Talking about barriers across cycle and walking routes, is anyone aware of any test cases which have been brought under the DDA? I am not aware of any, and I am beginning to think that it is time there was one. Once a test case has been successful, one would then hope that letters of complaint to councils could have some backup.
My borough, Southwark, to their credit generally seem to be very good. But there are horrors in neighbouring boroughs.
Talking about barriers across cycle and walking routes, is anyone aware of any test cases which have been brought under the DDA?
In York, most barriers have a gate next to them with key access. Keys are given out to disabled people, and I've seen one mother with kids in a trailer with a key as well, so there must be other criteria.
In York, most barriers have a gate next to them with key access. Keys are given out to disabled people, and I've seen one mother with kids in a trailer with a key as well, so there must be other criteria.
These would be RADAR keys.
I fully support RADAR keys when used for accessible toilets etc. I'm not supportive for their use on outdoor barriers, as I would imagine the locks would rust and stop working, or at the very least need maintenance. Also how can a wheelchair bound person on their own open a heavy metal gate? Sorry Arthur - not having a go at you.
The solution is surely not to inconvenience, or bar people with wheelchairs, prams, bikes from paths but to deal with the yobboes who are breaking the law.
Prolly not even yobs. Illegal riding of motorbikes was solved in my area by building an off-road course on some waste ground (privately built of course). Great fun.
Prolly not even yobs. Illegal riding of motorbikes was solved in my area by building an off-road course on some waste ground (privately built of course). Great fun.
That's a great idea. Any writeups on it which we could find online?
That's a great idea. Any writeups on it which we could find online?
Probably not. The whole thing was completely, totally and utterly unnofficial as far as I know. Just some waste ground well away from houses (so no noise issues) that someone made into a dirt track. In theory anyone using it was probably tresspassing, but no signs, fences etc. A friend met the owner/builder of the track who seemed quite pleased others were using it.
It's quite possible that the owner of the land was completely unaware of the kids whizzing round it on bikes, and that it was 'built' on the sly. Certainly gets a few people out of the legal fears, makes it ten times better (no opening times, insurance worries, required kit, FREE to users and tax payers alike etc). The whole area has been redeveloped now. Was in Murston, near Sittingbourne in Kent.
Given that the whole thing was completely unnofficial, I doubt you'd find anything about it on the web or anywhere else.
Prolly not even yobs. Illegal riding of motorbikes was solved in my area by building an off-road course on some waste ground (privately built of course). Great fun.
That's a great idea. Any writeups on it which we could find online?
An example of how NOT to build facilities for the yutes is here. The council wanted to displace the skateboarding rollerblading BMXing yutes from the city centre as they spoiled the view, so they completely failed to consult with any of the skater-types or the skate shops, but instead built a skate park in an old playground frequented by drug dealers and other similarly unsavoury folk in a neighborhood with a history of assaults.
They then passed a bylaw prohibiting skateboarding/rollerblading/cycling/etc in the city centre, enforced it with roaming "ambassadors", and advertised it with draconic handouts which were so loosely worded it implied a much wider prohibition than there actually was.
Then they wondered publically why none of the kids were using this skatepark they'd spent all this money on.
Sheffield. I wasn't going to embarrass them, but...well, I shall.
Shame. I'd like to hope that Edinburgh council could learn from other's mistakes, but as I left, they were in the planning stages for a similar project to get those naster BMXers and skater types out of Bristo Square (Where if we're perfectly honest, they do little harm) and move them well out of the centre of town into a far corner of a park.
I fully support RADAR keys when used for accessible toilets etc. I'm not supportive for their use on outdoor barriers, as I would imagine the locks would rust and stop working, or at the very least need maintenance. Also how can a wheelchair bound person on their own open a heavy metal gate?
IME the problem is not so much with the locks rusting as with the gates themselves rusting to the posts.
There are 3 RADAR gates on my commute. They were all refurbished last spring, after I complained to the council that it was an effort for 2 fit, able-bodied men to open them.
