Emails

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>
>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the time.
>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly?
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>
>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>diabetic -
>>>I was helping him get info
>>
>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>
>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>that?
>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if you
>have the guts to do it,
>

That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)

Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game will
backfire again

He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
disadvantage.

There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.

Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

Let's just see what this stupid piece of [censored] is made of. Being made to look
stupid again I think will be punishment enough.

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>
>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the time.
>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly?
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>
>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>diabetic -
>>>I was helping him get info
>>
>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>
>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>that?
>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if you
>have the guts to do it,
>

That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)

Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game will
backfire again

He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
disadvantage.

There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.

Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

/
What would we do without this piece of [censored]? Who would we ridicule? (Lee is
not posting much these days).

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>
>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the time.
>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly?
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>
>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>diabetic -
>>>I was helping him get info
>>
>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>
>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>that?
>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if you
>have the guts to do it,
>

That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)

Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game will
backfire again

He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
disadvantage.

There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.

Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

I was thinking of a nice letter to the Courthouse in Wayne Country - make a
little presentation about things they should know about the Assistant
Prosecutor - maybe send it by fax along with a number of his posts - will
carefully select the bullying ones - which show the time line right through
his working day? Just an informattive letter so that they can understand how
the assistant prosecutor spends his time? Just to do a public service to the
community over there? JMW will learn from this not to joust with a person
who has resources.

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:45:53 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>>news:[email hidden]...
>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the time.
>>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Certainly?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>>
>>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>>diabetic -
>>>>I was helping him get info
>>>
>>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>>
>>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>>that?
>>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if you
>>have the guts to do it,
>>
>
> That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)

Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game will
backfire again

He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
disadvantage.

There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.

Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

I was thinking of a nice letter to the Courthouse in Wayne Country - make a
little presentation about things they should know about the Assistant
Prosecutor - maybe send it by fax along with a number of his posts - will
carefully select the bullying ones - which show the time line right through
his working day? Just an informattive letter so that they can understand how
the assistant prosecutor spends his time? Just to do a public service to the
community over there? JMW will learn from this not to joust with a person
who has resources.

He certainly deserves some sort of retaliation given what he is trying
to do to you, even if he has got his wires crossed again.

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:45:53 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>
>"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email hidden]...
>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the
>>>>>>>>>time.
>>>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Certainly?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>>>
>>>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>>>diabetic -
>>>>>I was helping him get info
>>>>
>>>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>>>
>>>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>>>that?
>>>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if
>>>you
>>>have the guts to do it,
>>>
>>
>> That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)
>
>Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
>'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
>effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game
>will
>backfire again
>

He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
disadvantage.

There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.

Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

I was thinking of a nice letter to the Courthouse in Wayne Country - make
a
little presentation about things they should know about the Assistant
Prosecutor - maybe send it by fax along with a number of his posts - will
carefully select the bullying ones - which show the time line right
through
his working day? Just an informattive letter so that they can understand
how
the assistant prosecutor spends his time? Just to do a public service to
the
community over there? JMW will learn from this not to joust with a person
who has resources.

He certainly deserves some sort of retaliation given what he is trying
to do to you, even if he has got his wires crossed again.

Absolutely - I am now in the process of finding out who his boss is and will
do an 'informative' letter that would be of intense interest.

