General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Beef roasting time

Started by Mark Shaw · · Last activity · 20 posts · 831 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 December 2005
Last activity
29 December 2005
Original author
Mark Shaw
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
831
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Don't try to talk me out of this: I've done it this way before, and
    it's come out fantastic. I'm just trying to figure out my cooking
    times. I've historically just figured on about three hours, but
    this is the biggest roast I've ever dealt with, and I need something
    more like a time-per-pound figure.

    I've done some web searching, and and have found some tables - but
    they all seem to assume an initial hot oven (to "seal in the juices"😉
    followed by a longer roast at 325F.

    Oh, also: this is the first Xmas I've had a convection oven at my
    disposal. Convection, or normal? Or does it matter?

    Thanks for any info, and Happy Solstice to all.

    --
    Mark Shaw
    ========================================================================
    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
    discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny....'" - Isaac Asimov

  2. "Mark Shaw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    I've historically just figured on about three hours, but
    this is the biggest roast I've ever dealt with, and I need something
    more like a time-per-pound figure.

    If three hours worked, figur about 20 to 30 minutes more.

    ..

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, also: this is the first Xmas I've had a convection oven at my
    disposal. Convection, or normal? Or does it matter?

    Convection will cook faster so use care if you try it. Rule of thumb is 25%
    less time and 25 degrees cooler, but you are on the cool side already.

  3. Mark Shaw said:

    I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Don't try to talk me out of this: I've done it this way before.

    If you already know everything don't ask.

  4. Edwin Pawlowski said:

    "Mark Shaw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    I've historically just figured on about three hours, but
    this is the biggest roast I've ever dealt with, and I need something
    more like a time-per-pound figure.

    Quoted message said:

    If three hours worked, figur about 20 to 30 minutes more.

    That was for smaller roasts, though.

    Well, it's not going to be getting into the oven before noon
    anyway, so figuring 30 min/lb it should be done with the first-
    stage cooking by 4PM. Time to achieve 130F via carryover might
    be my only issue - but hey, nobody's eating till it's done,
    right? 🙂

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, also: this is the first Xmas I've had a convection oven at my
    disposal. Convection, or normal? Or does it matter?

    Quoted message said:

    Convection will cook faster so use care if you try it. Rule of thumb is 25%
    less time and 25 degrees cooler, but you are on the cool side already.

    I think I'll go the convection route, then. Thanks.

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
    ========================================================================
    "There must be security for all, or no one is secure. This does not mean
    giving up any freedom, except the freedom to act irresponsibly."
    - Klaatu

  5. Mark Shaw said:

    I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    Quoted message said:

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Results: it took about 4 1/2 hours to come up to 118F, and
    another hour for carryover to take it to 128F. I actually
    left in in the hot oven for 15 minutes, and after a brief
    rest it carved out to a very nice medium-rare.

    So: about 45 min/lb for the initial roasting and carryover.
    This was with the convection option.

    Tip: if any of your guests prefer their beef medium, you
    can bring it up easily and safely by heating their slices
    gently in a skillet on a bed of lettuce. (Naturally, if
    anyone requests well-done, you should just send them out
    for hamburgers.)

    --
    Mark Shaw
    ========================================================================
    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
    discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny....'" - Isaac Asimov

  6. On Mon 26 Dec 2005 09:12:22a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Mark Shaw?

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Shaw said:

    I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    Quoted message said:

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Results: it took about 4 1/2 hours to come up to 118F, and
    another hour for carryover to take it to 128F. I actually
    left in in the hot oven for 15 minutes, and after a brief
    rest it carved out to a very nice medium-rare.

    So: about 45 min/lb for the initial roasting and carryover.
    This was with the convection option.

    Tip: if any of your guests prefer their beef medium, you
    can bring it up easily and safely by heating their slices
    gently in a skillet on a bed of lettuce. (Naturally, if
    anyone requests well-done, you should just send them out
    for hamburgers.)

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it well
    done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I find that
    it's still tender and juicy.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    __________________________________________________________________
    And if we enter a room full of manure, may we believe in the pony.

  7. Wayne Boatwright said:

    On Mon 26 Dec 2005 09:12:22a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Mark Shaw?

    Quoted message said:

    Mark Shaw <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tip: if any of your guests prefer their beef medium, you
    can bring it up easily and safely by heating their slices
    gently in a skillet on a bed of lettuce. (Naturally, if
    anyone requests well-done, you should just send them out
    for hamburgers.)

