Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Negative press

Started by Dave Harney · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,373 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
10 September 2003
Last activity
16 September 2003
Original author
Dave Harney
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,373
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved trail
    that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very infrequent
    car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any suggestions?

    ----------------------------------------------------------
    September 4, 2003 article in the News Graphic "Ozaukee County's Newspaper since 1883"

    Trail cyclists continue to ignore signs.

    Grant might ease problem by taking part of trail off-road.

    By Chris Mier, News Graphic Staff

    Grafton - They say they do it for the exercise, but some bicyclists still fail to heed local stop
    signs - even after a 14-year-old Cedarburg boy was hit by a car three weeks ago after peddling
    across Western Avenue without stopping.

    Surprisingly, though, the problem pertains more to Lycra-clad race-style bikers than defiant
    teenagers.

    Town Chairman Lester Bartel said he's heard of three cars swerving into the ditch to avoid careless
    cyclists exiting the Interurban Trail onto the intersection of Terminal and East River roads.

    Bartel lives on East River Road and said he has sat out at the intersection outlet counting the
    number of bikers plowing into the road with stopping. Four of 15 cyclists rode into the road without
    stopping, or even looking to see if any cars are coming Bartel said.

    "They're always the same people doing it," Bartel said. "They're the guys in the spandex pants and
    the funny shoes that want to look like Lance Armstrong. It's not the casual bikers. By and large the
    majority of the people are really good. It's the people trying to see how many thousand miles they
    can get in the next 20 minutes. They must think they're up north on some endless rail line, but
    they're not."

    The town recently decided to lower the speed limit along East River Road from unmarked to 35 mph,
    partially in response to the dangerous cyclists.

    Bartel said the problem cyclists are not just ignoring the signs on the trail, but even the stop
    signs on the roads.

    "There are trucks that go down that road," Bartel said, "and a dump truck isn't going to stop, it
    can't, and that nobody's been hit is beyond me. It' s asinine."

    The problems with renegade racers doesn't stop there either.

    Lt. Cory McCormick of the Ozaukee County Sheriff's Office said every spring he issues standard
    warnings to a couple of bicycling clubs who take Highway C to Lake Shore Road and up to Port
    Washington, regularly garnering complaints from motorists for ignoring stop signs and other rude
    biker behaviors.

    The groups typically drive their bikes here from Milwaukee and start their ride in Mequon,
    McCormick said.

    "We've had numerous complaints that they take the whole road up and they don 't obey signals and so
    forth," McCormich said. "This has been an ongoing issue for several years with us, so as soon as we
    get the first complaint of the year, we'll make contact with the clubs immediately when they come up
    and let them know any complaints will result in citations."

    There haven't been any citations issued so far, McCormick said, mainly because the warnings have
    worked, but also because it's nearly impossible to ticket a cyclist unless a violation is observed
    by a deputy.

    McCormick also said the Sheriff's Department would increase its patrols along Terminal and East
    River Roads if it begins receiving complaints from residents or the county.

    County Planner Andrew Struck said he hasn't received any formal complaints about bicyclists
    neglecting the stop signs at the Terminal and East River roads intersection, but said he has
    observed infractions himself and is aware of the general dangers posed by that stretch of the trail.

    The county has applied for two state grants to bring the trail off the road at that stretch in the
    town of Grafton and in another in Port Washington, and Struck said preliminary indications are
    favorable for the first grant.

    The grant, combined with a 20 percent county match, would pay for the trail to be taken off-road at
    the midpoint along terminal between East River Road and Highway W. It would continue over I-43 to
    where it picks up as an off-road trail now.

    Even if the plan is carried out, however, the intersection where the trail lets out onto Terminal
    Road would remain largely unchanged.

    Struck will field questions from the Grafton Town Board next Wednesday regarding possible
    enforcement actions against problematic cyclists.

    ------------------------------------

  2. "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved trail
    that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very
    infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  3. The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic laws. This Town Chairman is
    providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our lives everyday. All of
    us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade" category. Currently, in
    Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using public roads. These types of
    news stories are usually encouraged by groups that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for
    motorists. They would like to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong advocate of doing just that.
    This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and motorist sharing the
    same roads. What is needed at the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for
    motorists to slow down and some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is the
    one of raising awareness about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny
    shoes. I'd like to see a healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in a
    dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very
    infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  4. I've been on both sides of this issue. Where I've almost gotten hit by cars but, I've almost hit a
    bicyclist that ran a stop sign. He was lucky that there wasn't a car coming the other way on this
    country road as that was the only direction I could go without hitting him. He came out when I was 2
    car lengths or less away from the intersection doing the posted speed limit of 45 mph. I have also
    seen it where the driver's of the cars were at fault. Boils down to, obey the law. If you stop, you
    more and likely won't get hit but, if you run the stop sign or stop light (when red) and you get hit
    whether that be by car or bike, your at fault. Unfortunately, whoever is on the bike is usually the
    one that really pays for it.

