Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Difference between Grasshopper and SMGT(e)???

Started by NYC XYZ · · Last activity · 9 posts · 621 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
16 January 2006
Last activity
17 January 2006
Original author
NYC XYZ
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
621
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi, All:

    Why is the Grasshopper cheaper despite being lighter than the SMGT(e)?

    It shares the same features and options -- full-suspension, Bodylink
    seating, USS/OSS -- except for being 20/20.

    How do they perform? They even look the same, really!

    TIA!

  2. NYC XYZ said:

    Why is the Grasshopper cheaper despite being lighter than the SMGT(e)?

    In the UK list prices all three cost the same (£1425 for the basic
    complete bike with V brakes).

    Quoted message said:

    How do they perform? They even look the same, really!

    I found the Streetamchine to give a slightly more refined feeling ride,
    the GH is a bit sportier. I think it's more riding position than
    anything else (GH is sort of half way between a StM and a SpM). The
    lowrider racks on the GH are further back (have to be with the lower
    seat) so it won't take really heavy loads so well, but that's only an
    issue if you'll be carrying heavy loads.

    As usual, the advice is try them out and see for yourself. I've come
    across people who prefer the GH, I prefer the StM. Mileage varies. On
    paper, the GH was the ideal bike for Roos, but she chose a Nazca Fiero
    instead after riding both (she started 'bent riding on my StM and though
    she thinks it's okay, not okay enough to want one herself). Don't think
    Nazca have a US importer though...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Thanks again for the input, Peter!

    Man, looks like you Europeans have got it together.

    I'm still shocked that not one shop in NYC does 'bents as a regular
    part of their inventory!!!

    Peter Clinch said:
    NYC XYZ said:

    Why is the Grasshopper cheaper despite being lighter than the SMGT(e)?

    In the UK list prices all three cost the same (£1425 for the basic
    complete bike with V brakes).

    Quoted message said:

    How do they perform? They even look the same, really!

    I found the Streetamchine to give a slightly more refined feeling ride,
    the GH is a bit sportier. I think it's more riding position than
    anything else (GH is sort of half way between a StM and a SpM). The
    lowrider racks on the GH are further back (have to be with the lower
    seat) so it won't take really heavy loads so well, but that's only an
    issue if you'll be carrying heavy loads.

    As usual, the advice is try them out and see for yourself. I've come
    across people who prefer the GH, I prefer the StM. Mileage varies. On
    paper, the GH was the ideal bike for Roos, but she chose a Nazca Fiero
    instead after riding both (she started 'bent riding on my StM and though
    she thinks it's okay, not okay enough to want one herself). Don't think
    Nazca have a US importer though...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. NYC XYZ said:

    Thanks again for the input, Peter!

    Man, looks like you Europeans have got it together.

    I'm still shocked that not one shop in NYC does 'bents as a regular
    part of their inventory!!!

    Well, beyond one or two models, I mean (though even then, this is just
    a handful of shops in a city of millions).

  5. NYC XYZ said:

    Man, looks like you Europeans have got it together.

    I'm still shocked that not one shop in NYC does 'bents as a regular
    part of their inventory!!!

    Up to a point. I only have to travel 80 miles to get to a 'bentmonger...

    There are 6 'bent shops plus another 3 "by appointment" dealers in the
    UK that I know about, and Windcheetah, ICE and Burrows will probably
    deal direct. That's serving a population of ~60 million.

    It's easier in the NL, but even in "the land of bikes" it's unusual to
    see a 'bent or a 'bent dealer.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. "Peter Clinch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    NYC XYZ wrote:

    It's easier in the NL, but even in "the land of bikes" it's unusual to see
    a 'bent or a 'bent dealer.

    Very curious about that. You would think that someplace where bikes are used
    more for commutation and practical purposes and less as a "hobby" that they
    would gravitate to the more comfortable and less performance oriented
    vehicles. I would expect Rhoades Cars (or a European version of it) to be
    quite popular but I gather that isn't the case.

    I know that in Denmark the following are true (as of about 10 years ago)
    1. They don't make any cars
    2. There is a 100% import duty on cars.
    3. Bicycles are widely used as commuting and utility vehicles
    4. I saw very few (make that none) recumbents

    I would think they would be a huge hit there. While Leitra has sold about
    400 vehicles in over 20 years of production I'll bet a good percentage of
    them were for export.

