Is this considered spam?

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/ <<

Of course.

It's you posting spam.

Dillhole.

If you have to ask.......ITS SPAM YOU LIMEY [censored]!

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

He is pretty good. I saw a kid once who did this sort of thing. His dad
owned a shooting range including skeet and trap shooting. This kid, who was
about 14 at the time, could outshoot anybody on the shotgun range. And he
used a .22 to do it. Not much room for error with that little slug.

But he started shooting from a very young age and grew up with it. I wonder
what the ammo bill was for that kid by the time he left hme.

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Kewl. I want one.

Don't let [censored] Cheney have one.

David

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:35:59 GMT, "David Cohen"
<[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Kewl. I want one.

I'm still trying to figure out what technology it uses to cycle the
action (gas or recoil). Also, I wonder if it's adjustable. I've seen
many a Black Eagle fail to fire on light target loads and have fired
heavy waterfowl loads that kicked like a mule. The point being it may
be a horseshit shotgun for waterfowl. But, who wants to use a $1000+
shotgun for waterfowl because it WILL rust to some degree.

I have a Baikal that has a patent pending adjustable action that uses
recoil to cycle the action. It actually works pretty good and I'd
like to see more manufacturers use that technology. Who'd a thunk the
Ruskies would have come up with that one.

Quoted message said:

Don't let [censored] Cheney have one.

There may be a reason he's limited to a 28 gauge.

John Hanson said:

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:35:59 GMT, "David Cohen"
<[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Kewl. I want one.

I'm still trying to figure out what technology it uses to cycle the
action (gas or recoil). Also, I wonder if it's adjustable. I've seen
many a Black Eagle fail to fire on light target loads and have fired
heavy waterfowl loads that kicked like a mule. The point being it may
be a horseshit shotgun for waterfowl. But, who wants to use a $1000+
shotgun for waterfowl because it WILL rust to some degree.

I have a Baikal that has a patent pending adjustable action that uses
recoil to cycle the action. It actually works pretty good and I'd
like to see more manufacturers use that technology. Who'd a thunk the
Ruskies would have come up with that one.

My guess is that it's an adjustable gas-op. Probably a light alloy
barrel, too. Open the gas port wide, toss in some low-brass shells,
and add an impressive trick shooter.

John Hanson said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Very impressive but I understand his bench press is [censored]! ;o)

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Personally, I found the pictures of pretty young things in the left
margin - in my local geographical area, no less - more interesting than
the gun. But that's just me.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

Steve Freides said:

Personally, I found the pictures of pretty young things in the left
margin - in my local geographical area,

That can't be, because they were in MY geographical area...

Steve Freides said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Personally, I found the pictures of pretty young things in the left
margin - in my local geographical area, no less - more interesting than
the gun. But that's just me.

They were in your local area because the web site read your IP
address.

JMW said:

They were in your local area because the web site read your IP
address.

Maybe in his case, but in mine they just wanted ME.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Steve Freides said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, it is an ad.

http://www.compfused.com/directlink/1206/

Personally, I found the pictures of pretty young things in the left
margin - in my local geographical area, no less - more interesting
than
the gun. But that's just me.

They were in your local area because the web site read your IP
address.

This I know - I work on computers for most of my living, much of it
configuring networks. Whether it read my IP, had some sort of cookie
here from something else, I don't care. I still think it's cool.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

JMW said:

They were in your local area because the web site read your IP
address.

Maybe in his case, but in mine they just wanted ME.

On behalf of every decent person in this ng, I beg you to find another
hobby.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:34:22 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On behalf of every decent person in this ng, I beg you to find another
hobby.

What do you mean? Are you just jealous because all those hot chicks in
"my area" want me, and none in your area want you? It even says they
"are waiting for you" (me).

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:34:22 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On behalf of every decent person in this ng

That narrows the field considerably...
Since I am the only decent person here, it must mean my opinion is the
only one that counts?

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:34:22 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On behalf of every decent person in this ng, I beg you to find another
hobby.

What do you mean? Are you just jealous because all those hot chicks in
"my area" want me, and none in your area want you? It even says they
"are waiting for you" (me).

Mebbe. The last chick who wanted me, she demanded fifty bucks at the end of
it

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:44:31 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Mebbe. The last chick who wanted me, she demanded fifty bucks at the end of
it

Obviously she wasn't a pro, they get money upfront, beforehand. But
the going rate is $40, but a $10 tip is called for if the services
performed were above and beyond the effort normally required to
consumate the act (tip her if she swallows) so all things considered
you got laid for the going rate. That's not so bad.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:44:31 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Mebbe. The last chick who wanted me, she demanded fifty bucks at the end
of
it

Obviously she wasn't a pro, they get money upfront, beforehand. But
the going rate is $40, but a $10 tip is called for if the services
performed were above and beyond the effort normally required to
consumate the act (tip her if she swallows) so all things considered
you got laid for the going rate. That's not so bad.

Be that as it may, I would *never* pay for it. (I only had $18.40 on me that
time in any case)

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:11:22 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Be that as it may, I would *never* pay for it. (I only had $18.40 on me that
time in any case)

So did you pat her the $18.40? Or 'stiff' her?

Quoted message said:

So did you pat

"Pay", not pat.