10(ish) months on, one of them is still in good working order. One is rusted badly enough that, after a friend and I opened it so that he could get his trike through, we were unable to close it again. The third opens easily enough, but will never be able to open fully because it has been built into a bank: <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/z-bollards/gate02.jpg>
In York, most barriers have a gate next to them with key access. Keys are given out to disabled people, and I've seen one mother with kids in a trailer with a key as well, so there must be other criteria.
My wife was given a key when she complained to the council about the anti-motorcycle barriers that had been installed at all entrances to all parks in South Gloucestershire. They did nothing to keep motorbikes out, but they were very effective at denying access to children in double buggies.
I then had a copy made. The copy is much more convenient to carry - the real keys have a huge head, presumably to make them easier for those with limited dexterity to handle.
BTW, the barriers have now been removed following an article in the local paper about children in pushchairs being denied access to parks. They lasted about a year. Nice to know my council tax is being well spent.
Shame. I'd like to hope that Edinburgh council could learn from other's mistakes, but as I left, they were in the planning stages for a similar project to get those naster BMXers and skater types out of Bristo Square (Where if we're perfectly honest, they do little harm) and move them well out of the centre of town into a far corner of a park.
A skateboard-type gave a fascinating talk at a landscape architects' meeting I attended. He showed some examples where a council had just shoved in a skate park, but it was technically appalling (in the sense that skateboarders/etc could do very little in it, as the ramps were the wrong sort of ramp in the wrong sort of position [1], and the fact that they'd made them hollow (skin over a frame) led to homeless/etc sleeping under them. He then showed some excellent examples where skaters were involved in the design, had got them right, and were using otherwise 'dead' space, eg under road flyovers.
[1] As someone who last went on a skateboard 28 years ago and fell off enough times that I decided a bike was 'safer', I couldn't tell you any more details.
10(ish) months on, one of them is still in good working order. One is rusted badly enough that, after a friend and I opened it so that he could get his trike through, we were unable to close it again.
Typical idiocy - thousands of pounds spent on heavy metalwork. Note the shiny chain on the main gate. What's to stop chav and his mates taking a boltcutter to that?
BTW, the barriers have now been removed following an article in the local paper about children in pushchairs being denied access to parks. They lasted about a year. Nice to know my council tax is being well spent.
Right on. Here's an idea which just came to my mind. The problem is youths on motorbikes roaring around paths which are there for walkers, cyclists, dog walkers, children in prams... They are neither taxed nor insured (and even if they were insured on the road it would be null-and-void I bet on a cycle track). Half the time they are probably stolen anyway. How about every time there is a 'loony cyclists on the road/pavement' letter we reply about the 'motorbike menace'. Just an example of prejudices - no-one gets in a lather about off-road bikes in the Daily Mail.
Sheffield. I wasn't going to embarrass them, but...well, I shall.
Shame. I'd like to hope that Edinburgh council could learn from other's mistakes, but as I left, they were in the planning stages for a similar project to get those naster BMXers and skater types out of Bristo Square (Where if we're perfectly honest, they do little harm) and move them well out of the centre of town into a far corner of a park.
Little harm?
It would be a truly tedious place to go and eat your sandwiches if there were no BMXers there. -- Ambrose
On 16 Feb 2006 12:58:49 -0800 someone who may be "Jon is Away!" <[email hidden]> wrote this:-
Quoted message said:
Shame. I'd like to hope that Edinburgh council could learn from other's mistakes, but as I left, they were in the planning stages for a similar project to get those naster BMXers and skater types out of Bristo Square (Where if we're perfectly honest, they do little harm) and move them well out of the centre of town into a far corner of a park.
To be fair to the City of Edinburgh Council, they worked with the skateboarders to develop a plan for a skateboard park in the Meadows. This was well developed when the NIMBYs stuck an oar in.
The current plan was supposed to be a quicker fix than sorting out the supposed legal problems with the Meadows.