    Dave Harney said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic laws. This Town Chairman is
    providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our lives everyday. All
    of us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade" category. Currently, in
    Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using public roads. These types
    of news stories are usually encouraged by groups that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for
    motorists. They would like to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong advocate of doing just that.
    This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and motorist sharing the
    same roads. What is needed at the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for
    motorists to slow down and some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is
    the one of raising awareness about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny
    shoes. I'd like to see a healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in
    a dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very
    infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  5. "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic laws. This Town Chairman is
    providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our lives everyday. All
    of us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade" category. Currently, in
    Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using public roads. These types
    of news stories are usually encouraged by groups that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for
    motorists. They would like to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong advocate of doing just that.
    This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and motorist sharing the
    same roads. What is needed at the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for
    motorists to slow down and some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is
    the one of raising awareness about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny
    shoes. I'd like to see a healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in
    a dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very
    infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

    Well that's YOUR point. THEIR point seems to be that a percentage of bikers are blowing the stop
    signs and causing problems with near misses. Near misses that are much liklier to kill the biker
    than they are the driver. I'm not sure that the most important thing is raising awareness, vs
    surviving the intersection.

  6. I think your reply is pretty eloquent. Why not make it a "Letter to the Editor" of some local news
    papers. It's amazing how rampant bigotry can get. It's been my experience the most cyclists are a
    hell of alot more courteous to others than most auto drivers, not matter what kind of shoes they
    each wear. "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic


    laws.

    Quoted message said:

    This Town Chairman is providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our
    lives everyday. All of us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade"
    category. Currently, in Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using
    public roads. These types of news stories are usually encouraged by


    groups

    Quoted message said:

    that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for motorists. They would


    like

    Quoted message said:

    to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong


    advocate

    Quoted message said:

    of doing just that. This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and
    motorist sharing the same roads. What is needed


    at

    Quoted message said:

    the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for motorists to slow down and
    some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is the one of raising awareness
    about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny shoes. I'd like to see a
    healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in a dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have
    very infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  7. "pjclarkesq" skrev...

    Quoted message said:

    I think your reply is pretty eloquent. Why not make it a "Letter to the Editor" of some local news
    papers. It's amazing how rampant bigotry can get. It's been my experience the most cyclists are a
    hell of alot more courteous to others than most auto drivers, not matter what kind of shoes they
    each wear.

    Well cardrivers always rag on bicycles and pedestrians. Pedestrians complain about cars and
    bicycles... etc.

    That being said I see a lot of bicycles blowing red lights (in Copenhagen) and violating other
    trafficlaws. A large part of them are either bike messengers or people out excercising (as in lycra
    and roadbike/MTB.) But these are probably a lost cause anyway no matter how many new restrictions
    the council comes up with. It wont deter them.

    cheers Mikael

  8. "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic


    laws.

    Quoted message said:

    This Town Chairman is providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our
    lives everyday. All of us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade"
    category. Currently, in Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using
    public roads. These types of news stories are usually encouraged by


    groups

    Quoted message said:

    that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for motorists. They would


    like

    Quoted message said:

    to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    I don't know a single state where a bicycle isn't considered a valid vehicle on a public road

    Quoted message said:

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong


    advocate

    Quoted message said:

    of doing just that. This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and
    motorist sharing the same roads. What is needed


    at

    Quoted message said:

    the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for motorists to slow down and
    some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is the one of raising awareness
    about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny shoes. I'd like to see a
    healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in a dubious situation.

    None of those suggestions gets to the guts of the problem which is a few bikers are violating the
    law, instead of better signs and clearing brush I'd think a traffic cop at those intersections
    giving out tickets would cure the problem rather quickly

    Quoted message said:

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have
    very infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  9. Dave Harney said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic laws. This Town Chairman is
    providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our lives everyday. All of
    us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade" category. Currently, in
    Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using public roads. These types
    of news stories are usually encouraged by groups that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for
    motorists. They would like to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong advocate of doing just that.
    This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and motorist sharing the
    same roads. What is needed at the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for
    motorists to slow down and some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is
    the one of raising awareness about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny
    shoes. I'd like to see a healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in a
    dubious situation.

