappy said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
Michael Press <[email hidden]> wrote:

Oh, it has many standards. Do you have a proposal for another?

Not really. To be honest, I don't know about the history and the
current standards.
Jim