Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Decrease Seat to Bars Vertical Distance (Trig Check)

Started by Tom S · · Last activity · 11 posts · 798 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 August 2003
Last activity
27 August 2003
Original author
Tom S
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
798
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I want to decrease the vertical distance.
    (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older and have lost some suppleness.) In order to save time on
    installing and removing (possibly) numerous stems, I thought I'd try to remember some high school
    trig. Here was my approach: My current stem is installed with a 7 degrees up angle, 130mm (5.2 in
    length). If I install a new 17 degree stem with the same 130mm length, the rise towards the bars of
    the stem should be 0.95 inches. TAN(&😉= y/x; x=5.2 in

    Did I commit any glaring errors in the thought process?
    --
    Tom S

  2. Can't help with the trig, but if the angle of the stem increases and the length stays the same, not
    only will the bars come up, but they will also come closer. So if you want the same overall reach
    you will have to get a longer stem.

    "Tom S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I want to decrease the vertical distance.
    (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older and have lost


    some

    Quoted message said:

    suppleness.) In order to save time on installing and removing (possibly) numerous stems, I
    thought I'd try to remember some high school trig. Here was my approach: My current stem is
    installed with a 7 degrees up angle, 130mm (5.2 in length). If I install a new 17 degree stem
    with the same 130mm length,


    the

    Quoted message said:

    rise towards the bars of the stem should be 0.95 inches. TAN(&😉= y/x; x=5.2 in

    Did I commit any glaring errors in the thought process?
    --
    Tom S

  3. Tom S said:

    My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I want to decrease the vertical distance.
    (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older and have lost some suppleness.) In order to save time on
    installing and removing (possibly) numerous stems, I thought I'd try to remember some high school
    trig. Here was my approach: My current stem is installed with a 7 degrees up angle, 130mm (5.2 in
    length). If I install a new 17 degree stem with the same 130mm length, the rise towards the bars of
    the stem should be 0.95 inches. TAN(&😉= y/x; x=5.2 in

    Did I commit any glaring errors in the thought process?

    It's too late to do trig. Save yourself some time:

    habcycles.comfitting.html

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

  4. "Tom S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I


    want to decrease

    Quoted message said:

    the vertical distance. (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older


    and have lost some

    Quoted message said:

    suppleness.) In order to save time on installing and


    removing (possibly)

    Quoted message said:

    numerous stems, I thought I'd try to remember some high


    school trig. Here

    Quoted message said:

    was my approach: My current stem is installed with a 7 degrees up angle,


    130mm (5.2 in

    Quoted message said:

    length). If I install a new 17 degree stem with the same


    130mm length, the

    Quoted message said:

    rise towards the bars of the stem should be 0.95 inches.


    TAN(&😉= y/x;

    Quoted message said:

    x=5.2 in

    Did I commit any glaring errors in the thought process?
    --
    Tom S


    To be picky, if you want vertical distance you need a sine function, not tangent. A 13cm stem angled
    7 degrees up from the horizontal will put the bars 0.1219*13 = 1.58cm above the horizontal. A 13cm
    stem angled 17 degrees will put the bars 0.2924*13 = 3.80cm above, for an increase of
    2.22cm......

    That said, there's not a hell of a lot of difference between sine and tangent for small angles -
    tan(17) is 0.3057 - so you're close enough.....

    As someone else pointed out, the bars will also move closer to the seat - use the difference in the
    cosines of the two angles multiplied by the stem length to calculate how much closer

  5. Tom S said:

    My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I want to decrease the vertical distance.
    (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older and have lost some suppleness.) In order to save time on
    installing and removing (possibly) numerous stems, I thought I'd try to remember some high school
    trig. Here was my approach: My current stem is installed with a 7 degrees up angle, 130mm (5.2 in
    length). If I install a new 17 degree stem with the same 130mm length, the rise towards the bars
    of the stem should be 0.95 inches. TAN(&😉= y/x; x=5.2 in

    Your calculations are most likely correct, if the angles you mention are relative to the horizontal
    plane. If you buy a stem that is marketed as +- 6 degrees, for example, it means that the rise with
    a 72 degree head tube is actually 24 (18+6) or 12 degrees (18-6). Also, as was mentioned, a stem of
    the same length at a higher angle brings the handlebar slightly closer also horizontally.

    -as

  6. From one Tom to another one. I'm 73, try a $19.95 3" stem extender and then you can get the height
    you want and stay with the same stem. It worked for me. Old age is tough; but, the alternative is
    worse. Keep riding.

    Tom

    -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- newsfeeds.comnewsfeeds.com - The #1
    Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

  7. "Grenouil" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To be picky, if you want vertical distance you need a sine function, not tangent. A 13cm stem
    angled 7 degrees up from the horizontal will put the bars 0.1219*13 = 1.58cm above the horizontal.
    A 13cm stem angled 17 degrees will put the bars 0.2924*13 = 3.80cm above, for an increase of
    2.22cm......

    That said, there's not a hell of a lot of difference between sine and tangent for small angles -
    tan(17) is 0.3057 - so you're close enough.....

    As someone else pointed out, the bars will also move closer to the seat - use the difference in
    the cosines of the two angles multiplied by the stem length to calculate how much closer

    Or, eyeball it.

    🙂

    Bill "rotate dem risers" S.

  8. Thanks to all responders, greatly appreciated. New stem on the way.

    Tom

    --
    Tom S "Tom S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My bars are about 1 inch too low for my preference and I want to decrease the vertical distance.
    (OK, I'll admit I'm getting older and have lost


    some

    Quoted message said:

    suppleness.) In order to save time on installing and removing (possibly) numerous stems, I
    thought I'd try to remember some high school trig. Here was my approach: My current stem is
    installed with a 7 degrees up angle, 130mm (5.2 in length). If I install a new 17 degree stem
    with the same 130mm length,


    the

    Quoted message said:

    rise towards the bars of the stem should be 0.95 inches. TAN(&😉= y/x; x=5.2 in

    Did I commit any glaring errors in the thought process?
    --
    Tom S

  9. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Old age is tough

    "Old age is not for sissies..."
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

  10. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody that says "I'm not gettin older, I'm getting better", I think I want to punch them.

    And there were people like Jacques Cousteau who maintained that they didn't feel any different at,
    say, 65 than they did at 20. I remember when I heard that thinking "Jacques, baby, you've been
    laying around on that boat too much all these years. If you'd been pushing any kind of envelope,
    you'd sures notice the diff..."
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

  11. Damn! I left my machinery handbook and trig tables at work!!

    May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills! Chris

    Chris'Z Corner "The Website for the Common Bicyclist": geocities.comczcorner

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.