    Maybe you can get some meber of your club (preferably retired - time consuming) to sit besides the
    ominous crossing and do a real count of the bikers and their behaviour. So you have some numbers
    for yourself together with a witness. BEst thing would be to do it for at least a whole week so you
    can check for different behavior on weekends etc. My dad-in-law did this and it provided us with a
    lot of ammo.

    Greetings

  10. I am a staunch advocate of cyclists observing traffic laws and I would suggest trying to present
    compelling evidence that would encourage law enforcement to monitor the area that you are referring
    to and encourage them to ticket the offending cyclists.

    Lewis.

    ***************************

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved trail
    that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have very
    infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any suggestions?

    ----------------------------------------------------------
    September 4, 2003 article in the News Graphic "Ozaukee County's Newspaper since 1883"

    Trail cyclists continue to ignore signs.

    Grant might ease problem by taking part of trail off-road.

    By Chris Mier, News Graphic Staff

    Grafton - They say they do it for the exercise, but some bicyclists still fail to heed local stop
    signs - even after a 14-year-old Cedarburg boy was hit by a car three weeks ago after peddling
    across Western Avenue without stopping.

    Surprisingly, though, the problem pertains more to Lycra-clad race-style bikers than defiant
    teenagers.

    Town Chairman Lester Bartel said he's heard of three cars swerving into the ditch to avoid
    careless cyclists exiting the Interurban Trail onto the intersection of Terminal and East
    River roads.

    Bartel lives on East River Road and said he has sat out at the intersection outlet counting the
    number of bikers plowing into the road with stopping. Four of 15 cyclists rode into the road
    without stopping, or even looking to see if any cars are coming Bartel said.

    "They're always the same people doing it," Bartel said. "They're the guys in the spandex pants and
    the funny shoes that want to look like Lance Armstrong. It's not the casual bikers. By and large
    the majority of the people are really good. It's the people trying to see how many thousand miles
    they can get in the next 20 minutes. They must think they're up north on some endless rail line,
    but they're not."

    The town recently decided to lower the speed limit along East River Road from unmarked to 35 mph,
    partially in response to the dangerous cyclists.

    Bartel said the problem cyclists are not just ignoring the signs on the trail, but even the stop
    signs on the roads.

    "There are trucks that go down that road," Bartel said, "and a dump truck isn't going to stop, it
    can't, and that nobody's been hit is beyond me. It' s asinine."

    The problems with renegade racers doesn't stop there either.

    Lt. Cory McCormick of the Ozaukee County Sheriff's Office said every spring he issues standard
    warnings to a couple of bicycling clubs who take Highway C to Lake Shore Road and up to Port
    Washington, regularly garnering complaints from motorists for ignoring stop signs and other
    rude biker behaviors.

    The groups typically drive their bikes here from Milwaukee and start their ride in Mequon,
    McCormick said.

    "We've had numerous complaints that they take the whole road up and they don 't obey signals and
    so forth," McCormich said. "This has been an ongoing issue for several years with us, so as soon
    as we get the first complaint of the year, we'll make contact with the clubs immediately when they
    come up and let them know any complaints will result in citations."

    There haven't been any citations issued so far, McCormick said, mainly because the warnings have
    worked, but also because it's nearly impossible to ticket a cyclist unless a violation is observed
    by a deputy.

    McCormick also said the Sheriff's Department would increase its patrols along Terminal and East
    River Roads if it begins receiving complaints from residents or the county.

    County Planner Andrew Struck said he hasn't received any formal complaints about bicyclists
    neglecting the stop signs at the Terminal and East River roads intersection, but said he has
    observed infractions himself and is aware of the general dangers posed by that stretch of
    the trail.

    The county has applied for two state grants to bring the trail off the road at that stretch in the
    town of Grafton and in another in Port Washington, and Struck said preliminary indications are
    favorable for the first grant.

    The grant, combined with a 20 percent county match, would pay for the trail to be taken off-road
    at the midpoint along terminal between East River Road and Highway W. It would continue over I-43
    to where it picks up as an off-road trail now.

    Even if the plan is carried out, however, the intersection where the trail lets out onto Terminal
    Road would remain largely unchanged.

    Struck will field questions from the Grafton Town Board next Wednesday regarding possible
    enforcement actions against problematic cyclists.

    ------------------------------------

  11. Even handed enforcement of existing law? There are more motorists running stops and creating a
    greater hazard than cyclists. Do they complain so of their own failings? I think not.

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved trail
    that reverts to public roads for a short


    distance.

    Quoted message said:

    The public roads in question have very infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going
    to the board meeting - any suggestions?

  12. Is there any way the meeting of the trail and the road could be redesigned so that the trail merged with the road, (like an entrance ramp) rather than coming to a T? Lots of times you have a trail coming up parrallel next to a road and then the trail does a 90 degree turn to T intersect with the road. I suppose that makes sense if half the cyclists are turning one way and half the other at the road, but this sounds like most would continue in one direction on the road to pick up the trail again later. In that case, a merge intersection might be better.

