Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Happy New Year

Started by Jim · · Last activity · 6 posts · 522 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
1 January 2006
Last activity
2 January 2006
Original author
Jim
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
522
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Best wishes and good health to you all, albeit that my only be 5 or 6 people
    now. Not including the crossposters of course.

    I for one hope that the group doesn't completely die off although I am
    afraid Ed may be correct. Both Ed and Tom's posts are frequently educational
    and entertaining and are the only reason I check in here anymore.

    Jim C

  2. "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:2yFtf.51526$oG.32381@dukeread02...

    Quoted message said:

    Best wishes and good health to you all, albeit that my only be 5 or 6
    people now. Not including the crossposters of course.

    I for one hope that the group doesn't completely die off although I am
    afraid Ed may be correct. Both Ed and Tom's posts are frequently
    educational and entertaining and are the only reason I check in here
    anymore.

    Jim C

    Jim, I think the group has now been reduced to about less than 10 of us. I
    do not count the Chicagoland [censored] or these confounded cross-posters. It
    is too bad what has happened to this group. It all began with Ed Gin last
    winter. He is a criminal vandal troll and he murdered this group. Only Mr.
    McNamara, myself and a few others protested. Mr. Sherman said nothing. His
    silence was deafening!

    The topic these days is all about housekeeping and nothing but. No group can
    long survive when that is what it has been reduced to. Newbies are the
    lifeblood of any newsgroup as they energize the rest of us. No newbies will
    come here as long as the Chicagoland [censored] are posting their spamming
    [censored].

    By the way, Mr. Sherman is excellent with newbies and I do commend him for
    that. I do not bother much with newbies. I am a side dish here, a sort of
    clown and jester. I mean to keep the group lively and that is about it for
    me. Mr. Sherman is a responder like I am, but he is on topic whereas I tend
    not to be. But even Mr. Sherman cannot keep this group alive all by himself.
    We need to have newbies coming here or else we are dead.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  3. Jim & Ed,

    You both know very well why people vacated ARBR. Perhaps those that
    did exercised some good old fashion common sense when they finally had
    enough. ARBR is not the world. No one on their death be will ever
    utter these words ... Gee I wish I spent more time at ARBR. ARBR is
    not the newsgroup it once was and may never recover from the Johnny
    NoCom and HRS blog refuse. Unfortunately. Usenet is an unmoderated
    arena where a few can ruin thingy for the many and those few are
    cross-posting their HRS SPAM to many a website unrelated to cycling and
    their spamming is not even confined to the borders of the country in
    which they live. It would be nice if the mothers of the impudent
    toddlers, would suspend their computer privileges. Where's a
    net-nanny when you need one?

    JimmyMac

  4. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    [...]
    Where's a

    Quoted message said:

    net-nanny when you need one?

    Jon Meinecke got disgusted with the lot of us and left I can only assume for
    greener pastures elsewhere. He was not bad in this regard, although he was
    too greatly in favor of the kill file as a solution to what ails us. The
    kill file is for ostriches, a very mysterious bird indeed. Most of us will
    want to know what is being said either to us or about us.

    Mr. Sherman to his credit has never been much of a net-nanny. I am more of a
    one than he is, but I am not like Jon Meinecke. He tried to be constructive
    whereas I lose all patience and am probably more destructive than is good
    for the group when it comes to dealing with scofflaws.

    But a net-nanny will only work against those who have some good will. It
    will not work against those who are malicious and who mean to take down a
    newsgroup. Much sterner measures are called for when dealing with such
    criminals.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  5. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Mr. Sherman to his credit has never been much of a net-nanny. I am more of


    a

    Quoted message said:

    one than he is, but I am not like Jon Meinecke. He tried to be


    constructive

    Quoted message said:

    whereas I lose all patience and am probably more destructive than is good
    for the group when it comes to dealing with scofflaws.

    You are in serious denial

  6. "Mark Leuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Mr. Sherman to his credit has never been much of a net-nanny. I am more
    of


    a

    Quoted message said:

    one than he is, but I am not like Jon Meinecke. He tried to be


    constructive

    Quoted message said:

    whereas I lose all patience and am probably more destructive than is good
    for the group when it comes to dealing with scofflaws.

    You are in serious denial

    Here is how Mr. Leuck should have written his one liner:

    You are in serious denial.

    Note the period at the end of the sentence.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.