Road Cycling · Public discussion
interesting editorials re. WADA
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 22 February 2006
- Last activity
- 23 February 2006
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 293
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted message said:
That's an interesting read. I didn't know about the alcohol regs.
Really idiotic.R
-
Just scanned the articles, but they sounded a little hysterical to me,
and ignoring the problem WADA has to deal with.EG. Slate The alcohol amounts are set by different jurisdictions, not
covered by WADA. Why is that idiotic? As for why the difference,
maybe with 2/10's you don't get an advantage (eg calming of nerves) in
billiards, while 3/10's in boating corresponds to impairment.
Different problems, different amounts. Weak thinking and writing.As for Rushall and colleague, it sounds like grandstanding on details
to me. Steroids don't work? Maye for some untrained people, but how
is that relevant to our problem? The label for steroids in the WADA
list is a big issue? -
mtb Dad said:
Just scanned the articles, but they sounded a little hysterical to me,
and ignoring the problem WADA has to deal with.EG. Slate The alcohol amounts are set by different jurisdictions, not
covered by WADA. Why is that idiotic? As for why the difference,
maybe with 2/10's you don't get an advantage (eg calming of nerves) in
billiards, while 3/10's in boating corresponds to impairment.
Different problems, different amounts. Weak thinking and writing.Interesting. I hadn't thought about it that way. I don't normally
think of alcohol as a performance enhancing product. Although I have
been known to _think_ my performance has been better while under the
influence. 😉R
-
Looks like somebody has a barrow to push.
-
Not sure what you mean.
-
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Looks like somebody has a barrow to push.
"mtb Dad" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Not sure what you mean.
Probably "someone with a mission" (to keep WADA honest maybe).
Phil H
-
Phil Holman said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Looks like somebody has a barrow to push.
"mtb Dad" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Not sure what you mean.
Probably "someone with a mission" (to keep WADA honest maybe).
Phil H
If so, I suggest bad criticism is worse than none. I generally like
what WADA is doing, but believe all institutions need checks and
balances. Such as some real probing into the false positives like
Betke?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.