General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Who wants to know.......

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 10 posts · 267 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2005
Last activity
1 January 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
267
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Angus Macmillan
    www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
    www.killhunting.org
    www.con-servation.org.uk

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, amacmil304
    @aol.com says...

    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Paul Rooney's lies? His stolen OS maps? Do tell.
    --
    Craig Oldfield

  3. Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:56:41 +0000
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.

    --
    I am not young enough to know everything.
    {Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)}

  4. Bootlaces said:

    Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:56:41 +0000
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.


    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/forum/default.asp

    --
    Steve Watson

  5. Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed steve watson <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:09:19 GMT
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Bootlaces said:

    Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:56:41 +0000
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.


    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/forum/default.asp

    That looks like a _web_ forum to me ;-)

    --
    Avoid alliteration. Always.

  6. On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:11:54 +0000, Bootlaces <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed steve watson <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:09:19 GMT
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Bootlaces said:

    Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:56:41 +0000
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    > Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    > their internet forum?

    Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.


    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/forum/default.asp

    That looks like a _web_ forum to me ;-)

    Ah, that'd be different from the internet then?
    --

    Paul Rooney

  7. Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed Paul Rooney <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:20:59 +0000
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:11:54 +0000, Bootlaces <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    I noticed steve watson <[email hidden]>
    had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:09:19 GMT
    in <news:[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Bootlaces wrote:
    > Whilst ambling through uk.rec.walking
    > I noticed <[email hidden]>
    > had opined on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:56:41 +0000
    > in <news:[email hidden]>:
    >
    >> Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    >> their internet forum?
    >
    > Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.
    >
    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/forum/default.asp

    That looks like a _web_ forum to me ;-)

    Ah, that'd be different from the internet then?

    It could be. But it doesn't have to be.

    --
    I am in a duel to death with this wallpaper. One of us has to go.
    {Oscar Wilde}

  8. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Being totally pedantic, I don't think they have an internet forum.
    >
    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/forum/default.asp

    That looks like a _web_ forum to me ;-)

    Ah, that'd be different from the internet then?


    Not all of the Internet is on the world wide web, whereas all the world
    wide web is on the Internet. So, yes because as part of the web it is
    also part of the Internet, but no because it is only accessible from
    that part of the Internet which is also part of the web. I think.

    HTH.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  9. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Proper rambling to enjoy the countryside and admire the scenery.

    My (limited) experience of the RA is that they have to cover X miles per day
    without taking any notice of the beautiful country they are walking through,
    just the heels of the person in front.

    If you are on one of their walks and you stop to enjoy the views, when you
    look round you will find yourself on your own, and the leaders do not seem
    to care how many people they lose!

    Alan

    Quoted message said:

    Angus Macmillan
    www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
    www.killhunting.org
    www.con-servation.org.uk

  10. Alan Holmes said:
    Quoted message said:

    Who wants to know what the Ramblers Association couldn't cope with on
    their internet forum?

    Proper rambling to enjoy the countryside and admire the scenery.

    My (limited) experience of the RA is that they have to cover X miles per day
    without taking any notice of the beautiful country they are walking through,
    just the heels of the person in front.

    If you are on one of their walks and you stop to enjoy the views, when you
    look round you will find yourself on your own, and the leaders do not seem
    to care how many people they lose!

    I walked, for the first time, with the RA a couple of weeks ago and I
    was surprised at how fast they walked. The leader did regularly check
    that we had not lost anyone, but I did not enjoy the walk in the same
    way that I would enjoy being out on my own as I was always worried
    that I'd be struggling at the back and would be abandoned! As a
    "fitness" walk it was perfect.

    They were nice people and we did have a couple of stops planned in,
    but the actual walking was much faster than I was comfortable with. I
    think we did about 13 miles and the terrain was only fairly hilly - so
    I don't think I will join them on any long or mountainous walks!

    Judith

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.