Road Cycling · Public discussion

anonymity

Started by gym.gravity · · Last activity · 10 posts · 505 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 January 2006
Last activity
14 January 2006
Original author
gym.gravity
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
505
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70000-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_2

  2. On 12 Jan 2006 06:32:29 -0800, "gym.gravity" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70000-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_2

    Damn, I was hoping it was a photo of Greg Lemond racing in a masters
    race on a Merkcx, wearing a bag over his head. Oh, well, maybe next
    time.

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

  3. January 09, 2006
    Anonymous Internet Annoying Is Illegal in the U.S.

    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity.
    [...]

    Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
    called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
    harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
    disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

    This law will make it a Federal Offense for the likes of Roger Bratton
    to do what he does. It will take a little while for it to be put into
    effect but pretty soon Roger will find all of his ID's exposed by his
    ISP's BY LAW.

    At this point with PROOF of the identity of who is stalking, he then
    become liable for civil penalties and there are about 100 Aussies who
    will file suit in courts and Roger will become the target of his own
    devices.

  4. gym.gravity said:

    http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70000-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_2

    January 09, 2006
    Anonymous Internet Annoying Is Illegal in the U.S.

    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity.
    [...]

    Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
    called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
    harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
    disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

    This law will make it a Federal Offense for the likes of jackass Tom
    Kunich
    to do what he does. It will take a little while for it to be put into
    effect but pretty soon little tom will find all of his ID's exposed by
    his
    ISP's BY LAW.

    At this point with PROOF of the identity of who is stalking, he then
    become liable for civil penalties and there are about 100 Aussies who
    will file suit in courts and jackass little tom will become the target
    of his own
    devices.

  5. gym.gravity said:

    http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70000-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_2

    http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10498319/ .

    January 09, 2006
    Anonymous Internet Annoying Is Illegal in the U.S.

    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity.
    [...]

    Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
    called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
    harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
    disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

    This law will make it a Federal Offense for the likes of jackass Tom
    Kunich
    to do what he does. It will take a little while for it to be put into
    effect but pretty soon little tom will find all of his ID's exposed by
    his
    ISP's BY LAW.

    At this point with PROOF of the identity of who is stalking, he then
    become liable for civil penalties and there are about 100 Aussies who
    will file suit in courts and jackass little tom will become the target
    of his own devices. http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10498319/

  6. This is even RICHER! There is a maximum penalty of TWO YEARS in Federal
    Prsion. Anyone here wonder what would happen to Roger in a Federal Prison?

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    January 09, 2006
    Anonymous Internet Annoying Is Illegal in the U.S.

    Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting
    annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without
    disclosing your true identity.
    [...]

    Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit
    called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone
    harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without
    disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

    This law will make it a Federal Offense for the likes of Roger Bratton
    to do what he does. It will take a little while for it to be put into
    effect but pretty soon Roger will find all of his ID's exposed by his
    ISP's BY LAW.

    At this point with PROOF of the identity of who is stalking, he then
    become liable for civil penalties and there are about 100 Aussies who
    will file suit in courts and Roger will become the target of his own
    devices.

  7. Tom Kunich said:

    This is even RICHER! There is a maximum penalty of TWO YEARS in Federal
    Prsion. Anyone here wonder what would happen to

    little 2" Tom boy
    This is even RICHER! There is a maximum penalty of TWO YEARS in Federal

    Prsion. Anyone here wonder what would happen to Tom in a Federal
    Prison?
    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/browse_thread/thread/219c1afa0ffe9b77/299243856d564671?lnk=st&q=&rnum=2#299243856d564671

  8. If you don't like what Tom posts add him to your "blocked sender" list, like
    I just did to you!

    PLONK

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    This is even RICHER! There is a maximum penalty of TWO YEARS in Federal
    Prsion. Anyone here wonder what would happen to

    little 2" Tom boy
    This is even RICHER! There is a maximum penalty of TWO YEARS in Federal

    Prsion. Anyone here wonder what would happen to Tom in a Federal
    Prison?
    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/browse_thread/thread/219c1afa0ffe9b77/299243856d564671?lnk=st&q=&rnum=2#299243856d564671

  9. Dashi said:

    If you don't like what Tom posts add him to your "blocked sender" list, like
    I just did to you!

    PLONK

    Wow, you showed him.

  10. Kyle Legate said:
    Dashi said:

    If you don't like what Tom posts add him to your "blocked sender" list, like
    I just did to you!

    PLONK

    Wow, you showed him.

    i would like to show her my overcrocking not overclocking

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.