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:13:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:45:53 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:03:41 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>>news:[email hidden]...
>>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:05:37 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email hidden]...
>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>One of your 'normal' people - in fact your leader - sees fit to
>>>>>>>>>>divulge
>>>>>>>>>>private information about others with no provocation all the
>>>>>>>>>>time.
>>>>>>>>>>So shut your piehole, putz.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your name is private?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes on usenet certainly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Certainly?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b2277
>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/acgg7
>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/buzhh
>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8kr9t
>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/bkaxk
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I already told you a member of my family has those details and is
>>>>>>diabetic -
>>>>>>I was helping him get info
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh-huh. Sure.
>>>>
>>>>I'll be seeing Cohen later in Jan - would you like to wager $1000 on
>>>>that?
>>>>I can easy prove I'm not that person. We each send $1000 to David if
>>>>you
>>>>have the guts to do it,
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's six months salary for Williams! ;o)
>>
>>Ha ha! - He continuously makes a fool of himself. First he triumphantly
>>'exposed' my company and it's website. Fell on his slimy face. On this
>>effort I will easy show him to be dead wrong again. His little game
>>will
>>backfire again
>>
>
> He's just a slimy blackmailer, and if you let him think for one moment
> that he has anything sensitive on you, he will use it to your supposed
> disadvantage.
>
> There is plenty that will embarrass him if you want to go looking
> through the archives. If he gets too awful I'll email you the links.
>
> Don't forget that I will say "Done" when I have emailed you! ;o)

I was thinking of a nice letter to the Courthouse in Wayne Country - make
a
little presentation about things they should know about the Assistant
Prosecutor - maybe send it by fax along with a number of his posts - will
carefully select the bullying ones - which show the time line right
through
his working day? Just an informattive letter so that they can understand
how
the assistant prosecutor spends his time? Just to do a public service to
the
community over there? JMW will learn from this not to joust with a person
who has resources.

He certainly deserves some sort of retaliation given what he is trying
to do to you, even if he has got his wires crossed again.

Absolutely - I am now in the process of finding out who his boss is and will
do an 'informative' letter that would be of intense interest.

This may help:
http://www.enforcergraphics.com/crime.htm

or this:
http://www.woosteroh.com/Legal/index.htm

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

re JMW <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

You're a pathetic piece of [censored] with no backbone.

Careful, David, he seems to think that having an unfavorable opinion
of him means that you've gone off the deep end, are screaming like a
banshee, and, of course, are a troll.

--

John said:

Damn you're testy.

But weren't you the one asking about androgens?

(ba dump bump)

--

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

re JMW <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

You're a pathetic piece of [censored] with no backbone.

Careful, David, he seems to think that having an unfavorable opinion
of him means that you've gone off the deep end, are screaming like a
banshee, and, of course, are a troll.

--

Ha ha! (I have to work on that banshee thing)

In article <[email hidden]>,

Curt James said:

John said:

Damn you're testy.

But weren't you the one asking about androgens?

(ba dump bump)

<lol>
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

David said:

Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Quoted message said:

I am taking it a step further

Good.

Quoted message said:

as I warned him I would.

Cool.

Quoted message said:

He is a very stupid man.

No argument there.

--

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Quoted message said:

I am taking it a step further

Good.

Quoted message said:

as I warned him I would.

Cool.

Quoted message said:

He is a very stupid man.

No argument there.

Thanks!

Curt James said:

David said:

Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Playing with heat can be very tricky. One should become familiar with
Ohio criminal statutes on Telecommunications Harassment and Coercion.
It would be unfortunate if planned travel to the United States was
disrupted due to legal issues.

JRH said:

That's six months salary for <snip>

I couldn't deal with actually including the poor guy's name. Come now,
why, he'll be screeeeeeeeeeeeeemin' like a banshee being chased by a
troll gone off the deep and disgruntled end, if you keep that up.

Or something like that.

Ready for 2006, my friend?

Best wishes for the new year! :o)

--

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

David said:

Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Playing with heat can be very tricky. One should become familiar with
Ohio criminal statutes on Telecommunications Harassment and Coercion.
It would be unfortunate if planned travel to the United States was
disrupted due to legal issues.

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song.

JMW said:

Curt James said:

David said:

Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Playing with heat can be very tricky. One should become familiar with
Ohio criminal statutes on Telecommunications Harassment and Coercion.
It would be unfortunate if planned travel to the United States was
disrupted due to legal issues.

