Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Vintage Campy hubs

Started by George · · Last activity · 9 posts · 553 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 August 2003
Last activity
1 September 2003
Original author
George
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
553
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi, How many speed is that hub: cgi.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dll
    URL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting Unfortunately I have not Campy catalogs from those years
    so I don't know if it is 5sp or 6sp? Thanks, George.

  2. George said:

    Hi, How many speed is that hub: cgi.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dll
    exURL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting Unfortunately I have not Campy catalogs from those
    years so I don't know if it is 5sp or 6sp?

    It's 5. But, early 6-speed freewheels were made to fit hubs intended for 5-speed. The spacing really
    should be 120mm, not 122.

    I have a couple sets of these hubs. They are very well-made, but beware of the axles. If you are
    heavy (last time I rode them I was about 210lbs) they can break on you.

    It's also your decision to buy at that price... but that is a lot for old hubs that no one seems to
    want anymore except for restorations. They regularly show up at swap meets. In fact, like I said, I
    do have some....

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | It is a scientifically proven fact that a mid life crisis can _`\(,_ | only be cured by
    something racy and Italian. Bianchis and (_)/ (_) | Colnagos are a lot cheaper than Maserattis
    and Ferraris. -- Glenn Davies

  3. User David L. Johnson said:

    It's 5.


    Thanks for the info David.

    Quoted message said:

    It's also your decision to buy at that price... but that is a lot for old hubs that no one seems
    to want anymore except for restorations. They regularly show up at swap meets. In fact, like I
    said, I do have some....


    I have bought the same pair of hubs here on the polish eBay for the much lighter price. They are new
    in the mint condition. Unfortunately it seemed to me they are track hubs, but it has appeared they
    haven't :-( Regards, George.

  4. << How many speed is that hub: >><BR><BR>

    Seller said 122mm spacing(should be 120mm) and it is 5 or6s freewheel hub. Original was a 5s
    tho-in 1972.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  5. Quoted message said:

    I have a couple sets of these hubs. They are very well-made, but beware of the axles. If you are
    heavy (last time I rode them I was about 210lbs) they can break on you.

    I ride Campy Record hubs-some space to 130- as my regular hubs and at 220 lbs I NEVER break axles.
    Your dropout faces must be parallel or you will break axles. Phil Broen

  6. Medio tutissimus ibis. (Ovid)

    David L. Johnson said:
    George said:

    How many speed is that hub: cgi.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dll
    RL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting

    Quoted message said:

    It's 5. But, early 6-speed freewheels were made to fit hubs intended for 5-speed. The spacing
    really should be 120mm, not 122.

    Like language, rear hub spacing has been subject to evolutionary changes as the number of rear
    sprockets increased. Over time, Campagnolo's Record series hubs for freewheels were offered with
    various optional axle lengths. There's no reason to suggest that an over-locknut spacing of 122 mm
    for the subject 1035 model is somehow improper or incorrect.

    -------------------------------
    businesscycles.combusinesscycles.com John Dacey Business Cycles, Miami, Florida 305-273-4440 Now in our
    twenty-first year. Our catalog of track equipment: eighth year online
    -------------------------------

  7. Phil Brown said:


    Quoted message said:

    I have a couple sets of these hubs. They are very well-made, but beware of the axles. If you are
    heavy (last time I rode them I was about 210lbs) they can break on you.

    I ride Campy Record hubs-some space to 130- as my regular hubs and at 220 lbs I NEVER break axles.
    Your dropout faces must be parallel or you will break axles. Phil Broen

    Well, our experiences differ. I submit, though, that a small lack of alignment of dropouts would not
    cause the sort of axle breakage I had once I re-spaced my rear to 130mm (it was done by a reputable
    builder, so I presume they were aligned properly). I broke 4 axles in one summer. Went to cassettes,
    same frame, and broke none.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored _`\(,_ | by little statesmen
    and philosophers and divines. --Ralph Waldo (_)/ (_) | Emerson

  8. Senectus est natura loquacior. - (Cicero)

    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    JDacey-<< There's no reason to suggest that an over-locknut spacing of 122 mm for the subject 1035
    model is somehow improper or incorrect. >><BR><BR>

    Certainly not 'improper' but I doubt correct, in that I doubt it came outta the factory at 122mm...

    I'm not in a position to vouch for the status of the twenty-five + year old used hub that's the
    subject of the instant thread.

    I note however, that Sutherland's Handbook lists no fewer than two incremental widths falling
    between 120 and 126 mm for Record road hubs of this era. If you have documentation to support your
    comment that it "should be 120 mm" else it be not "correct" in some way, please share the
    reference citation.

    -------------------------------
    businesscycles.combusinesscycles.com John Dacey Business Cycles, Miami, Florida 305-273-4440 Now in our
    twenty-first year. Our catalog of track equipment: eighth year online
    -------------------------------

  9. 30 Aug 2003 23:04:14 -0400 'David L. Johnson said:

    Well, our experiences differ. I submit, though, that a small lack of alignment of dropouts would
    not cause the sort of axle breakage I had once I re-spaced my rear to 130mm (it was done by a
    reputable builder, so I presume they were aligned properly). I broke 4 axles in one summer. Went to
    cassettes, same frame, and broke none.

    It's never safe to just assume that someone has "just taken care of
    it." Some of the worst aligned forkend I've ever seen came from "top" builders. Even a small amount
    of misalignment can put a LOT of additional stress on your axle. I'm sure that if the
    misalignment is in exactly the "right" direction this can somewhat cancel out the stress due to
    the rider's weight and the chain tension, but the misalignment is typically complex and random,
    so I would expect the resultant to be negative.

    Properly aligned forkend just work better in SO many ways....

    -
    -----------------------------------------------
    Jim Adney [email hidden] Madison, WI 53711 USA
    -----------------------------------------------

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.