How to gain weight ?

On 13 Feb 2006 20:31:26 -0800, "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"John" <[email hidden]> wrote in

Quoted message said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

David

John said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

Pregnancy always worked pretty well for me.

Dally

David Cohen said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"John" <[email hidden]> wrote in

Quoted message said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
equilibrium.

"DZ" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David Cohen said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>Hi,
>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>
>Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
equilibrium.

Yes.

Exactly.

David

DZ said:

David Cohen said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>Hi,
>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>
>Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
equilibrium.

Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

"John" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

http://www.dragondoor.com/articler/mode3/334?kbid=1022

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

In article <[email hidden]>,

John said:

Hi,
I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!

Any suggestion for the same ?

Eat more?
--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

JMW said:

DZ said:

David Cohen said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>Hi,
>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>
> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.

Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
equilibrium.

Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface area"
(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical, and reasonable agreement with
experiment is achieved."

"Since little of the body mass is in the legs or head, the remainder
was modelled as either a sphere (when standing) or a hemisphere (when
sitting)."

DZ said:

JMW said:

DZ said:

David Cohen <[email hidden]> wrote:
> "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>>Hi,
>>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>>
>> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.
>
> Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.

Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
equilibrium.

Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface area"
(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical ...

.... which is why they work so well in the FAA's chicken cannon.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JMW said:

DZ said:

JMW said:

DZ wrote:
>David Cohen <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>>> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>>>Hi,
>>>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>>>
>>> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.
>>
>> Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.
>
>Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
>usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
>well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
>equilibrium.

Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface area"
(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical ...

... which is why they work so well in the FAA's chicken cannon.

So post the joke already? ;-)
I have it in my files if you don't...
--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

JMW said:

DZ said:

JMW said:

DZ wrote:
>David Cohen <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>>> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>>>Hi,
>>>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>>>
>>> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.
>>
>> Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.
>
>Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
>usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
>well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
>equilibrium.

Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface area"
(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical ...

... which is why they work so well in the FAA's chicken cannon.

Some may not know but they were actually testing a spy plane that was
supposed to withstand a direct hit by a real frozen bird abundant over
Siberia.

DZ said:

JMW said:

DZ said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
> DZ wrote:
>>David Cohen <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>>>> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>>>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>>>>
>>>> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.
>>>
>>> Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.
>>
>>Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
>>usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
>>well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
>>equilibrium.
>
> Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface area"
(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical ...

... which is why they work so well in the FAA's chicken cannon.

Some may not know but they were actually testing a spy plane that was
supposed to withstand a direct hit by a real frozen bird abundant over
Siberia.

It is rumored that it was a frozen chicken, not a Soviet SAM, that took
out Powers's U2. It is also rumored that the Soviet GULAG system had
numerous poultry farms where dissidents were forced to work on this
nefarious weapons plan.

"DZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

JMW said:

DZ said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
> DZ wrote:
>>David Cohen <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote
>>>> "John" <[email hidden]> wrote in
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>I have been trying my best to put on some weight !!!
>>>>>Any suggestion for the same ?
>>>>
>>>> Eat a lot and pick up heavy things.
>>>
>>> Save time. Pick up heavy things, and eat them.
>>
>>Shame on you. How very non-scientific. First, we need to assume the
>>usual regularity conditions, trivially satisfied for this problem, as
>>well as a pointwise differentiable lowfat spherical chicken in stable
>>equilibrium.
>
> Lowfat spherical chicken rawks, dewd!

In a joke, a brave mathematician confidently asserts that he was able
to tackle a difficult problem until ... oh no ... we hear the
proverbial "Let's assume a spherical chicken".

But the story IS REAL!

http://www.maths-in-industry.org/archive/00000042/01/misg2004poultry.pdf

"radius of spherical chicken" \propto "chicken volume"/"chicken surface

area"

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

(equation 5)

"It is not absurd to treat the chicken as a sphere ... - without
feathers they are roughly spherical ...

... which is why they work so well in the FAA's chicken cannon.

Some may not know but they were actually testing a spy plane that was
supposed to withstand a direct hit by a real frozen bird abundant over
Siberia.

Been watching Myth Busters?