Can you believe the lack of moral fortitude in this bully and stalker
called John Williams - The Enforcer", who has been running people
ragged for years, with malice aforethought, in this Group and many
others.

He has picked, at last, on the wrong person, who is taking formal
action to curb Williams' anti-social and sinister behaviour; and what
does Williams do? Why he screams like the imposter he really is and
blusters and threatens legal action concerning "Telecommunications
harassment" and immigration restrictions, to prevent the enemy *he*
has created from retaliating by written/telephone communication, or
travelling to the United States.

What a fraud you really are Williams. Well, I've got news for you old
lad; you have bitten off more than you can chew this time, and a long
overdue day of reckoning is heading your way. I don't think that David
the Oz is bluffing and you will no doubt have to face the music in due
course - all quite legally of course, as the Oz is more than
substantial enough to give instructions to his own legal advisors.

I think the Group will enjoy seeing you get your comeuppance at last.

Curt James said:

JRH said:

That's six months salary for <snip>

I couldn't deal with actually including the poor guy's name.

It's John Williams Curt, the impecunious assistant prosecutor at age
51, and going nowhere fast.

Quoted message said:

Come now,
why, he'll be screeeeeeeeeeeeeemin' like a banshee being chased by a
troll gone off the deep and disgruntled end, if you keep that up.

Who gives a stuff? Give him back what he has been dishing out for
years.

Quoted message said:

Or something like that.

Ready for 2006, my friend?

With bated breath old chum, with a few cases of Bollinger on ice and a
great crowd of friends and family ready to help us see it in.

Quoted message said:

Best wishes for the new year! :o)

Why thank you Curt, and heartily reciprocated my friend. ;o)

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:49:06 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
>this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
>usenet is one thing.

Heat! Sweet.

Playing with heat can be very tricky. One should become familiar with
Ohio criminal statutes on Telecommunications Harassment and Coercion.
It would be unfortunate if planned travel to the United States was
disrupted due to legal issues.

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song.

He doesn't like it up him does he? What a great [censored]; he causes all
the trouble and then squeals when the tables are turned.

Have a great weekend David - you know I intend to!! ;o)

TFIF!

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:49:06 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:

>David <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Thing is that he will have to cop some heat
>>this time. I am on to it. Bothering someone on
>>usenet is one thing.
>
>Heat! Sweet.

Playing with heat can be very tricky. One should become familiar with
Ohio criminal statutes on Telecommunications Harassment and Coercion.
It would be unfortunate if planned travel to the United States was
disrupted due to legal issues.

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song.

He doesn't like it up him does he? What a great [censored]; he causes all
the trouble and then squeals when the tables are turned.

Have a great weekend David - you know I intend to!! ;o)

This piece of dog [censored] will have to find a new hobby soon as his 'harassment
techniques' will be a thing of the past.

John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

For the life of me, I can't figure out why you would
want to squabble with the likes of

<snip>

Quoted message said:

I don't understand why you two have to be so
damned childish.

<snip>

Listen to you! Man, what a hoot. Scratch your surface a tiny bit and
you're just as squabblesome and childish as the next guy, Hanson.

Someone said you lived with your parents.

From your namecalling and, yes, childish posts and comments, I assumed
you were a 20-something, so I *asked* something like, "Does he live
with his mommy?"

Yes, as a joke, but you reacted like a crybaby [censored] by posting my
home address (as if that was some big deal) and even insulted my
freaking LANDLORD (like I care). I only offer these two examples to
show that you're talking out your ass, apparently.

Squabblesome? Childish? I can't see how you could criticize anyone for
that kind of behavior as you've exhibited the same behavior yourself.

Yeah, yeah, save it.

"Neener, neener, you live in an apartment on Pitt Street in Carlisle.
What does that tell you?"

Like I said, what a hoot. No wonder your ribs overlap. Maybe it's
because you're a JERK!

Oh, yeah, a hypocritical jerk at that. :o)

--