Per Chris Glidden:
Quoted message said:True, but why have a mountain bike if you aren't going to mountain bike?
There's "mountain biking" and there's "mountain biking".
I've got a mountain bike, but I don't think any serious MTBer would call me a
mountain biker. I'm really just somebody that likes to ride a bike but
doesn't like to do it around motor vehicles.
I'd say that 98% of my miles are on paved surfaces, fire roads, or smooth
single track - and probably could be ridden on the average road bike with 28mm
tires and a cyclocross tread on the front wheel.
It's the other 2 percent that makes the MTB more functional. Jumping concrete
curbs, hopping over the occasional small tree, going down stairs, plowing
through wet leaves/mud, crossing a field with no path, and so-forth.
I have a hard tail and an FS - and the FS gets the nod for all except what I
call "road" rides (including the ride to where I'm currently working).
Every so often - especially when I'm maxed out on a paved surface and some
roadie just sort of floats past me - I get the urge for a road bike. But then I
realize that the roadie is just in vastly better shape than I am and a road bike
would get me a couple mph more absolute max.
The MTBs are just vastly more comfortable, they're more durable, the parts are
interchangeable, and the reduced speed doesn't matter because I don't have to
keep up with anybody.
Besides, riding the hard tail to work on HP slicks takes about an hour - average
speed around 13 mph including stops. On a road bike, I'd gain 2 mph absolute
max - and getting there five minutes faster wouldn't make any diff to me.
--
PeteCresswell