    John Riley

  13. We should all be staunch advocates of this. What I've noticed in my job driving my taxicab around
    Fort Lauderdale is that the folks in their fancy clothes and on expensive bikes do obey the law,
    while those who are pedaling as a result of a DUI, are on the wrong side of the road, or on the
    sidewalk, and seem to be staring me down as I approach them, daring me to hit them, and they never
    have lights at night.
    --

    Joel Wilson Fort Lauderdale
    =========================================
    Proud 2 B a pioneering satellite radio subscriber AI4I is always on the trailing edge of technology
    =========================================
    "Lewis Campbell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I am a staunch advocate of cyclists observing traffic laws and I would suggest trying to present
    compelling evidence that would encourage law enforcement to monitor the area that you are
    referring to and encourage them to ticket the offending cyclists.

    Lewis.

    ***************************

  14. Here in Finland they showed similar things on tv about an intersection with a stopsign for cyclists.
    The funny thing was that there is only one or two intersections with stopsign for cyclists in the
    whole 1 million people city area... makes you wonder why it was picked as example.

  15. Here in Massachusetts USA no one seems to stop at stop signs. That bicyclist who is running the stop
    sign on the bike is also doing it in a car.

    Solution obey the traffic laws period.

    "Markku Poysti" <[email hidden]_nospam> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Here in Finland they showed similar things on tv about an intersection with a stopsign for
    cyclists. The funny thing was that there is only one or two intersections with stopsign for
    cyclists in the whole 1 million people city area... makes you wonder why it was picked as example.

  16. So, how was the meeting?

    JV

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic


    laws.

    Quoted message said:

    This Town Chairman is providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger our
    lives everyday. All of us who wear Lycra have been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade"
    category. Currently, in Wisconsin, bicycles are consider valid vehicles under the law for using
    public roads. These types of news stories are usually encouraged by


    groups

    Quoted message said:

    that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for motorists. They would


    like

    Quoted message said:

    to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong


    advocate

    Quoted message said:

    of doing just that. This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and
    motorist sharing the same roads. What is needed


    at

    Quoted message said:

    the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for motorists to slow down and
    some brush cleared for better visibility. The more important issue is the one of raising awareness
    about cycles as valid users of public roads - even if they wear funny shoes. I'd like to see a
    healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in a dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This is all about a nice paved
    trail that reverts to public roads for a short distance. The public roads in question have
    very infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any
    suggestions?

    Obey the traffic laws?

  17. I think it went fairly well. Besides the town board, the county and sheriff's office reps were
    there. I spoke at some length about the issue. The chairman insisted he was misquoted and did not
    intend to target people like me in his law enforcement campaign. I suspect that my comments and
    another biker's "letter to the editor" were educational for the town board. Actually, the county
    folks seemed to understand the issues much better than the town or sheriff folks. All-in-all, I'm
    glad I spoke up as a number of people approached me after the meeting and voiced agreement with
    my remarks.

    "Jim Verheul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    So, how was the meeting?

    JV

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The point is that most of us that wear funny shoes do obey the traffic


    laws.

    Quoted message said:

    This Town Chairman is providing moral justification to the bike-hostile motorists who endanger
    our lives everyday. All of us who wear Lycra


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    been lumped into a law-breaker or "renegade" category. Currently, in Wisconsin, bicycles are
    consider valid vehicles under the law for using public roads. These types of news stories are
    usually encouraged by


    groups

    Quoted message said:

    that view cyclists as a mere nuisance factor for motorists. They would


    like

    Quoted message said:

    to change the law to get bikes off the roads.

    Certainly, we should all obey traffic laws and our club is a strong


    advocate

    Quoted message said:

    of doing just that. This type of article does little to promote overall safety for cyclists and
    motorist sharing the same roads. What is needed


    at

    Quoted message said:

    the intersection in question in the article is some better signs for motorists to slow down and
    some brush cleared for better visibility.


    The

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    more important issue is the one of raising awareness about cycles as


    valid

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    users of public roads - even if they wear funny shoes. I'd like to see


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    healthy problem solving attitude instead of just more law enforcement in


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    dubious situation.

    "MLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Dave Harney" <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    > Read the article - I'm sure you will be amused (and [censored]). This


    is

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > all about a nice paved trail that reverts to public roads for a


    short

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > distance. The public roads in question have very infrequent car traffic - maybe a couple an
    > hour. I'm going to the board meeting - any suggestions?
    >

    Obey the traffic laws?



Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.