General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Hip-Belt Squat

Started by The Crow · · Last activity · 5 posts · 737 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 January 2006
Last activity
25 January 2006
Original author
The Crow
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
737
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is this an entirely useless variation? Surely you couldn't manneuver large
    weight - squatting levels of weight - around with you on a hip-belt? Maybe
    it's okay if you're a bit of a beginner, and thus the weights are relatively
    light.

  2. The Crow said:

    Is this an entirely useless variation? Surely you couldn't manneuver large
    weight - squatting levels of weight - around with you on a hip-belt? Maybe
    it's okay if you're a bit of a beginner, and thus the weights are relatively
    light.

    It's useful for people with spinal problems and/or shoulder issues who
    cannot hold a bar in the normal squat position. Are you sure you know
    the difference between a "dip belt" and a "hip belt"?

  3. "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    The Crow said:

    Is this an entirely useless variation? Surely you couldn't manneuver
    large
    weight - squatting levels of weight - around with you on a hip-belt?
    Maybe
    it's okay if you're a bit of a beginner, and thus the weights are
    relatively
    light.

    It's useful for people with spinal problems and/or shoulder issues who
    cannot hold a bar in the normal squat position. Are you sure you know
    the difference between a "dip belt" and a "hip belt"?

    Who was that author/gym owner/guru from Canada?? The name slips my mind.

    He had the slickest hip belt setup I ever saw. Those guys moved awesome
    amounts of weight on it too.

    He did them on a platform. The weights were located at least three or four
    feet below the platform. The chain from the hip belt went through a hole in
    the platform. A steel beam ran vertically through this whole setup. On the
    steel beam was a set of handles that ran up and down the beam on some
    industrial rollers.

    These handles allowed the trainees to keep their balance while doing the hip
    squats. Often a fellow trainee would provide assistance at the bottom of
    the movement so they could even lift more weight.

    Not for sissies. These guys lifted far more weight in this movement than
    they did in the conventional back squat.

  4. "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    The Crow said:

    Is this an entirely useless variation? Surely you couldn't manneuver
    large
    weight - squatting levels of weight - around with you on a hip-belt?
    Maybe
    it's okay if you're a bit of a beginner, and thus the weights are
    relatively
    light.

    It's useful for people with spinal problems and/or shoulder issues who
    cannot hold a bar in the normal squat position. Are you sure you know
    the difference between a "dip belt" and a "hip belt"?

    No. Good point.

  5. "The Crow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Is this an entirely useless variation? Surely you couldn't manneuver
    large weight - squatting levels of weight - around with you on a
    hip-belt? Maybe it's okay if you're a bit of a beginner, and thus the
    weights are relatively light.

    One recent IronMind catalogue had a picture of a WSM winner doing
    these - get up on boxes, use a loading pin, and you can handle a ton of
    weight this way. A hip belt and a dipping belt aren't terribly
    different in concept. Here's IronMind's, rated to 3,500 lbs:

    http://www6.mailordercentral.com/ironmind/prodinfo.asp?number=1220

    It'll set you back $95 plus shipping, but I imagine you can trust it to
    handle the weight. 🙂

    -S-
    http://www.kbnj.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.