    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it well
    done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I find that
    it's still tender and juicy.

    Depends on the cut. For a steak, I'd call that medium-rare;
    for a rib roast I'd call it medium.

    Medium-well is no pink at all but still juicy.

    --
    Mark Shaw
    ========================================================================
    "Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of mnshaw@
    celestial fire called conscience." - George Washington gmail.com

  8. On Mon 26 Dec 2005 09:31:47a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Mark Shaw?

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    On Mon 26 Dec 2005 09:12:22a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Mark
    Shaw?

    Quoted message said:

    Mark Shaw <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tip: if any of your guests prefer their beef medium, you
    can bring it up easily and safely by heating their slices
    gently in a skillet on a bed of lettuce. (Naturally, if
    anyone requests well-done, you should just send them out for
    hamburgers.)

    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it
    well done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I
    find that it's still tender and juicy.

    Depends on the cut. For a steak, I'd call that medium-rare;
    for a rib roast I'd call it medium.

    Medium-well is no pink at all but still juicy.

    Thanks, Mark.

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    __________________________________________________________________
    And if we enter a room full of manure, may we believe in the pony.

  9. Wayne Boatwright <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it
    well done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I
    find that it's still tender and juicy.

    Someday you'll stick a probe in the meat, stick a color card in a reader
    and when the probe matches the reader, PRESTO!

    Andy

  10. Andy said:

    Wayne Boatwright <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it
    well done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I
    find that it's still tender and juicy.

    Someday you'll stick a probe in the meat, stick a color card in a reader
    and when the probe matches the reader, PRESTO!

    ARBYS!

  11. Wayne Boatwright said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it well
    done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I find that
    it's still tender and juicy.

    I'd call it medium rare, but if you don't like that, go with medium.
    Medium well would be way overcooked.

    Crash only liked well done beef when we first got together. Now he's
    ordering medium rare. I've been edjumacating him!

    Carol, who'll actually go to rare if it's beef tenderloin

  12. Damsel in dis Dress said:

    On 26 Dec 2005 17:22:57 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it well
    done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I find that
    it's still tender and juicy.

    Quoted message said:

    I'd call it medium rare, but if you don't like that, go with medium.
    Medium well would be way overcooked.

    Quoted message said:

    Crash only liked well done beef when we first got together. Now he's
    ordering medium rare. I've been edjumacating him!

    Quoted message said:

    Carol, who'll actually go to rare if it's beef tenderloin

    Heck, if the tenderloin is fresh and high-quality, I'll go
    to raw. Nothing like tenderloin sashimi.

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
    ========================================================================
    "There must be security for all, or no one is secure. This does not mean
    giving up any freedom, except the freedom to act irresponsibly."
    - Klaatu

  13. On Mon 26 Dec 2005 02:35:16p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Damsel in
    dis Dress?

    Quoted message said:
    Wayne Boatwright said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it
    well done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well? I
    find that it's still tender and juicy.

    I'd call it medium rare, but if you don't like that, go with medium.
    Medium well would be way overcooked.

    Crash only liked well done beef when we first got together. Now he's
    ordering medium rare. I've been edjumacating him!

    Carol, who'll actually go to rare if it's beef tenderloin

    I grew up in a house of well-done beef eaters. I've graduated to medium,
    but I doubt I'll ever go for anything more rare than that. Droplets of
    blood make me lose my appetite. <g>

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    __________________________________________________________________
    And if we enter a room full of manure, may we believe in the pony.

  14. On Mon 26 Dec 2005 03:06:50p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Mark Shaw?

    Quoted message said:
    Damsel in dis Dress said:

    On 26 Dec 2005 17:22:57 +0100, Wayne Boatwright
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't like any meat cooked rare or medium-rare. Nor do I like it
    well done. What would you call just pink throughout? Medium-well?
    I find that it's still tender and juicy.

    Quoted message said:

    I'd call it medium rare, but if you don't like that, go with medium.
    Medium well would be way overcooked.

    Quoted message said:

    Crash only liked well done beef when we first got together. Now he's
    ordering medium rare. I've been edjumacating him!

    Quoted message said:

    Carol, who'll actually go to rare if it's beef tenderloin

    Heck, if the tenderloin is fresh and high-quality, I'll go
    to raw. Nothing like tenderloin sashimi.