    Still the Danish society is really well set up to accommodate bicycles. On
    my last trip there (I do miss getting to go there on a regular basis) I saw
    what I thought was the ultimate accommodation of a society for bicycles. I
    was in Copenhagen and I saw a woman with a bicycle. The bicycle had a basket
    in the front with a few bags of groceries. On the back of the bicycle was a
    child seat with a child. She was hailing a cab. I thought that this would be
    interesting. A cab stopped. The driver pulled a bike rack out of the trunk
    that inserted into two sockets on the rear of the car. He put the groceries
    in the trunk, the bike on the rack, and the people got in the cab. After he
    drove away I noticed that almost every cab had these same sockets. I can
    only assume that they also carried bike racks as well. If only NYC were like
    that.

    Jeff

  7. Jeff Grippe said:

    Very curious about that. You would think that someplace where bikes are used
    more for commutation and practical purposes and less as a "hobby" that they
    would gravitate to the more comfortable and less performance oriented
    vehicles.

    They do: the classic Dutch roadster is a fine example of a comfortable
    bike that isn't build for Whizz, with its bolt upright seating position
    leaving no weight on your arms but leaving plenty of scope for air
    resistance.

    If you take a not entirely atypical Dutch urban street it may well be
    filled with fairly narrow houses with little storage facilities for
    bikes, so lots of people leave bikes outside. Parking your bike at the
    station is often nearer a pile than a row, so it makes sense to have
    something you can leave out in the rain and not begrudge the odd
    scratch, and not mind /too/ much if it goes AWOL in an environment where
    bike thieves are far from uncommon. In such circumstances a steel
    roadster with a full chain case, one gear and one backpedal brake that's
    built like a tank and has no trouble taking your pal on the rear rack
    makes a lot of very good sense, especially as they can be had for very
    little money (especially the ones recycled by the thieves...).

    OTOH If you live out on the polders and are commuting 20km into a
    vicious headwind on a daily basis it's a different matter, and it's also
    no surprise that the home of the Dutch velomobile industry is out on the
    Flevoland polder. But more people live in Amsterdam than Flevoland, I
    think!

    While a recumbent bike makes an awful lot of sense in most of the NL
    while you're actually /riding/ it, it makes considerably less when it
    comes to park and store. If I lived in Amsterdam I'd probably have a
    roadster for general travel and a cargo bike for loads, and only if
    there was interior storage after that would I get a 'bent. And I'm
    already a convert!

    (I'd expressed similar surprise first time we visited Roos' old home
    town, and she pointed out all the ways a 'bent doesn't make much sense
    to many: last trip, just before Christmas, I did see one 'bent in The
    Hague, a Flevobike (parked outside in the street).)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  8. Peter Clinch said:
    Jeff Grippe said:

    Very curious about that. You would think that someplace where bikes are used
    more for commutation and practical purposes and less as a "hobby" that they
    would gravitate to the more comfortable and less performance oriented
    vehicles.

    They do: the classic Dutch roadster is a fine example of a comfortable
    bike that isn't build for Whizz, with its bolt upright seating position
    leaving no weight on your arms but leaving plenty of scope for air
    resistance....

    For a Dutch bike, I want a Challenge NME (see
    <http://www.challengebikes.com/html/index.php?taal=en> and scroll down
    a bit), 🙂

    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley (For a bit?)

  9. "Johnny Sunset" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Clinch said:
    Jeff Grippe said:

    Very curious about that. You would think that someplace where bikes are
    used
    more for commutation and practical purposes and less as a "hobby" that
    they
    would gravitate to the more comfortable and less performance oriented
    vehicles.

    They do: the classic Dutch roadster is a fine example of a comfortable
    bike that isn't build for Whizz, with its bolt upright seating position
    leaving no weight on your arms but leaving plenty of scope for air
    resistance....

    For a Dutch bike, I want a Challenge NME (see
    <http://www.challengebikes.com/html/index.php?taal=en> and scroll down
    a bit), 🙂

    I am with Jeff on this one - and Peter is right too, even though he is a
    Medical Physics IT Officer.

    It is time for Mr. Sherman to grow up and stop living in fantasy land. Low
    racers are for racing in velodromes, not for riding in the streets and on
    the highways of the real world. I urge Mr. Sherman to stop all this useless
    dreaming or he will go crazy from the frustration of it all. I urge on him
    the Ed Dolan solution to all of life's conundrums - despair!

    I grow old . I grow old .
    I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.

    T.S.Eliot - The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

    I should have been a pair of ragged claws
    Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.

    T.S.Eliot - The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.