    Well, that would drive me away from the table. More for you! <g>

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    __________________________________________________________________
    And if we enter a room full of manure, may we believe in the pony.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, Mark Shaw

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Shaw said:

    I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    Quoted message said:

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Results: it took about 4 1/2 hours to come up to 118F, and
    another hour for carryover to take it to 128F. I actually
    left in in the hot oven for 15 minutes, and after a brief
    rest it carved out to a very nice medium-rare.

    So: about 45 min/lb for the initial roasting and carryover.
    This was with the convection option.


    Hmmmm. 200F. That's my plate-warming temp. No room for the roast.
    Guess I could just sit with the roast in my lap for a couple of TV
    football games. But if you really found a slooooow-roast better than a
    more expeditious one, I could find a way.

  16. Stark said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Mark Shaw

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a 7 lb 10 oz standing rib roast (bone-in) which I intend
    to roast to an internal temperature of 118F in a 200F oven. After
    carryover takes it to 130F, it'll go back in at 500F for about 10
    minutes for crusting.

    Quoted message said:

    How long should I anticipate it would take to achieve those
    temperature targets?

    Results: it took about 4 1/2 hours to come up to 118F, and
    another hour for carryover to take it to 128F. I actually
    left in in the hot oven for 15 minutes, and after a brief
    rest it carved out to a very nice medium-rare.

    So: about 45 min/lb for the initial roasting and carryover.
    This was with the convection option.


    Hmmmm. 200F. That's my plate-warming temp. No room for the roast.

    Hah! My plates get warmed on my hood shelf under a heat lamp.

    http://www.panix.com/~mshaw/images/kitchen/target48.html

    Quoted message said:

    Guess I could just sit with the roast in my lap for a couple of TV
    football games. But if you really found a slooooow-roast better than a
    more expeditious one, I could find a way.

    I've always prefered low-and-slow for beef. The connective
    tissue gets rubbery at higher temps, and makes the meat tough.

    --
    Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
    ========================================================================
    "All of my mistakes are giving me ideas." - Natalie Lileks

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Wayne Boatwright said:

    On Mon 26 Dec 2005 02:35:16p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Damsel in
    dis Dress?

    Quoted message said:

    I grew up in a house of well-done beef eaters. I've graduated to medium,
    but I doubt I'll ever go for anything more rare than that. Droplets of
    blood make me lose my appetite. <g>

    We ate a lot of beef when I was a kid. It was always very well cooked.
    It was very cheap beef, so it needed to be braised anyway.

    --
    Dan Abel
    [email hidden]
    Petaluma, California, USA

  18. On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:08:06 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark Shaw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    I've historically just figured on about three hours, but
    this is the biggest roast I've ever dealt with, and I need something
    more like a time-per-pound figure.

    If three hours worked, figur about 20 to 30 minutes more.

    .

    Quoted message said:


    Oh, also: this is the first Xmas I've had a convection oven at my
    disposal. Convection, or normal? Or does it matter?

    Convection will cook faster so use care if you try it. Rule of thumb is 25%
    less time and 25 degrees cooler, but you are on the cool side already.


    Did this for Christmas Dinner: 2kb (4 and a half pounds) scotch
    fillet in the piece - cooked just right at 190 C for 1 and a half
    hours. Lovely and red in the middle for the lovers of rare meat, and
    more medium on the outside and ends for the rest. Perfect.

    Daisy

    Carthage demands an explanation for this insolence!

  19. Daisy said:

    Did this for Christmas Dinner: 2kb (4 and a half pounds) scotch
    fillet in the piece - cooked just right at 190 C for 1 and a half
    hours. Lovely and red in the middle for the lovers of rare meat, and
    more medium on the outside and ends for the rest. Perfect.

    What is a scotch fillet?

    Thanks.

    --
    Mark Shaw
    ========================================================================
    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
    discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny....'" - Isaac Asimov

  20. Dan Abel said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Wayne Boatwright said:

    On Mon 26 Dec 2005 02:35:16p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Damsel in
    dis Dress?

    Quoted message said:

    I grew up in a house of well-done beef eaters. I've graduated to medium,
    but I doubt I'll ever go for anything more rare than that. Droplets of
    blood make me lose my appetite. <g>

    We ate a lot of beef when I was a kid. It was always very well cooked.
    It was very cheap beef, so it needed to be braised anyway.

    I grew up in a house full of beef eaters too, but all my mother
    required was that the cow wasn't kicking when she carved it. I never
    had pot roast unless I was asked over to a friend's house for dinner.
    --

    Practice safe eating. Always use condiments.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.